re: SJWs find Seinfeld offensive and unfunny.

quote:

---

My opinions regarding the left were solidified as strictly negative after the Kavanaugh fiasco.

---

How were your opinions on the right impacted as a result from what’s gone on in North Carolina or Wisconsin recently?

quote:

---

If I were to leave the house wearing a MAGA hat, especially where I currently live, the chance that I would be assaulted is as close to 100% as I can get.

---

Okay, if i wore a Hillary for President hat to an LSU game I would 100% be confronted there too.

quote:

---

Confronted, or assaulted? I think you'd get called names for sure, but I don't think you'd be assaulted.

---

Definitely a non zero chance I’d be assaulted. 100% chance I’d be confronted.

Scruff can’t say 100% he’d be assaulted, his numbers are similar even if he’s in Portland or something.

quote:

---

Okay, so you’re just going to defend your team till the end. Got it. I think we’re done here, you’re pathetic.

---

Are you going to take your ball and go home or respond to my detailed response?

You think every "hate crime" or anti-Semitic act committed in this country is carried out by some right winger with an agenda? You think that stat is the only metric we should use to make these claims of a "rise in right wing extremism"?

Will you at least entertain the thought that what I quoted from the WaPo was intentionally misleading?

quote:

---

You’re not interested in having an open conservation, you’re interested in your team and your agenda. So why bother?

---

I've rebutted honestly after analyzing your posted material

quote:

---

Even if it was, I posted 3 links. Yet your main focus was not on responding to what was by any measure a very fair and nonpartisan post on my part but instead to focus on the liberal media and largely deflecting the content so you can rationalize your dug in beliefs.

---

The only thing I've said is that the media often intentionally misleads readers and gave an example of how they do it. I'm asking you if these attacks that you posted are the only metric by which we should be judging a true rise in right wing extremism. To quote the 3rd article you posted:

quote:

---

The perpetrators of these attacks were mostly white supremacists and “sovereign citizens.” The latter category includes a loose mixture of individuals and groups that use violence, or the threat of violence, to protest government functions such as taxation. The perpetrators mostly have been lone actors and small networks of white supremacists and sovereign citizens, rather than groups.

---

"Sovereign citizens" come in all sorts of political ideologies and are in absolutely no way considered a monolithic right wing bloc. So despite saying that these attacks were "mostly white supremacists" AND sovereign citizens who are of all political stripes, they still attribute all the attacks to "right wingers". That's a dishonest representation of the facts.

quote:

---

and most likely posted by somene that is categorized as a millennial

---

Most millennials don't realize that they are millennials.

It wasn't until earlier this year I realized I was considered one. I always thought millennials were the age group before me (I'm 34).

quote:

---

I don't 100% agree with that, because I was born in 1987 and I remember living without internet, smart phones, etc..

---

I was born in 1982. I didn't have Internet in my house until I was 18 and no smart phone until I was in my upper 20s. I wouldn't say I "grew up" with any of that sort of thing.

It wasn't offensive, but it wasn't funny either.

I was wondering if some of those reactions were fake