Started By
Message

re: Scientists document evolution of new bird species

Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:10 pm to
Posted by shell01
Marianna, FL
Member since Jul 2014
793 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:10 pm to
A labradoodle will happily breed with a Labrador, a poodle, a pit bull, or Chihuahua. This new Finch species is breeding true, and even when exposed to other finches will select a mate only of its own species.
This post was edited on 11/27/17 at 1:30 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64524 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:11 pm to
Can't come up with an a tusk retort so you turn into a grammar Nazi.

Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
24003 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

The "why" of the coupling of two different types of an animal does not matter when it comes to the question I raised


Your question was answered, by myself and others. Just admit you don't understand this science or don't want to accept evolution.

Labrador and poddle = same species (Canis lupus familiaris)

Large cactus finch (Geospiza conirostris) and Medium ground finch (Geospiza fortis) = different species





Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64524 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

A labradoodle will happily breed with a Labrador, a poodle, a pit bull, or Chihuahua. This new Finch species is breeding true, and even when exposed to it her finches will select a mate only of its own species.



The article said that "two of these species came together". So I'd say the finch is not as picky when it comes to mating as you think.
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
24003 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Can't come up with an a tusk retort so you turn into a grammar Nazi.


I've answered your question twice as to why they are different things.

But I'm sure a mud-checking biker with a tenuous grasp of the English language or biology knows better than the folks over at Science on why this is important.



Edit to add: I've always been a "grammar Nazi," it's not just for you. Your questions have been answered. Accept them or move on, your continuing to harp on your "point" does not make your "point" valid.



This post was edited on 11/27/17 at 1:18 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64524 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:16 pm to
quote:




Your question was answered, by myself and others. Just admit you don't understand this science or don't want to accept evolution.




I understand it. And I understand it's bullshite that this is some sort of "evolutionary milestone". Two different types of Finches fricked and made a new type of finch. It's no different then when two types of dogs frick and make a new type of dog.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64524 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

But I'm sure a mud-checking biker with a tenuous grasp of the English language or biology knows better than the folks over at Science on why this is important.




The moment you have to resort to insults instead of focusing on the subject at hand is the moment you tell the world you've lost the debate.

Have a nice day, dipshit. My work here is done.
This post was edited on 11/27/17 at 1:19 pm
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
24003 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

I understand it.


Clearly you don't if your argument is this:

quote:

It's no different then when two types of dogs frick and make a new type of dog.
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
24003 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

The moment you have to resort to insults instead of focusing on the subject at hand is the moment you tell the world you've lost the debate.

Have a nice day, dipshit. My work here is done


Hey, man, you called me a Nazi, and I both insulted you and focused on the subject at hand.
This post was edited on 11/27/17 at 1:22 pm
Posted by shell01
Marianna, FL
Member since Jul 2014
793 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:21 pm to
From the actual paper:
quote:

Genome sequencing of the immigrant identified it as a G. conirostris male that originated on Española >100km from Daphne. From the second generation onwards the lineage bred endogamously, and despite intense inbreeding, was ecologically successful and showed transgressive segregation of bill morphology. This example shows that reproductive isolation, which typically develops over hundreds of generations, can be established in only three.


As I said, this new species is breeding only with others like it, not either of the "parent" species.
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12715 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

Still not buying it.


Then you will never understand it.
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
50270 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:27 pm to
Can it breed with a Rozy Finch?
Posted by Methuselah
On da Riva
Member since Jan 2005
23350 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

Again, the "new" species of finch has different genes than its parents. I get that. But breeding two different breeds of dogs produces offspring that likewise has different genes. Going back to my labradoodle example. A labradoodle will have different genes than a poodle due to the fact it's a mix of both poodle and lab.


No disrespect intended. You've had some great posts in military history threads. But I don't think I'll accept your assertions in this area.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64524 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

Then you will never understand it.


I understand it perfectly.


It's still bullshite that this is supposed to be some sort of evolutionary milestone.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
One State Solution
Member since May 2012
55588 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:30 pm to
Do you even believe in evolution
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64524 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

No disrespect intended. You've had some great posts in military history threads. But I don't think I'll accept your assertions in this area.


Fair enough and no sweat off my back.

Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12715 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

I understand it perfectly.


It's still bull shite that this is supposed to be some sort of evolutionary milestone.


No, you clearly don't. If you turn a labradoodle loose in a room that is a third labs, a third poodles, and a third labradoodles, it will frick anything.

If you turn this finch loose in a room of the same configuration, 9 times out of 10, it's going to frick it's own species. They observed as much in the study. Only two mated with the two parent species. The rest mated amongst themselves.

I get it, you're a lumper. Nothing wrong with that, except that you're wrong.
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
35375 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:35 pm to
Hey everyone, don't worry about what all these scientists are doing and spending their whole lives on.

Darth isn't buying it, so that means it's false. We can all move on now.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115736 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:41 pm to
The guy who says “irregardless” is definitely an authority on the matter.
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
35375 posts
Posted on 11/27/17 at 1:42 pm to


No doubt.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram