Started By
Message
locked post

Running average of 49 worldwide antibody studies is showing a mortality rate of 0.23%

Posted on 5/7/20 at 9:45 am
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112606 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 9:45 am
This is data. This is science. From across the globe. Every study provides a link so Volgavia can poke holes in it because it isn’t as deadly as he would like (I kid I kid )

Showing an IFR of 0.23%

Seasonal flu is is 0.1% for reference


LINK
This post was edited on 5/7/20 at 9:46 am
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11987 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 9:47 am to
Twice the flu, bro
Posted by Winston Cup
Dallas Cowboys Fan
Member since May 2016
66987 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 9:48 am to
quote:

Showing an IFR of 0.23%

Seasonal flu is is 0.1% for reference

And that’s with social distancing and other effective measures. It would be reckless to allow people in Louisiana out of their homes at this time
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112606 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 9:49 am to
quote:

And that’s with social distancing and other effective measures. It would be reckless to allow people in Louisiana out of their homes at this time

I know you are being sarcastic, but social distancing has ZERO effect on a virus mortality rate I say that only because some people truly believe it
Posted by MF Doom
I'm only Joshin'
Member since Oct 2008
12050 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 9:50 am to
Mortality rate just includes people who had it right?
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46755 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Twice the flu, bro


People will still argue this, except without the sarcasm.

Posted by Slingin Pickle
Fancy side of the North Shore
Member since Jun 2008
3046 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 9:50 am to
They're already out. It's reckless to try and think we can keep them in and frick the economy.
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
59352 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 9:50 am to
quote:

It would be reckless to allow people in Louisiana out of their homes at this time



Louisiana Baws post lockdown

Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88462 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 9:50 am to
quote:

And that’s with social distancing and other effective measures.
Not sure if serious.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
132697 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 9:50 am to
Politicians making decisions believe that

As long as hospitals arent overwhelmed, mortality rate is a constant though can vary a bit based on demographics obviously
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24485 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 9:50 am to
Except the Flu kills kids and young adults and Covid does not.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Showing an IFR of 0.23%

Seasonal flu is is 0.1% for reference


So double the flu, which has a vaccine so that narrative is shot.

Still, it's not as bad as the data showed previously so we need to end this.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112606 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 9:54 am to
quote:

So double the flu, which has a vaccine so that narrative is shot.

Which narrative?
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11987 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 9:55 am to
quote:

Except the Flu kills kids and young adults and Covid does not.



Why do you want old people to die?
Posted by JetsetNuggs
Member since Jun 2014
15620 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 9:55 am to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Twice the flu, bro


Seems we overreacted if that's all It is..
This post was edited on 5/7/20 at 9:56 am
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88462 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 9:56 am to
quote:

So double the flu, which has a vaccine so that narrative is shot.
The flu having a vaccine doesn't play much of a role here fwiw. It's rarely a good vaccine when used and most people only get it because their work requires it. 0.1% for a flu season is on the low end. 0.25% the high end. And these are based on estimated numbers since the CDC makes an assumption on total cases. Most people who get the flu don't get a confirmed test much like COVID.
quote:

it's not as bad as the data showed previously so we need to end this.
The is the whole point. 0.23% mortality does NOT require the reaction it got. Nothing should have ever been closed. All we had to do was tell people to wash more, make sure they stayed home when sick, and tell the old people to quarantine in the meantime.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35406 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 9:59 am to
quote:

This is data. This is science.
No it’s not. A lot of those weren’t actually studies that were meant to extrapolate (e.g., looking at specific population infections) and were incorrectly extrapolated at that.

Of the actual studies done thus far, an actual meta-analysis that controlled for the random effects, found a 0.79% IFR with a 95% confidence interval between 0.53% and 1.05%.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112606 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 10:00 am to
quote:

No it’s not


I feel like you are awfully close to mass murdering people and injecting them with covid after to pump those numbers up
This post was edited on 5/7/20 at 10:02 am
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
175706 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 10:04 am to
quote:

This is data. This is science. From across the globe.

Problem is the mutated strain that we and Western Europe are dealing with looks to possibly be worse

We might wind up with a higher rate than the global rate due to having more fatties

And I would expect our mortality rate to go up once it starts hitting more rural areas
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram