- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Real Estate Etiquette
Posted on 2/22/16 at 7:45 am to joeleblanc
Posted on 2/22/16 at 7:45 am to joeleblanc
quote:
Well, care to expound why would I hire someone to find a house for me?
Because you have better things to do with your time?
Posted on 2/22/16 at 8:51 am to sean5340
That's your answer? Thats all you got?
Posted on 2/22/16 at 8:51 am to joeleblanc
quote:
Well, care to expound why would I hire someone to find a house for me? (The only case I can think of if I am moving out of state or country).
Sure,
If you're in a high demand area, say like mine, houses are on the market in many cases less than 24 hours. Our MLS does not affiliate with any feeder home sites (Zillow, Trulia, Realtor.com, etc...) so not knowing could be paramount, whereas a realtor can setup an alert thru our MLS and the second the property hits sends a notification via email.
Have a job in sales or a high level position (MD, CEO, etc...) and the amount of time spent to find a property yourself is simply not worth your time.
You are new to an area but simply don't want to rent. And for numerous reasons do not feel comfortable taking on a new housing market by yourself.
You've been burned in the past. For every post here where the realtor has been dr evil there are 2 stories where a buyer who didn't know everything got screwed and will not do it again.
Again every market is different. If I lived in Port Allen would I hire a realtor? Of course not.
Posted on 2/22/16 at 9:01 am to Theoldgraycoat
quote:
If the owner fires the realtor, no commission to be paid, genius.
I'm not a realtor or a lawyer, but I've been involved in the business in the past. the tl;dr version is that there could be legal consequences for the owner if he does that.
Property owners typically sign about a 6 month listing agreement with the realtor. Unless the owner has cause to fire the realtor, they have to wait out the contract. Even if the owner could wait out the contract and sell it, they may still owe a commission to the realtor if they sell the property to anyone that the realtor engaged.
Posted on 2/22/16 at 9:22 am to notbilly
quote:
roperty owners typically sign about a 6 month listing agreement with the realtor. Unless the owner has cause to fire the realtor, they have to wait out the contract. Even if the owner could wait out the contract and sell it, they may still owe a commission to the realtor if they sell the property to anyone that the realtor engaged.
Bingo.. If the realtor is smart enough to keep an accounting of all there listed properties and prospective buyers the Realtor has a case.
Also the Property owner would need a damn good reason to fire a realtor right away.
Posted on 2/22/16 at 9:27 am to H.M. Murdock
quote:
Residential real estate agents are literally worthless in this day of age. A decade from now their numbers will be thin.
NOT Darren James bro. Did you know on his site you can take a virtual tour of the home? The future is here now and its with darrn James!!
Posted on 2/22/16 at 9:33 am to shel311
quote:
So I don't get royally ripped off during the process?
I don't know shite about real estate nor do I have the time to figure it all out well enough to trust that I'll get everything done correctly.
I know quite a few girls that are currently realtors, all very good looking but dumb as shite. If people are leaning on their wealth of knowledg, they're probably fricked
Posted on 2/22/16 at 9:43 am to BilJ
quote:
I know quite a few girls that are currently realtors, all very good looking but dumb as shite. If people are leaning on their wealth of knowledg, they're probably fricked
As a realtor I agree with this 100%. It's an industry that attracts dodo bird soccer moms like no other. A retarded monkey could pass the real estate exam.
Posted on 2/22/16 at 10:44 am to sonoma8
I would promptly tell both of them that I wasn't doing business with either of them.
Also, 6% might have been good before the internet because the Real Estate agents had a monopoly on information and controlled all aspects of the deal. Now most folks find their own property and tell the agent they want to see it.
Then the buyers get all the data for closing together , give them to the real estate agent who provides them to the closing atty.
In essence, the buyers do all the work and turn it over to the RE agent. The sellers do to.
Is it worth 6%? I don't think so.
Posted on 2/22/16 at 10:53 am to ItNeverRains
quote:
A retarded monkey could pass the real estate exam.
Sadly, when I took the exam the girl I was next to was on her 6th attempt.
Posted on 2/22/16 at 11:33 am to joeleblanc
quote:
Well, care to expound why would I hire someone to find a house for me? (The only case I can think of if I am moving out of state or country).
You do understand that the seller pays the commission right? Why wouldnt you hire a real estate agent that is loyal to you and you are not having to pay them?
Posted on 2/22/16 at 11:59 am to Theoldgraycoat
quote:
There is literally nothing a realtor will do for you that your lender can't. Your lender will not let you get screwed over. Realtors are fricking scam artists of the highest order.
and the stupidest comment award goes to..... Please educate yourself. Lender=Loans. Realtors=Real Estate. two different worlds but one cant do without the other one.
