Started By
Message

re: Shell to generate electricity from Mississippi River currents!

Posted on 5/10/23 at 6:58 pm to
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
71038 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

could produce about 35 kilowatts per hour


What in the flying cornbread frick is it gonna take for us to get these damn electrical nerds to use correct units?
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
71038 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

That seems really low


A 35kW natural gas turbine would be about the size of a garbage can and be WAY more reliable than this fairy dust project will ever be. It's fricking stupid. The amount of shite we waste on these feel good greenie weenie projects is absolutely atrocious
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58302 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 7:01 pm to
There's a new company trying to do this every decade.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16658 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

A 35kW natural gas turbine would be about the size of a garbage can and be WAY more reliable than this fairy dust project will ever be. It's fricking stupid. The amount of shite we waste on these feel good greenie weenie projects is absolutely atrocious

I don’t mind trying, it’s how we innovate and move forward. This one seems pretty problematic but lots of things seemed that way at some point.
Posted by mack the knife
EBR
Member since Oct 2012
4265 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 7:04 pm to
yup. gotta have enough gradient for it to work
Posted by Arkapigdiesel
Faulkner County
Member since Jun 2009
15420 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

flying cornbread frick

I'll commit that to my memory bank. I like it.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

The most efficient way is the smart way to make electricity

fa
quote:

everything else is virtue signaling bull shite.

Really?





Of note, however, is that California does not consider power generated from large hydroelectric facilities (facilities greater than 30 megawatts) to meet its strictest definition of "renewable", due to concerns over the environmental impact of large hydroelectric projects.

- wiki
Posted by Cycledude
Member since Jul 2018
2124 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 7:24 pm to
Well they are starting off small. If it’s successful, they will expand. I hope it works. It’s worked other places.
Posted by Gee Grenouille
Bogalusa
Member since Jul 2018
7570 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 7:34 pm to
quote:

This will be interesting with all the logs and drift that come down the river.


Saw a doc about someone trying this on a small scale in the hudson. Idea obviously worked, but clogged up with shite in about 10 minutes.
Posted by Arkapigdiesel
Faulkner County
Member since Jun 2009
15420 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

WildTchoupitoulas
Hydro is a perfectly fine source, but how will you power the grid with hydro? It's not possible. It is a great, reliable supplemental source.

Fossil always has done a remarkable job. Once polticians get involved, good logic falls by the wayside and we get solar panels and windmills. Once again, those are fine if used as supplemental power.

The grid needs on demand sources (fossil fuel) that follows the load demand.
Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
18790 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 7:47 pm to
We need more geographical supplemental alternative power options like this.
I will get blasted but what’s wrong with a simple hydroelectric generator in a river, a windmill offshore, or a geothermal well? It’s purely supplemental.
Fusion will be the end all solution but that’s still 50 years away. Renewables will NEVER fully power our old arse grids.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
71668 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 7:52 pm to

I can't wait to see one of those magnet fishermen dudes on YouTube hook onto one of those deals. I think they're gonna need a bigger magnet.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
41394 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

As strong as those currents are, I wonder why this hasn’t been done before?


Because it’s damn expensive to install and maintain
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
11536 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 8:02 pm to
quote:




I was there last month. There is definitely an elevation drop. I even climbed the hill to get onto the walk way where this photo was taken on the Pat Tillman bridge.



I went on the dam tour where they take you in an elevator from the top of the dam to the power station level a drop of about 500 to 600 feet. I walked into the generator room and saw the row of generator working and they had one out that they were working on. They are so heavy that they use the two cranes that they have on a track above the generators to maintenance them.



Hoover Dam is made out of solid concrete and lacks rebar because they thought rebar would eventually rust and weaken the dam. It is so well built expected to last 2-3 thousand years.
This post was edited on 5/10/23 at 8:47 pm
Posted by Tantal
Member since Sep 2012
19129 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

fish are gonna die from impeller bashing

Just put chicken wire around it, baw.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16658 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

Just put chicken wire around it, baw.

Light bulbs stacked
River catfish fricked
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
9955 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

and at what cost to get up and running, deliver, and maintain?


None of these factor into Shell's decisions as long as it is favorable for ESG.
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
26689 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 8:43 pm to
funny, i've been saying for years they should do this...
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
71038 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 8:51 pm to
If it made economical sense to do it, the river would be filled with them.

It doesn't. Even with extreme subsidizing it's a losing proposition.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16658 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

Even with extreme subsidizing it's a losing proposition.
what are they getting? I’m just curious if they’re getting doe grants, tax credits etc.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram