
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/28/26 at 11:11 am to rt3
Posted on 9/28/26 at 11:11 am to Btrtigerfan
quote:
They detonated it.
It destructed on landing, doubt they activated the flight termination system after what ship 40 did.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 11:12 am to rt3
Posted on 9/28/26 at 11:14 am to rt3
Posted on 9/28/26 at 11:14 am to rt3
Posted on 9/28/26 at 11:14 am to rt3
Posted on 9/28/26 at 11:15 am to rt3
Posted on 9/28/26 at 11:25 am to rt3
Posted on 9/28/26 at 11:25 am to rt3
Posted on 9/28/26 at 11:49 am to rt3
Overall... a very successful flight
Made it to orbit on the 1st attempt to actually go orbital
Now officially an orbital class vehicle
Put working satellites into space... so it's now a revenue-generating vehicle as well
Both parts of the vehicle seemed to have successful landing burns
MAYBE we can think of a booster catch attempt in flight 15... if not catch BOTH vehicles?
There are 4 options for landing in flight 15 and all 4 seem viable/possible
1) dump both in water again (more data more better before risking launch tower)
2) catch ship/dump booster (booster had 2 engines go out today but seemed able to compensate)
3) catch booster/dump ship (ship also had an engine out but was able to compensate & get to orbit... b/c of that engine out only did 2 of its 9 planned orbits but safely splashed down at back-up landing zone)
4) catch both (both had successful landing burns despite their issues... why not go for broke?)
Made it to orbit on the 1st attempt to actually go orbital
Now officially an orbital class vehicle
Put working satellites into space... so it's now a revenue-generating vehicle as well
Both parts of the vehicle seemed to have successful landing burns
MAYBE we can think of a booster catch attempt in flight 15... if not catch BOTH vehicles?
There are 4 options for landing in flight 15 and all 4 seem viable/possible
1) dump both in water again (more data more better before risking launch tower)
2) catch ship/dump booster (booster had 2 engines go out today but seemed able to compensate)
3) catch booster/dump ship (ship also had an engine out but was able to compensate & get to orbit... b/c of that engine out only did 2 of its 9 planned orbits but safely splashed down at back-up landing zone)
4) catch both (both had successful landing burns despite their issues... why not go for broke?)
This post was edited on 9/28/26 at 11:57 am
Posted on 9/28/26 at 12:31 pm to rt3
So why are they still having engine failures?
Posted on 9/28/26 at 1:02 pm to LSUFanHouston
So why are they still having engine failures?
---That's what testing is all about
---That's what testing is all about
Posted on 9/28/26 at 1:45 pm to cypresstiger
quote:
That's what testing is all about
Absolutely. Just kinda surprised this far in still having problems
Posted on 9/28/26 at 1:49 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
Absolutely. Just kinda surprised this far in still having problems
This is only the 3rd flight for V3.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 2:15 pm to LSUFanHouston
Spacex's record for calling their Rockets ready for manned flight and then needing to hitch a ride back to earth on a competitor's ride is actually better than you think.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 2:19 pm to rt3
"SpaceX Starship explodes after first orbital trip"
As expected this was the headline of the first new story I saw about the launch today.
These motherfrickers don't miss a trick do they.
As expected this was the headline of the first new story I saw about the launch today.
These motherfrickers don't miss a trick do they.

Popular
Back to top


1










