Started By
Message
locked post

Question for OT lawyers.

Posted on 6/16/16 at 8:11 am
Posted by SECdragonmaster
Order of the Dragons
Member since Dec 2013
17460 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 8:11 am
This Disney/Alligator incident has gotten me thinking. I believe it would be quite easy to represent either side of this case in a lawsuit. Both sides have legitimate points and a "win" by either side would be professionally satisfying if I was a representing attorney.

What about in a totally different type of case?

How do you feel when you "win" a case in court or get/avoid a big settlement when you are 100% sure your client is at fault?

For instance:

1. You get a murder victim off on a technicality by not allowing a video in court that clearly shows him committing the murder.
2. You get a big corporation off the hook from settling a case because they have bad witnesses, etc. In this case, you know the company you are representing is 100% at fault.

You get the picture.

How do you resolve (morally/spiritually/human guilt) working for the "wrong" side?
Posted by Shexter
Prairieville
Member since Feb 2014
21755 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 8:13 am to
quote:

How do you resolve (morally/spiritually/human guilt) working for the "wrong" side?


Hookers & blow

This:








Not this:


This post was edited on 6/16/16 at 8:17 am
Posted by Artie Rome
Hwy 1
Member since Jul 2014
8757 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 8:14 am to
Lawyers have a job to do.

What do you do for a living?
Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
32977 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 8:15 am to
quote:

2. You get a big corporation off the hook from settling a case because they have bad witnesses, etc. In this case, you know the company you are representing is 100% at fault.


Having to pay a bunch of money is not "getting off." People lose jobs because companies pay settlement money out. Money is money.
Posted by LSUTigersVCURams
Member since Jul 2014
21940 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 8:15 am to
quote:

How do you resolve (morally/spiritually/human guilt) working for the "wrong" side?


By not being a pussy.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
69236 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 8:16 am to
quote:

You get a big corporation off the hook from settling a case because they have bad witnesses, etc. In this case, you know the company you are representing is 100% at fault.


Insurance defense attorneys do this every day. I'm sure getting their paycheck that puts food on the table is their justification.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
70176 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 8:19 am to
quote:

How do you feel when you "win" a case


I would think pretty good

quote:

You get a murder victim off on a technicality


Public defenders probably aren't thrilled...I think they don't mind losing. Big time defense lawyers probably are happy if not why take the case?
Posted by Tigerlaff
FIGHTING out of the Carencro Sonic
Member since Jan 2010
23178 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 8:23 am to
quote:

How do you resolve (morally/spiritually/human guilt) working for the "wrong" side?


what?
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85508 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 8:28 am to
quote:

Public defenders probably aren't thrilled...I think they don't mind losing.

What kind of retarded logic are you applying here?
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85508 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 8:44 am to
quote:

1. You get a murder victim off on a technicality by not allowing a video in court that clearly shows him committing the murder.

Almost never happens. An innocent is likelier to be convicted than a guilty go free. DAs win about 80%+ of trials in Louisiana.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87735 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 8:48 am to
I rarely represent people/companies who are 100% at fault/liable/etc.

But when you have a client that is probably more culpable than the opposition, and you manage to turn the tables due to some procedural/discovery craftiness or something similar, I still feel good about it. That's the difference between good legal representation and someone who just guides you to the middle.

But these are usually wealthy people or businesses, we're typically not ruining lives here.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
69236 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 8:56 am to
quote:

But when you have a client that is probably more culpable than the opposition, and you manage to turn the tables due to some procedural/discovery craftiness or something similar, I still feel good about it. That's the difference between good legal representation and someone who just guides you to the middle.


That's a good way to put it.
Posted by terriblegreen
Spokane, LA
Member since Aug 2011
12453 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 8:58 am to
I'm not a lawyer but I know a bunch. They love to win. They don't lose sleep over it.
Posted by Cold Cous Cous
Bucktown, La.
Member since Oct 2003
15384 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 9:17 am to
I can say with total certainty that I have never had a case where I had a client with 100% fault, who got away 100% scot free. The only time I've been on the other end was when the other party disappeared after trial - probably back to Taiwan or China, never to be heard from again. And that's not exactly an example of brilliant lawyering.
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
28324 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 9:21 am to
quote:

Both sides have legitimate points and a "win" by either side would be professionally satisfying if I was a representing attorney.



Dude a cute two year old got killed by an alligator on Disney property...there is absolutely no fricking way that gets in front of a jury.

Professionally satisfying for a lawyer means cha ching. The lawyer that represents the family of the boy will never have to work another day in his life after this settles.
Posted by Cold Cous Cous
Bucktown, La.
Member since Oct 2003
15384 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 9:33 am to
quote:

Dude a cute two year old got killed by an alligator on Disney property...there is absolutely no fricking way that gets in front of a jury.

From Disney's perspective, the PR damage from nonstop CNN coverage would be much worse than whatever award the jury might give.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
86393 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 9:37 am to
And any Plaintiff's lawyer worth his weight in gaudy pinky rings absolutely knows that.

That case is a lottery ticket walking around. Supposedly there were signs warning not to swim, but Disney wants no part of this playing out in the media.
This post was edited on 6/16/16 at 9:37 am
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
28324 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 9:43 am to
quote:

From Disney's perspective, the PR damage from nonstop CNN coverage would be much worse than whatever award the jury might give.



Disney cant control the bad press, but they absolutely can control jury exposure and they will.

Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179888 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 9:48 am to
quote:

I believe it would be quite easy to represent either side of this case in a lawsuit. Both sides have legitimate points and a "win" by either side would be professionally satisfying if I was a representing attorney.


so defending OJ you're an a-hole but defending the gator, you're professionally satisfied.
Posted by FearTheFish
Member since Dec 2007
4556 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 10:10 am to
quote:

How do you feel when you "win" a case in court or get/avoid a big settlement when you are 100% sure your client is at fault?


I feel like I did my job better than the other side did their job.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram