Started By
Message

re: Some sicko is trying to make a flag for pedos

Posted on 4/26/23 at 4:20 pm to
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
54411 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 4:20 pm to
6 downvotes. Bet I can guess what OT Pedos did that.
Posted by cyarrr
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2017
3745 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

Good Lord. Forget banning, castrate that fool.


And the 2300 who are following his twitter feed.
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
69628 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 4:30 pm to
Democrats will insist on this flag being flown on a yearly basis or during Pride month.

OT Moderates will ask why you care or what’s the big deal?
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
68834 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 4:34 pm to
frick it. Let’s at least get these sick fricks out in the open. MAYBE this can be the hill that wakes some normal people up.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
68834 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

The question then becomes once progressives "normalize" having sex with children, where do they go next?


To the fricking grave.
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
25392 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

There's no reason in denying that there is a small portion of the population who are born with some sort of brain chemistry that makes them attracted to younger people.


First it was “minor attracted persons” and now it’s “youth attracted persons,” unless that was a troll account, we’re looking at the continuation of softening language to make something more palatable and acceptable to normalize behavior.

Do you have citations to literature that suggests we should stop denying such brain chemistry? If you do have citations, are they from the hard or soft sciences? Soft sciences can no longer be trusted, and unfortunately the hard sciences are becoming less trustworthy on various subjects.

Also, define younger people. There are worlds of distance between someone that might notice a physically attractive post-pubescent teenager (biologically a potential mate; socially, legally, ethically wrong) and someone that finds pre-pubescent and pubescent children attractive (abhorrent on all levels).
Posted by Dubosed
Gulf Breeze
Member since Nov 2012
7465 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

6 downvotes. Bet I can guess what OT Pedos did that.



Probably that frickin punk mmmmmmmmmbeer
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
10827 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

softening language to make something more palatable and acceptable to normalize behavior.
There are already politicians in countries pushing that since kids can know their sex, they can have it. The whole "don't say gay bill" and the like are there to protect children. Saying some kid has the wherewithal to ok puberty blockers and genital mutilation is the in that these frickers want. Laws like the one passed in Louisiana this week are not just for show they are adding a legislative step in the way of letting these frickers have easy access to children.
Posted by TheSadvocate
North Shore
Member since Aug 2020
4502 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 5:37 pm to
They'll get Don Lemons spot on CNN
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29872 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

I had to google what "Alice Day" is


I was going to ask but then I was like nope better not to know....I was right.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
21764 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 6:03 pm to
Them having their own emblem would make picking them off more easily. Ooops I meant picking them out really I did.
Posted by Ancient Astronaut
Member since May 2015
36223 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 6:07 pm to
I didn’t know Hail had a twitter
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 6:10 pm to
Kill your local pedo
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
86559 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

There's no reason in denying that there is a small portion of the population who are born with some sort of brain chemistry that makes them attracted to younger people.

It's not their fault
Yeah, not sure I’m with ya here.

I think pedos generally are freaks who can’t get arse anywhere else so they convince impressionable people(youths) to have inappropriate interactions with them.

That and some pedos are just evil fricks and know you can’t cause much more agony than to rape a child.

I don’t think these people genuinely find little kids to be more sexually attractive than adult folks. It’s just the adult folks fight back/speak up more often.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
70096 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

There's no reason in denying that there is a small portion of the population who are born with some sort of brain chemistry that makes them attracted to younger people.

It's not their fault, but it isn't to be celebrated. It's to be dealt with in the appropriate manner by professionals.



I volunteer to become a licensed professional to deal with these people in the appropriate manner



Posted by RoIITide
Member since Dec 2010
925 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

There's no reason in denying that there is a small portion of the population who are born with some sort of brain chemistry that makes them attracted to younger people. It's not their fault, but it isn't to be celebrated. It's to be dealt with in the appropriate manner by professionals. I feel bad for those people. Not the ones who act on it, but the ones who are attracted to young people and can't do anything about it. That would suck.


frick being dealt with by professionals. They need a fricking bullet right between the eyes.
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
78627 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 6:39 pm to
So wait, you have no problem believing mass shooters have a mental illness but not people who are attracted to children?


ETA I don't believe that absolves them in any way.
This post was edited on 4/26/23 at 6:41 pm
Posted by RuckMaul1
Member since Sep 2022
404 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

In a vacuum the argument of "we don't want these highly destructive people living quietly in the shadows" would make sense, and I've seen that message/argument elsewhere and always thought it to be technically valid.

But the reality is when the institutions of this country (including the government) endorse and advocate for trans ideology - something that is in many very real ways a death sentence both for the people who adopt it and, increasingly, for those who oppose it - we cannot trust those same institutions to encourage pedophiles to come out into the open to seek help to cure their disorder.



Ding Ding Ding

The devote followers who are teachers are encouraging their students to hide their transitions from their parents and take hormones. Do people honestly think this wouldn't be similar?
Posted by Kjnstkmn
Vermilion Parish
Member since Aug 2020
15938 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 9:34 pm to
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
45943 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 9:44 pm to
They had one in South Park
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram