- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Reports of multiple fatalities at an Oregon Community College
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:18 pm to CoopsjwReed
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:18 pm to CoopsjwReed
Hardly apples and oranges.
Explain your gun ban. I know your sociology professor gave you some talking points.
How much will taxes need to go up to fund your ban? You don't mind spending my money so I'm sure you have a number handy.
Explain your gun ban. I know your sociology professor gave you some talking points.
How much will taxes need to go up to fund your ban? You don't mind spending my money so I'm sure you have a number handy.
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:18 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
Just that odumbass ignores the thousands shot dead in the ghettos of America every year and chooses the "mass shootings" with usually under 20 dead as his soapbox.
Well he is the PRESIDENT of the USA, and he serves all people. The minute he panders too much to Blacks, then what is this base gonna say? They're gonna criticize him even more!
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:18 pm to Rhino5
quote:
In most Muslim based terrorist attacks religion is asked to the victims
This is insanely untrue. In most Muslim based terrorist attacks there is no two-way communication between attacker and victim at all.
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:19 pm to Rhino5
quote:
I understand you're a flaming cluess, anti American hater
Actually, I'm a concerned resident of the state of Oregon who has two family members attending schools here in Oregon.
And I didn't vote for Obama.
quote:
Leave this thread and
Sorry you're mad.
This post was edited on 10/1/15 at 6:20 pm
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:19 pm to CoopsjwReed
So ignore all the murders in the inner city to pander to Republicans??? That's your explanation?


Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:22 pm to Rhino5
quote:
In most Muslim based terrorist attacks religion is asked to the victims
In the Pacific Northwest, we lead the nation in people not identifying with a religion.
You don't have to be a Muslim to hate religious people or people of another religion.
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:22 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
I haven't said anything about the legality of a ban on handguns.
Well that lack of legality means some sort of gun-ban-by-force isn't even feasible as a starting point. You think the military could be used at the Federal level? I'll tell you that wouldn't pass Constitutional muster either. That type of thinking isn't rational no matter how you slice it. Bans are done, off the table, kaput.
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:22 pm to roadGator
This kid is a trolling clown.
But anyway, gun ban isn't the answer. Next.
The thing that makes me laugh is all the lefties saying "oh we need to do SOMETHING about guns! Idk what we should do, but guns are bad! Shootings are bad!!!! Right wing tea party!"
But anyway, gun ban isn't the answer. Next.
The thing that makes me laugh is all the lefties saying "oh we need to do SOMETHING about guns! Idk what we should do, but guns are bad! Shootings are bad!!!! Right wing tea party!"
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:25 pm to Sao
quote:
I'm lost. When has anyone, including Obama, tried to suggest an all out gun BAN??
Nobody of any import has but it comes up in the mental masturbation of folks like Lad Everett and his ilk.
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:27 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
guns are bad!
I just went and double checked on all of mine and they still haven't shot anyone.
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:28 pm to roadGator
Like I said again, I only took 1 sociology class 8-10 years ago.
And I never called for an outright gun ban. But we need massive restrictions IMO.
I would back:
1) Extensive background checks, with required mental health checkups every year.
2) Skills testing
3) Gun Ownership examinations and renewals every 1 or 2 years for the duration of your ownership
4) If the owner lives with children or by a school, 1 or 2 random gun safety checks every year
5) Punitive punishments for the owners of stolen guns. If a gun is committed by a gun registered to your name, then owner also gets prosecuted, tried and jailed for their inadequate gun control (obviously this is circumstantial)
6) Punitive fines and the loss of the ability to sell weapons by gun shop owners after X amount of their dealings end in violent gun crimes.
7) Restrict the amount donors/companies can donate to political campaigns -- only way to limit the cronnies from being influenced by their own self interests
And if my taxes had to be slightly raised to protect my liberties, sensibilites and safety, then I wouldnt give 2 shits. Having my life and having others get to celebrate our great freedoms is worth more than a couple hundred bucks.
And I never called for an outright gun ban. But we need massive restrictions IMO.
I would back:
1) Extensive background checks, with required mental health checkups every year.
