- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/18/26 at 7:30 pm to T1gerNate
Generative AI has been around for decades. It's just been called different things over the years.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 7:34 pm to Indefatigable
Are you still using the free version?
Posted on 5/18/26 at 7:39 pm to funnystuff
We have Claude at work. Its fantastic if you know how ot use it. Made dong analysis work and creating relevant dashboards super easy in my role.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 7:44 pm to T1gerNate
Hatz.ai is the best for business
Posted on 5/18/26 at 7:46 pm to McLemore
quote:
Claude is incredibly good when properly prompted, sources, and checked. Eta: and it’s way better now than 3 months ago. Way.
I’ll have to try it again. It’s been since before Christmas that I played with it.
It got exhausting being “impressed” with its quick analysis of a given issue, only to find out when I checked in WL that every case it spat out was fake
This post was edited on 5/18/26 at 7:51 pm
Posted on 5/18/26 at 7:47 pm to funnystuff
quote:
Are you still using the free version?
No, but it’s been since last year that I used it and haven’t really had time or reason to play around in a while.
I’ll give it another shot.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 7:53 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
I’m a lawyer
Many of our clients restrict use of AI.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 7:54 pm to T1gerNate
Only if you want to be suddenly restricted for reasons you can’t figure out and lose access to all your info and a google form is the only appeal.
This post was edited on 5/18/26 at 7:57 pm
Posted on 5/18/26 at 7:59 pm to RanchoLaPuerto
quote:
Many of our clients restrict use of AI.
Same here, and I do not use it for drafting and (as prior posts explain) I haven’t found it super great for research.
Honestly I use it more on procedural bullshite or random questions on background issues as a starting point.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 8:00 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
It got exhausting being “impressed” with its quick analysis of a given issue, only to find out when I checked in WL that every case it spat out was fake But that’s been all of the services for me, I find they’re better with the statutes, and to some extent federal case law.
It has gotten a lot better with the hallucinations. It still does it some. But it will self-check. I’ll tell it to confirm each cite and it’ll admit when it gets it wrong. Then a double check everything on WL.
After 25 years of practice I can usually spot when something seems off. So my workflow is usually to start with the best quality sources i can gather, put them in the project folder, do an initial analysis w Claude. Issue spot. Do a first draft. Then use westlaw to verify, correct, dig deeper, etc.
And yeah it’s better w statutes and feds. But getting a lot better w state law. Even when it whiffs with a cite (I find it will cite something 180 degree opposite of what I want it to support) it gets the principle close enough.
The blank-page syndrome is all but cured. Just can’t be lazy and abuse it. That’s the hard part because it’ll definitely lead you down the primrose path.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 8:02 pm to Indefatigable
Claude is one of the models that Harvey runs.
I’m not a litigator, so can’t speak to that side of things, but it’s extremely useful in transactional work/ diligence.
I’m not a litigator, so can’t speak to that side of things, but it’s extremely useful in transactional work/ diligence.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 8:03 pm to RanchoLaPuerto
quote:
Many of our clients restrict use of AI.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 8:03 pm to tylercsbn9
quote:
dong analysis
Jerry's alter?
Posted on 5/18/26 at 8:04 pm to McLemore
Very solid approach and similar to how I use it though I need to try Claude again. I’ve been mostly on ChatGPT paid but it’s just—limited—and even though I don’t use any of it, the syntax and structure of ChatGPT’s legal dialogue makes me feel like I’m drowning in an Aaron Sorkin screenplay.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 8:06 pm to AllbyMyRelf
quote:
my clients would be pissed if I wasn’t using it
This is the difference between small business/personal/individual clients and insurance companies/corporations with employees whose only job it is to scrutinize legal invoices
Posted on 5/18/26 at 8:12 pm to CAD703X
quote:
i created a MONSTER Home Assistant setup all using AI. 15+ dashboards, warnings, alerts, color changes; live map view of my robot vac as its cleaning; rachio irrigation tied into weather alerts, fitbit dash with celebration animations after reaching certain daily milestones, security camera setup; people tracking, auto-door-locking if someone is appraoching the house, smoke detector integration, garage door, weather radar loop triggered by NWS alerts coming on full-screen, special 'morning' and 'evening' dashboards..
Friggin wore me out reading your post.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 8:16 pm to CAD703X
quote:
i created a MONSTER Home Assistant setup all using AI. 15+ dashboards, warnings, alerts, color changes; live map view of my robot vac as its cleaning; rachio irrigation tied into weather alerts, fitbit dash with celebration animations after reaching certain daily milestones, security camera setup; people tracking, auto-door-locking if someone is appraoching the house, smoke detector integration, garage door, weather radar loop triggered by NWS alerts coming on full-screen, special 'morning' and 'evening' dashboards..
Just copy/paste the prompts here, brah. I need to get in on this.
Popular
Back to top


1







