- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Spinoff thread: Jackson Pollock's artwork.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 11:55 pm to Zappas Stache
Posted on 2/19/16 at 11:55 pm to Zappas Stache
quote:What education do I need to judge this?
For about the tenth time today, modern art is not about a quick "look". You have to educate yourself before judging.
You prove my point about you being a pretentious snob with every post of yours.
Posted on 2/20/16 at 12:03 am to GRTiger
quote:What the hell are you talking about? When did I say I like or dislike things only because others do? I said the opposite.
You basing your likes and dislikes purely on the opinion of others is the other side of the same coin you call pretentious
I don't succumb to peer pressure. Never have, never will. If I like something, I say so. Same if I dislike it, regardless of who else does.
Posted on 2/20/16 at 12:03 am to bhtigerfan
quote:
It might just be because it is baseball season again.
I could sit and look at a Rothko for hours.......well......for several minutes.
quote:
You prove my point about you being a pretentious snob with every post of yours.
By asking you to educate yourself? I guess so.
Posted on 2/20/16 at 12:10 am to bhtigerfan
Perhaps other people are like that too, just with different opinions from your own.
I might have misunderstood your fricky sentence about hating art that so many other people like but you don't. But you certainly let a concensus opinion affect how you view every person who has that opinion. If you can't see how pretentious that is, I don't know what to tell you.
I might have misunderstood your fricky sentence about hating art that so many other people like but you don't. But you certainly let a concensus opinion affect how you view every person who has that opinion. If you can't see how pretentious that is, I don't know what to tell you.
Posted on 2/20/16 at 12:13 am to Zappas Stache
quote:Yes, telling people "they don't understand modern art because they're not educated in art" is very pretentious and ridiculous.
You prove my point about you being a pretentious snob with every post of yours.
By asking you to educate yourself? I guess so.
That's like saying that I don't recognize a beautiful building because I haven't studied architecture.
Posted on 2/20/16 at 12:14 am to GRTiger
quote:I would say I'm more narrow minded, not pretentious.
If you can't see how pretentious that is, I don't know what to tell you.
Music is similar. I can see the appreciation of many different types of music, although I may not listen to alot of it.
Like jazz. Some is okay, but alot of jazz is just terrible. It has no rhythm or flow. It's like 5 different musicians playing a different song.
This post was edited on 2/20/16 at 12:19 am
Posted on 2/20/16 at 12:18 am to bhtigerfan
quote:
Yes, telling people "they don't understand modern art because they're not educated in art" is very pretentious and ridiculous.
I can see how someone like you would think so.
Posted on 2/20/16 at 12:23 am to Zappas Stache
quote:How very pretentious of you. Thanks.
I can see how someone like you would think so.
My older sister has a Masters in Fine Arts. Frida Kahlo is one of her favorites. I'm gonna have to ask her what she thinks about Pollock and Rothko. I value her opinion.
Do you have an art degree?
This post was edited on 2/20/16 at 12:24 am
Posted on 2/20/16 at 12:29 am to bhtigerfan
quote:
Do you have an art degree?
Design degree. Pollock is not one of my favorites but I admire your ability to argue your dislike for .....what.....9 hours now? Ha-ha....let's debate Donald Judd next week.
Posted on 2/20/16 at 12:46 am to Zappas Stache
I don't know shot about fine art...bit If people are spending 50 million on a piece we should at least study it thoroughly...
Posted on 2/20/16 at 12:55 am to Zappas Stache
quote:I'm tenacious.
I admire your ability to argue your dislike for .....what.....9 hours now? Ha-ha..
Sorry about the insults, I can get a little fired up.
It's not so much my dislike of modern abstract art as it is the art world's ridiculous defense of it when it's criticized. It's always pretty much the standard answers you gave. "You don't understand it, you need to educate yourself, blah blah blah."
I'm just looking for a little honesty in this world, that's all. Just tell it like it is.
When my wife asks me what I think about an outfit she tries on, she knows she'll get the truth, good or bad.
Good night bro.
Posted on 2/20/16 at 12:57 am to bhtigerfan
Its all about the name --not his work. If you say you have a piece of his art, ppl think you have money and are in a different class. Lets be real here. The art is crap.
Posted on 2/20/16 at 1:01 am to klsu24
I have a 4x6 knock off I bought on EBay for a couple thou.
Love his work.
Love his work.
Posted on 2/20/16 at 1:03 am to matthew25
You spent 2k on a fake painting?
Posted on 2/20/16 at 1:03 am to klsu24
quote:That's what I've been saying all day.
Lets be real here. The art is crap.
Look at this piece of shite. Sold for $72.84 mil in '07. Looks like my bedroom wall when the wife was trying out paint swatches.

Posted on 2/20/16 at 1:05 am to matthew25
quote:Please tell us what's so great about his work.
Love his work.
So we can laugh and ridicule you.
I bet you think Kanye is a musical genius also.
This post was edited on 2/20/16 at 1:06 am
Posted on 2/20/16 at 1:16 am to bhtigerfan
I love retards like you. So self important that you never step back and think a little bit deeper. Why was Pollock important?
You only see "splatter" (as if that's all it was), or a soup can, and you dismiss it because it doesn't fit I to your neat, tidy little box as to what you think art needs to be.
No context, no understanding of the place in history, no understanding of the evolution of art and concepts, no understanding of the method or thought process.
I see a Rothko and admit I don't fully get it, but I also understand that it's important for a reason.
You only see "splatter" (as if that's all it was), or a soup can, and you dismiss it because it doesn't fit I to your neat, tidy little box as to what you think art needs to be.
No context, no understanding of the place in history, no understanding of the evolution of art and concepts, no understanding of the method or thought process.
I see a Rothko and admit I don't fully get it, but I also understand that it's important for a reason.
Posted on 2/20/16 at 1:26 am to Fun Bunch
quote:Me, self important? WTF are you talking about a-hole?
So self important that you never step back and think a little bit deeper. Why was Pollock important?
But please, keep acting as if the modern abstract artists have done so much to improve art.
Honest people see it for what it is. Shitty pretentious art by talentless artists for pretentious fans and critics.
This post was edited on 2/20/16 at 1:37 pm
Posted on 2/20/16 at 1:29 am to Fun Bunch
quote:That's all it was.
You only see "splatter" (as if that's all it was)

Posted on 2/20/16 at 1:55 am to bhtigerfan
Pollock's art is ok but my favorite painting has to be
"Red Square (Visual Realism of a Peasant Woman in Two Dimensions)"
by artist (author?) Kazimir Malevich
But no I'm actually not a fan..
"Red Square (Visual Realism of a Peasant Woman in Two Dimensions)"
by artist (author?) Kazimir Malevich
But no I'm actually not a fan..
Popular
Back to top


2




