Started By
Message

re: Reports of multiple fatalities at an Oregon Community College

Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:18 pm to
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
150790 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:18 pm to
Hardly apples and oranges.

Explain your gun ban. I know your sociology professor gave you some talking points.

How much will taxes need to go up to fund your ban? You don't mind spending my money so I'm sure you have a number handy.
Posted by CoopsjwReed
Miami
Member since Sep 2015
267 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

Just that odumbass ignores the thousands shot dead in the ghettos of America every year and chooses the "mass shootings" with usually under 20 dead as his soapbox.


Well he is the PRESIDENT of the USA, and he serves all people. The minute he panders too much to Blacks, then what is this base gonna say? They're gonna criticize him even more!
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
83857 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

In most Muslim based terrorist attacks religion is asked to the victims



This is insanely untrue. In most Muslim based terrorist attacks there is no two-way communication between attacker and victim at all.
Posted by BrerTiger
Valley of the Long Grey Cloud
Member since Sep 2011
21627 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

I understand you're a flaming cluess, anti American hater


Actually, I'm a concerned resident of the state of Oregon who has two family members attending schools here in Oregon.

And I didn't vote for Obama.

quote:

Leave this thread and


Sorry you're mad.
This post was edited on 10/1/15 at 6:20 pm
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
150790 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:19 pm to
So ignore all the murders in the inner city to pander to Republicans??? That's your explanation?

Posted by BrerTiger
Valley of the Long Grey Cloud
Member since Sep 2011
21627 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

In most Muslim based terrorist attacks religion is asked to the victims


In the Pacific Northwest, we lead the nation in people not identifying with a religion.

You don't have to be a Muslim to hate religious people or people of another religion.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
17797 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

I haven't said anything about the legality of a ban on handguns.


Well that lack of legality means some sort of gun-ban-by-force isn't even feasible as a starting point. You think the military could be used at the Federal level? I'll tell you that wouldn't pass Constitutional muster either. That type of thinking isn't rational no matter how you slice it. Bans are done, off the table, kaput.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
61566 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:22 pm to
This kid is a trolling clown.

But anyway, gun ban isn't the answer. Next.

The thing that makes me laugh is all the lefties saying "oh we need to do SOMETHING about guns! Idk what we should do, but guns are bad! Shootings are bad!!!! Right wing tea party!"
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
17797 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

I'm lost. When has anyone, including Obama, tried to suggest an all out gun BAN??


Nobody of any import has but it comes up in the mental masturbation of folks like Lad Everett and his ilk.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
175932 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

guns are bad!



I just went and double checked on all of mine and they still haven't shot anyone.
Posted by CoopsjwReed
Miami
Member since Sep 2015
267 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:28 pm to
Like I said again, I only took 1 sociology class 8-10 years ago.

And I never called for an outright gun ban. But we need massive restrictions IMO.

I would back:

1) Extensive background checks, with required mental health checkups every year.
2) Skills testing
3) Gun Ownership examinations and renewals every 1 or 2 years for the duration of your ownership
4) If the owner lives with children or by a school, 1 or 2 random gun safety checks every year
5) Punitive punishments for the owners of stolen guns. If a gun is committed by a gun registered to your name, then owner also gets prosecuted, tried and jailed for their inadequate gun control (obviously this is circumstantial)
6) Punitive fines and the loss of the ability to sell weapons by gun shop owners after X amount of their dealings end in violent gun crimes.
7) Restrict the amount donors/companies can donate to political campaigns -- only way to limit the cronnies from being influenced by their own self interests

And if my taxes had to be slightly raised to protect my liberties, sensibilites and safety, then I wouldnt give 2 shits. Having my life and having others get to celebrate our great freedoms is worth more than a couple hundred bucks.
This post was edited on 10/1/15 at 6:33 pm
Posted by CoopsjwReed
Miami
Member since Sep 2015
267 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:29 pm to
LOL im a troll? okay
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
175932 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

1 or 2 random gun safety checks every year


All I see in your list is that you just want to shite on privacy and people's constitutional rights because a small group of people commit mass shootings.

Also, your plans would cost a lot of money. Money we don't have thanks to Obama doubling our national debt.

All your thoughts still don't solve the fact that criminals by definition do not obey laws and will still have guns and kill people/each other.

Try again.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
75164 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

background checks, with required mental health checkups every year.
2) Skills testing
3) Gun Ownership examinations and renewals every 1 or 2 years for the duration of your ownership
4) If the owner lives with children or by a school, 1 or 2 random gun safety checks every year
5) Punitive punishments for the owners of stolen guns. If a gun is committed by a gun registered to your name, then owner also gets prosecuted, tried and jailed for their inadequate gun control (obviously this is circumstantial)
6) Punitive fines and the loss of the ability to sell weapons by gun shop owners after X amount of their dealings end in violent gun crimes.
Scruffy opposes every one of those.
This post was edited on 10/1/15 at 6:34 pm
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
150790 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

1) Extensive background checks, with required mental health checkups every year.
2) Skills testing
3) Gun Ownership examinations and renewals every 1 or 2 years for the duration of your ownership
4) If the owner lives with children or by a school, 1 or 2 random gun safety checks every year
5) Punitive punishments for the owners of stolen guns. If a gun is committed by a gun registered to your name, then owner also gets prosecuted, tried and jailed for their inadequate gun control (obviously this is circumstantial)
6) Punitive fines and the loss of the ability to sell weapons by gun shop owners after X amount of their dealings end in violent gun crimes.



1. You don't think there are background checks now?
2. Define skills testing. I may agree with you here to an extent. However, skills testing won't stop criminals. It will increase the number of center mass shots though.
3. Ownership testing? Wut?
4. Great, bigger government and more taxes. Liberals love this. I see why you want it.
5. LOL If you really believe this you are a loon.
6. see #5
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
29133 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

We're gonna make them disappear through magic. And people will not be able to manufacture and sell on the black market, because of magic

Yes. The same magic that'll pay for a $15/hr min wage, universal healthcare where everyone gets the "good" doctors, medicine and hospitals, prints money out of thin air, and everybody eats unicorn pussy and shits peace and love.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
138413 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:34 pm to
Did you come up with that plan all by yourself?
Posted by tankyank13
NOLA
Member since Nov 2012
7943 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:35 pm to
My guns are none of the government's business. Never will be
Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
25097 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:35 pm to
It is a societal mental health problem. Something (and I'm no expert, so I don't know what) has created a society with too many lost souls. I go back to when I was in high school and no one would even think that someone was going to come in and shoot the school up. Farm boys when come to school with gun racks in their trucks - no one gave it a second thought.

College crime was largely a non-issue. The poster who commented earlier about the fact that these "I hate life" types can find similar types on the web, rather than lifting themselves out of their doldrums, might have a point.

This is ridiculous. Maybe the right is correct - maybe we are paying for our failure to teach morality. "You have rights" - true, but where are you responsibilities?

Posted by Konkey Dong
Member since Aug 2013
2295 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:37 pm to
Yep, convinced you are a troll. Pretty shitty thread to troll in though
Jump to page
Page First 27 28 29 30 31 ... 50
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 29 of 50Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram