Started By
Message

re: SCOTUS rules police don't need warrant to use blood drawn from unconscious drunk driver

Posted on 6/27/19 at 11:23 am to
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171955 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 11:23 am to
"Follow the law, citizen, and you won't have to worry about anything!"

It's like the "I have nothing to hide" line in response to surveillance.
This post was edited on 6/27/19 at 11:24 am
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22864 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Medics can do this now without consent, it's called implied consent.




Yes, medics can provide life saving measures without your consent. I don't think anyone thinks that's a bad idea. But, that's not even remotely the same as what's going on here.
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
59411 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 11:25 am to
quote:

unconscious drivers — "surely the most dangerous class of drivers,"


Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18702 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Interesting that Gorsuch sided with 3 libs


Gorsuch is way more libertarian than conservative so it should be expected there will be occasions he will (rightly) side with the liberals.

Gorsuch is a national treasure.
Posted by Restomod
Member since Mar 2012
13493 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 11:25 am to
quote:


Yes, medics can provide life saving measures without your consent. I don't think anyone thinks that's a bad idea. But, that's not even remotely the same as what's going on here.



I get it, I was just speaking to the terms of the blood will get drawn anyway(by the medics) and any decent ED will do a ETOH/UTOX anyway.

While I'm not for a more policed controlled state, in this situation if you avoid driving drunk it's a non issue at the end of the day.
This post was edited on 6/27/19 at 11:28 am
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22864 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 11:27 am to
Right, but the concern is not that someone is sticking a needle in your arm. It's that the government is doing it without your consent to obtain evidence that can be used against you.
Posted by jbgleason
Bailed out of BTR to God's Country
Member since Mar 2012
19841 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 11:29 am to
What if the officer beats the guy unconscious and then takes the blood?
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
12462 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Not sure how I feel. If you're behind the wheel and so drunk you pass out, then frick you. You need to be under the jail.

But I don't like police taking blood without explicit consent. And I don't like this precedent.


Seems like it should be a hell of an easy warrant to obtain... even if it wakes some people up at night to process.
Posted by Aristo
Colorado
Member since Jan 2007
13292 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 11:30 am to
If they are unconscious does medical personnel take a blood sample? If so, couldn't they just subpoena the results of BAC of the drawn blood?
Posted by Restomod
Member since Mar 2012
13493 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 11:31 am to
quote:

What if the officer beats the guy unconscious and then takes the blood?

Depends if he turns the body cam off first...

The cop will merely say he "fell" when he arrives to the ED.
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
68469 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 11:31 am to

quote:

Blood tests are the only way to reliably test the alcohol level consumed by (unconscious) drivers, Alita wrote.


Best believe I'm going to quote Sam on this if I'm ever asked to breathalyze.
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6733 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 11:32 am to
What if the police then use the blood sample for a DNA databank, would that be legal?
Posted by Restomod
Member since Mar 2012
13493 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 11:33 am to
quote:

If they are unconscious does medical personnel take a blood sample?


Yes

quote:

If so, couldn't they just subpoena the results of BAC of the drawn blood?


It's a drop of blood, used for blood glucose test. There is nothing to subpeana.

Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
43056 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 11:34 am to
By law all they have to do is ask if you consent. A good cop will ask something like “If you don’t consent say no”.

Most unconscious people will remain silent thus consenting. Open and shut case.
This post was edited on 6/27/19 at 11:35 am
Posted by Aristo
Colorado
Member since Jan 2007
13292 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 11:46 am to
quote:

It's a drop of blood, used for blood glucose test. There is nothing to subpeana.


Well there goes that theory.
Posted by Aristo
Colorado
Member since Jan 2007
13292 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 11:47 am to
quote:

What if the police then use the blood sample for a DNA databank, would that be legal?



If they book you they are swabbing you for DNA.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 11:48 am to
quote:

"Follow the law, citizen, and you won't have to worry about anything!"


You can actually hear either Judge Dredd or Robocop reciting those lines...
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
43929 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

SCOTUS rules police don't need warrant to use blood drawn from unconscious drunk driver



quote:

quote:

Drivers in Wisconsin are presumed to have consented to a blood draw simply by taking the wheel. They can withdraw that consent at the risk of losing their license, but that doesn't apply to unconscious drivers. Twenty-eight states have similar "implied consent" laws.



1. If you drink don't drive. Do the watermelon crawl.

2. No they ruled that implied consent laws are constitutional. Which is the 10th amendment at work. Driving is a privilege not a right and it is not mentioned in the constitution. It is not a slippery slope because states can regulate traffic laws as they see fit. If you don't like it change try and change the state(s) law.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46387 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Absolutely. If this is at the discretion of the cop, this will certainly be abused with little to nothing in the way to stop it.


FIFY
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53752 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

What if you pass out for another reason that has nothing to do with alcohol?
police don't know that

They should always be able to draw blood. Using it in court will be another story, but if you're passed out unconscious behind the wheel, that's always probable cause for them to draw it
This post was edited on 6/27/19 at 12:13 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram