Started By
Message

re: Spinoff thread: Jackson Pollock's artwork.

Posted on 2/20/16 at 2:31 pm to
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
33618 posts
Posted on 2/20/16 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

he's hilarious, a super intelligent dude who has a way with words. He's basically made a career and etched his name in the list of American literary greats by destroying modern pretentions. 
This was Zappas Stache's reply to my quote of Wolfe.
quote:

Wolfe was a calculating reactionary who knew there was an uneducated audience for clever critiques of modernism.
And he denied he was pretentious.
This post was edited on 2/20/16 at 2:34 pm
Posted by RDOtiger
Zachary
Member since Oct 2013
1187 posts
Posted on 2/20/16 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

FWIW, I saw a guy freehand paint numbers on a racecar and I thought that was pretty badass. Lines were perfectly straight, too.


That takes a lot of skill, so I appreciate their talent
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
33618 posts
Posted on 2/20/16 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

That takes a lot of skill, so I appreciate their talent
Meh. I know a chimp that can do that.
Posted by LuckySo-n-So
Member since Jul 2005
22754 posts
Posted on 2/20/16 at 5:12 pm to
I liken "modern" art, like Pollock's or any number of others' works, to modern Jazz or modern "classical" music.

The modern Jazz (fusion, bebop, whatever) and modern Classical genres all revolve around maybe 8 bars of a loose melody. When not in playing the "loose melody", instruments play whatever the frick they want, in whatever key they want, in whatever time signature they want, on whatever fricking planet they want. Rhythmns clash, chords clash, themes clash. While the trumpet is doing atonal runs, the bass may be in a different key, playing a third slower, and the brushes will be playing a tempo between the trumpet and the bass.

Just like Pollock, it's all mostly crap. Crap. Crap. Crap.
Posted by Calvin Candie
The Cleopatra Club
Member since Dec 2014
485 posts
Posted on 2/20/16 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

Always entertaining to read a thread where rednecks critique the work of Jackson Pollock.


Posted by RDOtiger
Zachary
Member since Oct 2013
1187 posts
Posted on 2/20/16 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

Meh. I know a chimp that can do that.


Well then, two things:

1) the chimp is probably more skilled than you
2) you need to put that chimp to work making millions for you
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79838 posts
Posted on 2/20/16 at 9:40 pm to
quote:

Just like Pollock, it's all mostly crap. Crap. Crap. Crap.




GET OFF MY LAWN!!!
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 2/20/16 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

These purchases are never driven by anything other than ego, and the fact that the paintings suck makes them that much more valuable for this purpose. It basically gives some rich frick the outlet to say, Look at me - I can wipe my arse with 500 million dollars."




No.

These "rich fricks" buy these and sell them for 30% more 5-10 years later.

There's usually a reason they are "rich fricks" in the first place.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79838 posts
Posted on 2/20/16 at 10:03 pm to
There is also a belief it is a medium for laundering money.

Not so far fetched.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram