- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Social Security's insolvency date is now a year earlier
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:36 pm to RLDSC FAN
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:36 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Will we ever fix SS?
Nope. Nobody will cut anything, the voters wont vote to cut, the politicians wont cut because the voters will get mad.
Our debt problem will never be solved and will end in disaster.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:36 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
SS is 100% an entitlement
100% would imply we didn’t pay a dime into the system. This is false
Getting welfare when you don’t even pay taxes is an entitlement
This post was edited on 6/18/25 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:37 pm to rob0710
quote:
My retirement plan is to switch to office work when my body cannot handle the field anymore. I will die working.
By then AI will have replaced 90% of office jobs. Prepare to keep shoveling.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:40 pm to fallguy_1978
quote:
quote:
At its core it's actually laughable..."we're going to take and save your money and then you'll get it back in retirement". Because government is so good with money.
The structure of it is absolutely very similar to a Ponzi scheme. The only people that made out like bandits were the first ones to collect it and not pay into it their whole working lives.
The only element missing for it to be a ponzi scheme is the fraud which must be present to make a ponzi scheme a ponzi scheme. That fraud is generally two fold.,,,,first is to NEVER return any of the investors money but to simply find more investors and pay them, the second is over exaggerating expected returns. One knows fully well where the money the receive is coming from....no one misleads us on that point. We also know full well what the expected return is....its a matter of public record and is not exaggerated in the least. I understand it sounds cutting edge to say Ponzi Scheme but the simple fact is Social Security does not fit the bill in any fashion.
The people who "make out" is the entire population of the United States. Show by a raise of hands how many of us want our aging parents living with us in retirement, the orphan from down the street or a disabled stranger. Show by a raise of hands how many of us want to live with our adult children when we retire. Show by a raise of hands how many want orphans, the disabled, the elderly and the widowed to live hand to mouth and be at the mercy of the kindness of strangers who aren't compelled by law to assist in their financial upkeep. We all "make out".
FInally, even if your parents are lucky enough to drop dead before they retire, no one in your family lives past retirement age, no one is orphaned or becomes disabled, on average everyone will collect what they have paid within 11 years of retiring. If your FRA is 67 now your life expectancy is a little over 78....that means most people live longer in retirement than it takes to collect every penny of what they paid during their lives into social security. Its better for women than men because we die earlier. Even if you are lucky and everyone you know personally dies before they retire and no one becomes orphaned or disabled strangers will do all 3 and without some modest income they will be a burden on those among us who lead charmed lives. There ain't no free lunch, unless we are willing to take in orphans with no additional income of watch as they die from hunger and exposure and become victims of predators orphans are going to be a burden on society through no fault of their own. I understand it feels good for some to say "frick 'em" but unfortunately for the sick fricks who do think that way the rest of us are compassionate and we make the rules and one of them is we are going to contribute to the income of the orphaned, widowed, disabled and elderly.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:42 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Social Security's insolvency date is now a year earlier
Impossible. We can just print the dollars if we lack payroll tax revenue.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:46 pm to Rip Torn
quote:
It was never meant to be income for retirement. It was meant to be a lifeline for those who couldn’t care for themselves due to death of a spouse or a physical disability
So do people with pensions, Railroads etc... Pay for these folks as well or is it just the Social security folks?
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:48 pm to RLDSC FAN
There's not enough fraud and waste to save Social Security. It's a ponzi scheme. It was never intended to be a retirement fund.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:49 pm to RLDSC FAN
Got my first check today. Full retirement age.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:52 pm to FLObserver
quote:
So do people with pensions, Railroads etc... Pay for these folks as well or is it just the Social security folks?
Many people with pensions, pay into those and social security. Teachers in most school districts in Georgia are an example. They pay 6% of their salary into the TRS (pension) in addition to the 6.2% they pay into social security.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:52 pm to Dixie2023
quote:
Maybe quit giving it to those who haven’t paid in? It wasn’t meant support everyone.
^This. There are two older ladies both 80 in our local community who never worked a damn day in their lives but have been drawing their dead husbands Social Security for nearly 20 years, yet my 78 year old mother who worked her arse off and paid into that shite for 40 years can only draw her check and not my father's also who died over 10 years ago and paid into it for over 40 years also. Total bullshite.
