Started By
Message

re: should TOPs recipients be required to stay in LA for a set # of years after graduation?

Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:02 pm to
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
78006 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

i thought they raised it to 3.0 and 26 (or something close to that) last year?
Not as far as the info online.
Posted by tigersownall
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2011
17202 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:02 pm to
Why would they leave? Louisiana is the shite. Can't find another state with cheap gas/cigarettes/crawfish. Don't even get me started on the creel limits.
Posted by tigabait01
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2004
4952 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:02 pm to
End the program and it's a moot point.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
61541 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:04 pm to
Cigarettes are $8 a pack baw! that ain't cheap.
Posted by tigersownall
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2011
17202 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:09 pm to
Don't go to the rouses. It's murder. I buy mine from my homies at the shell. 6.50. It actually blows my mind that cigarettes at rouses are more expensive there than my go to bar.
This post was edited on 4/20/17 at 10:10 pm
Posted by PorkChops
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
746 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:13 pm to
When this conversation inevitably comes up every year, the same solution comes to my mind. Make TOPS a loan that is forgiven once you graduate. I'm sure we would frick up the process of having loans paid back and such, but I think it would be a solid start.
Posted by robertLSU
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
429 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:15 pm to
Maybe work towards making LA more appealing for college graduates to stay in voluntarily rather than trying to force them.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
61541 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

When this conversation inevitably comes up every year, the same solution comes to my mind. Make TOPS a loan that is forgiven once you graduate
i can absolutely get on board with this. i don't see any potential downside.
Posted by urinetrouble
Member since Oct 2007
20659 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:20 pm to
Not sure if the proposed bill was the best solution but there ought to be some incentives tied to TOPS that involve staying in state after graduation. Maybe TOPS covers half your tuition and you get reimbursed for the other half after working in the state for a minimum of five years.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79794 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:36 pm to
One time deferment of 4 years to cover whatever grad school you want to do.

After that, move back or pay...with interest.

I just wonder the means available to recoup the money. 3rd party?
This post was edited on 4/20/17 at 10:38 pm
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
38468 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:37 pm to
I am definitely cool with that.
Posted by DCtiger1
Member since Jul 2009
11924 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:40 pm to
So force them to stay here and be under employed or unemployed? You guys are fricking geniuses I tell ya.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
61541 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

So force them to stay here and be under employed or unemployed? You guys are fricking geniuses I tell ya.

it's not forcing anyone to do anything.

if they decide to move to another state, they would have to pay back TOPs.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
45311 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:41 pm to
No. Make them pay for the first year and fully reimburse them during that first summer if all requirements are met. I would only do this for the first year as my guess is that's where the drain is on the system.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79794 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

So force them to stay here and be under employed or unemployed? You guys are fricking geniuses I tell ya.



No one is forcing them to take the money
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
61541 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

No one is forcing them to take the money

that too
Posted by White Bear
Homeless
Member since Jul 2014
17815 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:44 pm to
Ther shouldn't be a tops to begin with.
Posted by DCtiger1
Member since Jul 2009
11924 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:45 pm to
Why? Is it their fault that the economy in LA is terrible? So we don't want to pay to educate our college students unless they stay in shitty Louisiana?
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
61541 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

Why?
because the taxpayers are getting no ROI when everyone moves to another state.

why should the louisiana taxpayers subsidize the education of texas' workforce?
This post was edited on 4/20/17 at 10:51 pm
Posted by DCtiger1
Member since Jul 2009
11924 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:51 pm to
Change the eligibility requirements. Work on bringing other companies to the state outside of O&G. What ROI would they provide if the only jobs they can get are shite compared to Texas or other southern states?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram