- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: School Resource Officer "Body Slams" Student Sitting in Desk
Posted on 10/28/15 at 7:58 pm to UpToPar
Posted on 10/28/15 at 7:58 pm to UpToPar
quote:
Because that's likely protocol when the teacher asks a student to leave the classroom and they don't comply. Teachers are afraid to touch students in this day and age and for good reason. Just because the SRO is called doesn't mean they are contemplating criminal charges.
so what was he arresting her for?
1
Posted on 10/28/15 at 7:58 pm to GCTiger11
C. Attention.
And I'm not mad at her. She's a kid doing kid things
And I'm not mad at her. She's a kid doing kid things
This post was edited on 10/28/15 at 8:00 pm
Posted on 10/28/15 at 7:59 pm to fishfighter
He should have done that before your English class started.
Posted on 10/28/15 at 7:59 pm to LouisianaLady
quote:
Did you go to public school? Yep.
The SRO at your school was never called into the class room for an incident between a student and a teacher?
Posted on 10/28/15 at 7:59 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
so what was he arresting her for?
Well, unfortunately, SC has a law that disrupting school is illegal. From what I can see in the news, both sides of the argument agree that law is utter bullshite and the cop did not need to be called.
Posted on 10/28/15 at 8:00 pm to UpToPar
quote:
The SRO at your school was never called into the class room for an incident between a student and a teacher?
We didn't have a cop at our school..
Still, I know they exist. And I know they exist for people's safety. Physical altercations, weapons being brought to school, etc... NOT for a kid who won't listen to their teacher.
Posted on 10/28/15 at 8:01 pm to GCTiger11
quote:
For some reason, a lot of slow people in this head rather shout RABBLE RABBLE PUSSY SJW LIBERAL HOODRAT APOLOGIST than realize no one is on the side of the girl
Correct. Calling out the cop for excessive force does not mean taking the side of the girl It's not an either / or. SOme people just don't get this.
Posted on 10/28/15 at 8:01 pm to Hangit
quote:
I am not on either of their sides because they are both wrong. She is not a princess, allowed to decide what rules she will follow and which she will ignore. And he does not get to kick anybody's arse because they are an a-hole.
Looks like we agree 100%
I hate annoying SJW's. This roidhead cop just added fuel to their fire.
Posted on 10/28/15 at 8:01 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
The student "won" IMO. She got exactly what she wanted.
yea, she woke and that day and decided it would a brilliant move to get thrown across and room and dragged by her hair.
Posted on 10/28/15 at 8:03 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
GreatLakesTiger24
How's about this? frick OFF PUNK!
UNDERSTUD THAT?
Posted on 10/28/15 at 8:04 pm to LouisianaLady
quote:
We didn't have a cop at our school.. Still, I know they exist. And I know they exist for people's safety. Physical altercations, weapons being brought to school, etc... NOT for a kid who won't listen to their teacher.
Well we did, and as multiple people in this thread have said, they are often brought in for these situations because teachers fear the consequences of any physical contact with students. They would much rather the SRO escort the student out of the class room by the arm than do it themselves.
Posted on 10/28/15 at 8:04 pm to roadGator
quote:
Why not allow all the other students on their phone during class too? Why is this girl so special that it's OK for her? Why have rules at all? Give everyone and iPad with head phones. They will all be quiet and either be playing games or doing their assignment. Who care which it is?
Because it's against the rules
You know it's possible that students can be punished without making a spectacle? I had a dude in one of my classes who refused to take a test. Threw it on the floor, and crossed his arms like a whiny little shite. Teacher didn't call anyone, carried on with class and let the kid have his attitude. Student was expelled shortly after, and I never did see him again.
This post was edited on 10/28/15 at 8:05 pm
Posted on 10/28/15 at 8:04 pm to GCTiger11
quote:
I hate annoying SJW's. This roidhead cop just added fuel to their fire.
Absolutely
Posted on 10/28/15 at 8:04 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
Oh believe me I wish we were all one happy family lifting eachother up and growing together into model citizens preaching truth justice and the American Way. Unfortunately you have a lot of agitators on the left who won't let that happen.
there are just as many agitators on the crazy end of the right so again, get off that cross.
Posted on 10/28/15 at 8:06 pm to LouisianaLady
I think when you have a child in a classroom that is disrupting everyone else's ability to learn, and that child refuses to follow the instructions to leave, that child deserves to be physically removed. Otherwise, you will have the disruptive children having control, and children that want to actually learn getting screwed over.
Now after watching the video, I'm not sure the cop needed to go as physical as he did. But just allowing the child to disrupt for the rest of the class, and then "discuss" it with them after? frick that.
Now after watching the video, I'm not sure the cop needed to go as physical as he did. But just allowing the child to disrupt for the rest of the class, and then "discuss" it with them after? frick that.
Posted on 10/28/15 at 8:07 pm to UpToPar
quote:
because teachers fear the consequences of any physical contact with students
...which only reinforces my opinion that the teacher should have let the chick do what she was going to do, inform her consequences are coming since she is not listening, and MOVE ON WITH CLASS.
These other students just went from minor disruption to their entire day of school being a waste. Sometimes "teaching a lesson" isn't as important as the other 30 kids who are still salvageable.
Posted on 10/28/15 at 8:08 pm to Festus
quote:
I think when you have a child in a classroom that is disrupting everyone else's ability to learn, and that child refuses to follow the instructions to leave, that child deserves to be physically removed. Otherwise, you will have the disruptive children having control, and children that want to actually learn getting screwed over.
Yep.
Posted on 10/28/15 at 8:08 pm to Festus
quote:
I think when you have a child in a classroom that is disrupting everyone else's ability to learn, and that child refuses to follow the instructions to leave, that child deserves to be physically removed.
From what I saw, the child was using her phone quietly. How does this disrupt the others?
Move on with class, suspend/expel her later.
quote:
then "discuss" it with them after? frick that.
Where did I say anything about discussion? You realize you can still inflict serious consequences on a student after class, right?
quote:
disrupting everyone else's ability to learn,
Let me ask you this.
What disrupted the learning more:
A. The student using her phone in class
or
B. The cops being called, shite blowing up, and the entire day of school being wasted
This post was edited on 10/28/15 at 8:11 pm
Posted on 10/28/15 at 8:12 pm to LouisianaLady
quote:
...which only reinforces my opinion that the teacher should have let the chick do what she was going to do, inform her consequences are coming since she is not listening, and MOVE ON WITH CLASS.
What kind of message are you sending if you just allow students to ignore the teachers instructions and talk to them about it after class? You say this like the teacher knew the cop was going to come in and throw the girl out the desk. I'm sure this happens all the time and I'm sure most of the time the student is escorted out of the classroom by the SRO.
Posted on 10/28/15 at 8:13 pm to Festus
quote:
I think when you have a child in a classroom that is disrupting everyone else's ability to learn, and that child refuses to follow the instructions to leave, that child deserves to be physically removed. Otherwise, you will have the disruptive children having control, and children that want to actually learn getting screwed over. Now after watching the video, I'm not sure the cop needed to go as physical as he did. But just allowing the child to disrupt for the rest of the class, and then "discuss" it with them after? frick that.
Agree 100%. The problem is that now everybody has to be PC. frick that noise!
Page 21 of 33
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News