Started By
Message

re: “Renters don’t pay property taxes”

Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:44 am to
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
21496 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:44 am to
It's the second part of my sentence...
Posted by FreeState
Member since Jun 2012
3697 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 10:32 am to
Everyone is against socialism and taxes. Until it comes to their little bailiwick.

Road? Bridges? Schools? Police? Fire protection? Health units? All socialism.

I’m certainly against fraud and waste and corruption but anti-tax dickheads aren’t paying nearly as much as most of us.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41605 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 10:39 am to
quote:

It's the second part of my sentence...


You have representation.

Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41605 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 10:45 am to
quote:

You pay taxes when you buy the land. That should be it. It's absurd some people who have long since paid off their house can have their property tax bill doubled any random year. It's a lifetime tax.


For a lifetime of services.


Under your proposal, fewer and fewer people would bear the tax burden in your community as time went on.

Why should a new homeowner subsidize the services provided to their neighbor who hasn’t paid property taxes in the last 25 years?
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
17083 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 10:49 am to
quote:

anti-tax dickheads aren’t paying nearly as much as most of us.

There is a 98% chance I paid more than you, and have for decades. Property tax or income tax alone. Or combine them and shite on your argument even more.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41358 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Nice pivot. You went from “renters pay property taxes” to “property taxes influence rent.” Those aren’t the same argument.


Of course they are

At best… in a few situations, the landlord might not charge enough for the full burden

In such cases, seems like it’s a bad investment. Maybe they should sell.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41358 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 11:52 am to
quote:

Depreciation for the yearly tax benefits and appreciation for the long-term wealth building.


Ouch. Do you understand depreciation recapture?
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41358 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 11:53 am to
quote:

Property tax goes up, rent goes up


Not according to bad businessman Stout
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41358 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 11:55 am to
quote:

's the same as illegals being able to vote at our elections.


Illegals are breaking the law

What laws are renters breaking purely by renting?
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
75553 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:06 pm to
You’re proving my point without realizing it.

You went from “renters pay property taxes” to “landlords try to recover property taxes through rent.”

Those are two different statements.

If a landlord can’t recover all of his costs, that’s called investment risk. Every business has it. It still doesn’t transfer the legal tax bill from the owner to the customer.


eta: by your logic, customers pay commercial property taxes, payroll taxes, workers’ comp, insurance premiums, landscaping bills, electric bills, and the owner’s truck payment because businesses price all of those into what they sell.

At that point, words just stop meaning anything.
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 12:08 pm
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
15028 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:47 pm to
maybe not directly, but it is a factor into setting the renting price and the discussion of whether to have a rental property or not.

any smart investor will look at the cost vs the income to determine what to set the rental price at. and if the cost of renting the property becomes too high verses what the market will pay, then they will get out of the rental market.

as less rentals appears on the market, then the cost of rentals will go up absorbing the extra property taxes.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41605 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:51 pm to
Commercial/industrial tenants also do, more often than not, pay the taxes in full, regardless of what they are and regardless of what the base rental amount is.




Under most commercial leases, if the tax bill goes up, the tenant is paying 100% of that increase. If they can't/won't, the Landlord is likely within their rights under the lease to boot the tenant.
Posted by DeoreDX
Member since Oct 2010
4360 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

eta: by your logic, customers pay commercial property taxes, payroll taxes, workers’ comp, insurance premiums, landscaping bills, electric bills, and the owner’s truck payment because businesses price all of those into what they sell.


Seems logical to me. Unless the business has a 2nd business specifically just to pay all those things then yes the income from the business's customers are paying for all these things. Am I missing the gotcha moment?
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
75553 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:34 pm to
The missing distinction: funding a business isn’t the same thing as being legally responsible for its expenses.

Customers provide the revenue. Businesses decide how to allocate it.

Otherwise we’d say customers pay the owner’s salary, the owner’s mortgage, commercial property taxes, payroll taxes, insurance, landscaping, utilities, and every other operating expense. That’s just not how we talk about taxes or business costs.

The property tax bill still goes to the property owner, not the tenant. If the landlord doesn’t pay the property tax, who does the county sue? The tenant or the landlord?
Posted by JTM72
BR, LA.
Member since Mar 2014
1708 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

rent is cheaper, than a house note plus property taxes, plus insurance.


Is this a troll?

How can the rent be cheaper than the mortgage of the actual house? If a landlord does not implement all those things into the rent, costing himself money, what the frick would be the point of owning a rent house in the first place?


The goal of owning a rent house is for some sort of income. Why own something you're not using if it only costs you money with nothing to gain?
Posted by jclem11
Chief Nihilist
Member since Nov 2011
9935 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

The goal of owning a rent house is for some sort of income. Why own something you're not using if it only costs you money with nothing to gain?


The income is generally from the appreciation of the property and the tenant paying the mortgage off for you as the monthly cash flow is rather small and usually you need to save it for future repairs and make ready expenses.

Most rentals with mortgages barely cashflow over the long term factoring in potential large repairs and increasing taxes and insurance.

The people I have seen do the best renting single family homes have no mortgage on the properties.
Posted by DeoreDX
Member since Oct 2010
4360 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:51 pm to
quote:


The missing distinction: funding a business isn’t the same thing as being legally responsible for its expenses.


You're just playing with word salad semantics. Someone gives their kid $20 a week to buy lunch. Does this person pay for their kids lunch or just provided the revenue necessary for them to buy lunch?
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
75553 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:53 pm to
That is a bad analogy.

Let’s try this one more time, because we’re going in semantics circles.

When the county mails the property tax bill and, if it’s unpaid, files a tax lien, whose name is on it?

The tenant’s or the property owner’s?

That’s the answer to who pays the property tax.
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 2:05 pm
Posted by armytiger96
Member since Sep 2007
2830 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

How can the rent be cheaper than the mortgage of the actual house? If a landlord does not implement all those things into the rent, costing himself money, what the frick would be the point of owning a rent house in the first place?


If life happens and owner ends up with two house notes. The owner may be willing to accept rent that is cashflow neutral or barely cashflow positive. A few maintenance events, increase in property taxes, etc could put them in a cash flow negative situation.

Obviously, not ideal but probably happens more than you would believe. Kind of like betting, people only brag about their good investments (wins) no one talks about the times when they lose their arse.
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 2:09 pm
Posted by Cold Cous Cous
Bucktown, La.
Member since Oct 2003
15380 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 2:23 pm to
I've never paid a cent of taxes in my life- I always make my wife sign the checks.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram