- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/6/20 at 8:45 am to Icansee4miles
quote:
You forgot the bike path from 70805 to downtown, which is expected to experience heavy use.
No doubt.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 8:45 am to Comic_Tiger
quote:
Mestizo's deserves it
Piece of trash
Posted on 7/6/20 at 8:49 am to LaBR4
quote:
I've never thought of that...I think you're on to something
That area was already built up before Trader Joe’s.. Remember. There was a wal mart in that spot before the current center... this has to do with some drainage between Dawson’s creek and the mestizos... it always flooded but spread out along the interstates edges.. for some reason the water can’t drain fast enough anymore and just pushes up towards the restaurant
Posted on 7/6/20 at 8:56 am to BottomlandBrew
quote:
Development on Dawson Creek just downstream from Acadian. Knowing how EBR DPW operates, they probably approved plans that didn't adequately address runoff from the new developments. This backs up Dawson Creek and it back floods along Acadian.
I’ve rented one of those storage office warehouses down Dawson off Balis for years and will say that even during the 2016 flood it never really came close to topping the edges.. the problem was always further down stream when you got into the residential areas.. I do worry about the new units built in the past year.. How they were allowed to build up so high is beyond me... one side is a good few feet above the homes which are within a few feet of the units.. those homes are going to suffer
Posted on 7/6/20 at 8:58 am to TROLA
They need to find vacant land or Brec parks along the creeks and use some of the land as overflow or swamp to temp reduce the amount of water in the creeks until the water flow can go down.
It is not 100%.
If it could reduce the flow of water in a creek by a few feet that might help.
It is not 100%.
If it could reduce the flow of water in a creek by a few feet that might help.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:06 am to johnnyrocket
quote:
Vacant land or BREC parks
The Metro Council and “Planning” commission have continued to allow this land to be overbuilt by developers, especially along Burbank (the Bayou Fountain problem). Most notably, the BREC property across from, and next to, the BREC soccer complex. These areas impounded a TON of water and are in the process of all being paved. The Metro Councilman supposedly representing this area works for Gordon McKernan and hasn’t attended a Council meeting for several years, meanwhile, developers with very questionable track records are slamming in houses and apartments that aren’t needed as Broomhilda accelerates the movement to the AP and LP.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:10 am to wasteland
quote:
Ever since the whole area around Trader Joe’s was developed
That area was developed years before trader joes etc. It was walmart and books a million. I cant see how that is the source.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:19 am to dagrippa
I agree it is just a perfect storm.
- DPW has not maintained ditches
- overbuilt around areas that are or were swampland.
- no real plan to help reduce runoff by taking land sold in Burbank to developers it should have been used as a natural overflow area.
Then EBRP is mad at Iberville Parish for trying to reduce flooding caused by EBRP.
Why has no one thought of dredging Bayou Manchac to close to the Miss River levee?
Install huge pumps that can pump water both ways. One way to pump water out when needed. The other way to help keep water circulation in the Bayou during low water periods to help with the fishery.
- DPW has not maintained ditches
- overbuilt around areas that are or were swampland.
- no real plan to help reduce runoff by taking land sold in Burbank to developers it should have been used as a natural overflow area.
Then EBRP is mad at Iberville Parish for trying to reduce flooding caused by EBRP.
Why has no one thought of dredging Bayou Manchac to close to the Miss River levee?
Install huge pumps that can pump water both ways. One way to pump water out when needed. The other way to help keep water circulation in the Bayou during low water periods to help with the fishery.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:28 am to johnnyrocket
quote:
Why has no one thought of dredging Bayou Manchac to close to the Miss River levee?
Install huge pumps that can pump water both ways. One way to pump water out when needed. The other way to help keep water circulation in the Bayou during low water periods to help with the fishery.
It’s embarrassing to see how they let Manchac west of Alligator Bayou become. It’s not even a good canal anymore. It’s trashy and overgrown. Some have even put in pipes and built driveways ftom South to North. It’s hard to imagine Manchac was once a vital transportation waterway.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:42 am to TROLA
Agreed. No idea how they were allowed to build up that new spot because you know it's going to flood those houses that have been there and now can't drain to the canal. Another case of money talks and bs walks.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:54 am to LSUcdro
quote:
Have they sued the city?
For? The city doesn't control rainfall intensity.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:57 am to johnnyrocket
quote:
Why has no one thought of dredging Bayou Manchac to close to the Miss River levee?
It has been considered. It's always a matter of cost.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 10:03 am to Icansee4miles
quote:
I suspect that Dawson’s Creek, like Bayou Fountain, is getting backed up because they have no place to go as development closer to the EBR/Ascension line continues unchecked and all the runoff overcomes the bullshite retention ponds in these new developments.
But hey, a few developers (and likely a few Metro Council and Planning Commission members) have made bank.
fricking this.
When you zoom out and look at the fact that the USDA loves to hand out zero percent down loans for rural housing development (and the young people who continuously take advantage of them) it’s almost as if the government wants the flooding.
This post was edited on 7/6/20 at 10:06 am
Posted on 7/6/20 at 10:11 am to Jester
quote:
It has been considered. It's always a matter of cost.
The parishes along the Amite River were supposed to maintain and dredge the Amite since the 1950s. Of course they didn’t.
I’d bet they were to maintain Manchac too and of course they didn’t.
Last year a plan was announced to use EBR and State dollars to capture federal dollars to dredge and widen 66 miles of canals in EBR. The work was slated to start this year.
Anyone know if they’ve begun work?
Posted on 7/6/20 at 10:20 am to Parmen
quote:
This. It seems when BLM needs something, SWB and Latoya the Destroya move quickly. Pot holes and drainage? That's an issue for the next administration.
They should just have a truck, or a fleet, driving around all the time filling pot holes and clearing out obvious drainage issues. No need for layers and layers of bureaucracy ("work orders") to do it.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 10:26 am to SaintsTiger
The intensity of this rainfall right now makes me think they are going to flood again today.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 10:26 am to doubleb
I know that there was a study commission formed based on Bodie White’s legislation from 2018 or 19 to address basin wide drainage issues in the Amite/ Manchac basin. It’s definitely a basin wide issue, and there have been a number of bad decisions made locally, by many, that have made this a huge problem. It sounds a lot of you guys are in the know on this. And it’s even worse if you consider that when the lakes are full and backing up from storm surge, the Amite has no place to go, and in fact, starts heading backwards. Also the major cause of flooding on the Northshore rivers and much of New Orleans troubles (besides their self inflicted ones). It’s almost like a giant pumping system needs to be put into place near where the Bonnet Carre is to pump from the lake back to the river during storm events, but that seems like an engineering impossibility.
The real solution is to stop allowing unchecked development in areas that shouldn’t be developed (Burbank corridor) and to quit thinking a couple little pissant retention ponds will keep new developments from flooding everything around and downstream of them.
The real solution is to stop allowing unchecked development in areas that shouldn’t be developed (Burbank corridor) and to quit thinking a couple little pissant retention ponds will keep new developments from flooding everything around and downstream of them.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 10:37 am to Icansee4miles
quote:
The real solution is to stop allowing unchecked development in areas that shouldn’t be developed (Burbank corridor) and to quit thinking a couple little pissant retention ponds will keep new developments from flooding everything around and downstream of them.
The Burbank Corridor, and Bayou Fountain had nothing to do with what happened yesterday at Dawson’s Creek. It had nothing to do with flooding from Claycut Bayou north. In 2016 there was some flooding along Burbank but nothing like what happened elsewhere in the parish.
Now could continued, unrestricted building change that? Certainly, and knowing how things go in this parish it probably will.
Popular
Back to top


1