2) Skills testing
3) Gun Ownership examinations and renewals every 1 or 2 years for the duration of your ownership
4) If the owner lives with children or by a school, 1 or 2 random gun safety checks every year
5) Punitive punishments for the owners of stolen guns. If a gun is committed by a gun registered to your name, then owner also gets prosecuted, tried and jailed for their inadequate gun control (obviously this is circumstantial)
6) Punitive fines and the loss of the ability to sell weapons by gun shop owners after X amount of their dealings end in violent gun crimes.
7) Restrict the amount donors/companies can donate to political campaigns -- only way to limit the cronnies from being influenced by their own self interests
And if my taxes had to be slightly raised to protect my liberties, sensibilites and safety, then I wouldnt give 2 shits. Having my life and having others get to celebrate our great freedoms is worth more than a couple hundred bucks.
This post was edited on 10/1/15 at 6:33 pm
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:29 pm to The Pirate King
LOL im a troll? okay
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:32 pm to CoopsjwReed
quote:
1 or 2 random gun safety checks every year
All I see in your list is that you just want to shite on privacy and people's constitutional rights because a small group of people commit mass shootings.
Also, your plans would cost a lot of money. Money we don't have thanks to Obama doubling our national debt.
All your thoughts still don't solve the fact that criminals by definition do not obey laws and will still have guns and kill people/each other.
Try again.
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:33 pm to CoopsjwReed
quote:Scruffy opposes every one of those.
background checks, with required mental health checkups every year.
2) Skills testing
3) Gun Ownership examinations and renewals every 1 or 2 years for the duration of your ownership
4) If the owner lives with children or by a school, 1 or 2 random gun safety checks every year
5) Punitive punishments for the owners of stolen guns. If a gun is committed by a gun registered to your name, then owner also gets prosecuted, tried and jailed for their inadequate gun control (obviously this is circumstantial)
6) Punitive fines and the loss of the ability to sell weapons by gun shop owners after X amount of their dealings end in violent gun crimes.
This post was edited on 10/1/15 at 6:34 pm
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:34 pm to CoopsjwReed
quote:
1) Extensive background checks, with required mental health checkups every year.
2) Skills testing
3) Gun Ownership examinations and renewals every 1 or 2 years for the duration of your ownership
4) If the owner lives with children or by a school, 1 or 2 random gun safety checks every year
5) Punitive punishments for the owners of stolen guns. If a gun is committed by a gun registered to your name, then owner also gets prosecuted, tried and jailed for their inadequate gun control (obviously this is circumstantial)
6) Punitive fines and the loss of the ability to sell weapons by gun shop owners after X amount of their dealings end in violent gun crimes.
1. You don't think there are background checks now?
2. Define skills testing. I may agree with you here to an extent. However, skills testing won't stop criminals. It will increase the number of center mass shots though.
3. Ownership testing? Wut?
4. Great, bigger government and more taxes. Liberals love this. I see why you want it.
5. LOL If you really believe this you are a loon.
6. see #5
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:34 pm to genro
quote:
We're gonna make them disappear through magic. And people will not be able to manufacture and sell on the black market, because of magic
Yes. The same magic that'll pay for a $15/hr min wage, universal healthcare where everyone gets the "good" doctors, medicine and hospitals, prints money out of thin air, and everybody eats unicorn pussy and shits peace and love.
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:34 pm to CoopsjwReed
Did you come up with that plan all by yourself?
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:35 pm to CoopsjwReed
My guns are none of the government's business. Never will be
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:35 pm to CoopsjwReed
It is a societal mental health problem. Something (and I'm no expert, so I don't know what) has created a society with too many lost souls. I go back to when I was in high school and no one would even think that someone was going to come in and shoot the school up. Farm boys when come to school with gun racks in their trucks - no one gave it a second thought.
College crime was largely a non-issue. The poster who commented earlier about the fact that these "I hate life" types can find similar types on the web, rather than lifting themselves out of their doldrums, might have a point.
This is ridiculous. Maybe the right is correct - maybe we are paying for our failure to teach morality. "You have rights" - true, but where are you responsibilities?
College crime was largely a non-issue. The poster who commented earlier about the fact that these "I hate life" types can find similar types on the web, rather than lifting themselves out of their doldrums, might have a point.
This is ridiculous. Maybe the right is correct - maybe we are paying for our failure to teach morality. "You have rights" - true, but where are you responsibilities?
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:37 pm to CoopsjwReed
Yep, convinced you are a troll. Pretty shitty thread to troll in though
Back to top