This post was edited on 2/22/16 at 12:00 pm
Posted on 2/22/16 at 12:07 pm to Civildawg
For the life of me, I do not understand how people do not understand this. The seller pays both realtors. If you are buying a house, get representation on your side. It's pretty much free. Do not use the other realtor who has the sellers interest in mind.
And no, you will not get a better deal not having a realtor on a property listed by a Sellers Agent. Either the realtor is making dual commission or the seller is pocketing equity.
And no, you will not get a better deal not having a realtor on a property listed by a Sellers Agent. Either the realtor is making dual commission or the seller is pocketing equity.
This post was edited on 2/22/16 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 2/22/16 at 12:07 pm to ItNeverRains
quote:
For every post here where the realtor has been dr evil there are 2 stories where a buyer who didn't know everything got screwed and will not do it again
This has been my experience. I had a realtor through my company to find a home. She was wonderful. Took time to show us many different homes. Was willing to take time after work to go back and look at places we'd already seen. Was truthful about why she wouldn't care for some places. All in all a very good experience.
The realtor who sold our home was terrible. Sounds like not a big deal, but the house had a buyer before she even got it online or a sign in the yard. Problem was, she was asking us to lower the price. Seems to me if you can get a buyer in 3 days, you didn't need to budge on price. Plus we found out later that the buyer was a friend of her son's. Just a whole lot of shady things and I think we could have gotten more if we had someone really advertising our house. I didn't have to pay her fees since it was a company move, but if I did, there would have been a scene.
And when I bought my first home, it was FSBO. I have to say, it's not that difficult to go through. I could see where a problem could come up and we may have gotten lucky. But, with a home inspection, a good loan officer, and some research, we got through the process rather easily.
Posted on 2/22/16 at 1:56 pm to dlambe5
quote:
For the life of me, I do not understand how people do not understand this. The seller pays both realtors. If you are buying a house, get representation on your side. It's pretty much free. Do not use the other realtor who has the sellers interest in mind. And no, you will not get a better deal not having a realtor on a property listed by a Sellers Agent. Either the realtor is making dual commission or the seller is pockets more profit.
Never seen a place where they talk so poorly about the blood sucking greedy realtor, who will simply give away 3% of a 6% listing agreement just because an OT'er shows up and demands it.
That 3% is for a participating licensed realtor bringing in an buyer with a representation agreement in place. But if your perception is you saved 3%, then it is definitely reality.
Posted on 2/22/16 at 2:17 pm to ItNeverRains
quote:
That 3% is for a participating licensed realtor bringing in an buyer with a representation agreement in place. But if your perception is you saved 3%, then it is definitely reality.
The seller may save 3% but the buyer is not going to get a price drop or anything. Buyer will just get no representation on their side.
Most of the time in this case the realtor will act as an agent for both parties and collect the full 6%. This is negotiable of course but would you do double the amount of work at your job for half the price??
Posted on 2/22/16 at 2:48 pm to dlambe5
Uhhh
Sure bud. The lender/buyers determine market value, not realtors. The lender will schedule appraisals, not the realtor. Aside from sticking a sign in a yard and posting a listing online, all of which can be done yourself, wtf does a realtor do that is so important to real estate? The answer is nothing and the market is quickly rendering realtors obsolete. A relic of the past to be laughed at and wonder how stupid we all were for paying them.
Sure bud. The lender/buyers determine market value, not realtors. The lender will schedule appraisals, not the realtor. Aside from sticking a sign in a yard and posting a listing online, all of which can be done yourself, wtf does a realtor do that is so important to real estate? The answer is nothing and the market is quickly rendering realtors obsolete. A relic of the past to be laughed at and wonder how stupid we all were for paying them.
Posted on 2/22/16 at 3:10 pm to Theoldgraycoat
quote:
The lender/buyers determine market value, not realtors. The lender will schedule appraisals, not the realtor.
Completely wrong. Market value is determined by sales that are negotiated by the realtor. Realtors set the price of the house by providing comps from recent sales of houses with the same square footage and amenities. And Realtors not lenders schedule appraisals and inspections.
They are called lenders because they get you approved for mortgage companies that lend you the money. They are making sure you can afford the house.
Posted on 2/22/16 at 3:13 pm to Theoldgraycoat
quote:
Theoldgraycoat
Please stop...You are embarrassing yourself
Posted on 2/22/16 at 3:22 pm to dlambe5
bullshite. You're a realtor and obviously are going to defend your profession. Realtors can set the price of a property but it is the buyer and lenders/appraisers that ultimately decide the value. Don't come into this thread and be dishonest regarding your profession. I'll continue to do business without realtors and the OP should too.
Popular
Back to top



1