This post was edited on 6/18/25 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:53 pm to Dawgfanman
quote:
What was retirement like for middle and lower class people prior to social security?
25% of retirement aged people in the US, those who worked their entire lives, lived below the poverty line. Almost 80% of orphans did, about 40% of widows and about 80% of the disabled. That number is now around 10%, 25%, 10% and 40%. That is based on income, the same as it was before social security, it does not include items like food stamps, subsidized housing, subsidized health care etc etc etc. Those items are not considered income for the purpose of identifying those below the poverty line.
There are 2 things most people refuse to know about social security. First it is OUR frickING MONEY. It was never supposed to be used to pay for ANYTHING other than the needs, in a modest fashion, of the elderly, the orphaned, the disabled and the widowed. It has been used for other things and that is the problem...we should have never tolerated it.
The second thing is everyone single last one of us is enjoying things like national security and roads and what not because we have collectively saved OUR frickING MONEY and that money is leant to government agencies who pay us back in a modest but steady fashion. Without the Treasury Bonds that our money HAS to be invested in, by law, because it'd be a damned foolish idea to simply hide it under a mattress, we would not have a financially viable nation. That investment funds all manner of shite we expect and take for granted. Its either fund it that way, and on average get every penny back in 11 years after retirement age and not see high levels of poverty amongst our most vunerable populations OR reach in our wallets and pay as we go and never see any of the money directly again. There ain't no free lunch.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:53 pm to mule74
quote:
No. We will never fix any of our entitlements. There is zero political will.
Trump is trying, but "conservatives" are opposed to the bill that cuts entitlements.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:55 pm to The Cow Goes Moo Moo
quote:
I never understood how this is even possible without there being a significant uproar from the people who actually work and pay into SS.
Why does more $$ come out of SS than what goes in?
Because from the inception it provided and provides a modest income to those unable to earn any income - orphans, widows, the elderly and the disabled.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:55 pm to Keltic Tiger
quote:
Federal employees do not have SS deductions
I need to speak with payroll asap cause I get SS deductions taken out of every one of my paychecks
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:58 pm to RLDSC FAN
Not with half the country fighting to keep illegals on it.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:59 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Trust Fund
There Is no “trust fund”, just a virtual box full of IOU’s.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:59 pm to The Cow Goes Moo Moo
quote:
I need to speak with payroll asap cause I get SS deductions taken out of every one of my paychecks
It's a fairly common misconception. It all depends on what the agency opts to do. The feds allowed state and local agencies to opt out of social security and instead allow their employees to contribute to the state/local pension. Not every state opted out, and they have their employees contribute to both. Alabama I know does this. At the federal level, FERS does it, but CSRS does not.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 3:00 pm to Dawgfanman
FICA taxes i believe pay for alot of the social security and medicare. My only issue is why do Pensions not have to pay fica taxes to helped with disabled etc..? So people on the railroad for example will get their full retirement while people getting FICA taken out for SS will not get their full retirement when its time to retire.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 3:03 pm to msudawg1200
quote:
^This. There are two older ladies both 80 in our local community who never worked a damn day in their lives but have been drawing their dead husbands Social Security for nearly 20 years, yet my 78 year old mother who worked her arse off and paid into that shite for 40 years can only draw her check and not my father's also who died over 10 years ago and paid into it for over 40 years also. Total bullshite.
Y'all need a lawyer. Your mom is entitled to some portion of your Dad's social security.
What would you have the 80 year old women do though? Serious question. Not judging or anything but if they are alive there is a cost associated with them being alive. If they have family who can take them in that is fantastic if it is tolerable for all involved,,,,but no matter how close and committed the family is it is a financial burden for anyone, no matter their income level. The modest income provided by SS provides some relief to that burden and collectively it is almost universally approved of that we will provide some modest income to the widowed.
What if they do not have family who can take them in? This is not uncommon. They are going to be as much a burden on society either way...or we can simply let them die in the street. Again, collectively this is a very unpopular sentiment.
The fact is people have a cost associated with simply being alive. Those costs either come from their income, their families income, the rest of us or crime. Ain't no free lunch. A society in the wealthiest nation on earth who begrudges a widow a modest income is worthless as tits on a boar hog....and most Americans agree.
Popular
Back to top


0





