Started By
Message

re: Qantas cancels orders for Airbus A380

Posted on 2/7/19 at 1:24 pm to
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29233 posts
Posted on 2/7/19 at 1:24 pm to
Read the other Emirates might also be wanting to swap their order of A380s out with a different plan. This would be the end of that plane.

Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
15726 posts
Posted on 2/7/19 at 9:54 pm to
4 engine market is mostly dead. A twin engine can do everything you need. The 777X is Boeing’s response to the death of the 747. They can pack 400 in a 777-9x.
Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
31929 posts
Posted on 2/7/19 at 9:59 pm to
Max is that you?
Posted by RedFoxx
New Orleans, LA
Member since Jan 2009
6025 posts
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:25 pm to
Qatar Airways is replacing their 380s with the 777X in the next few years.

quote:

The 777X will replace the A380 on routes, including to Australia” Al Baker exclusively revealed to Aviation Analyst.


LINK
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134887 posts
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:30 pm to
So what's their competitor for the 777/787?
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

what's their competitor for the 777/787?

they don't have anything, they got their market share by giving away airplanes
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17152 posts
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

Doubts about the future of the Airbus A380 have grown after yet another airline canceled an order for the superjumbo jet. Australia's Qantas (QABSY) said Thursday that it had scrapped longstanding plans to buy eight more of the double-decker planes. The A380 has been a major disappointment for Airbus (EADSF), racking up less than a quarter of the sales the European company forecast when it first introduced the giant jetliner more than a decade ago. The underwhelming demand has fueled questions about how long the manufacturer can justify continuing production of the iconic aircraft. Airlines like Qantas have shifted their interest to lighter, more fuel efficient passenger jets.


#Boeing #Merica #Dreamliner etc, etc.



I remember at the time people were questioning Boeing's strategy. Well played execs, well played
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
34241 posts
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

They can pack 400 in a 777-9x.


...and fly n/s from LHR-SYD
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

They can pack 400 in a 777-9x.


could get more than that but long haul flights not typically configured for high density seating
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134887 posts
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

they don't have anything, they got their market share by giving away airplanes

They don't have a skunkworks dept or anything?
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

They don't have a skunkworks dept or anything?


it's a consortium of UK, Germany, and France, or at least that's the way they began, their product is vastly inferior to Boeing
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134887 posts
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:44 pm to
Saw a show on their final assembly facility in Toulouse. They haul huge chunks of the plane by truck through a narrow corridor in the middle of town to get to the plant. It's the most inefficient thing I've ever seen. It almost looks like something that would happen in LA
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

They haul huge chunks of the plane by truck through a narrow corridor in the middle of town to get to the plant.


they also ship large fuselage parts in canals by barge to assembly plants
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134887 posts
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:46 pm to
So what makes it so inferior to Boeing?
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

So what makes it so inferior to Boeing?

inefficient wing, poor power to weight, flight management system is like a Tandy 1000 compared to the Honeywell used on Boeing, it's really dumbed down and that it was designed for "certain" markets really reflects that, was designed more or less to "protect" itself from (inexperienced, poorly trained,)pilots
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134887 posts
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

was designed more or less to "protect" itself from (inexperienced, poorly trained,)pilots

By using independently operated joysticks?
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

By using independently operated joysticks?


no, it's fly by wire, everything in the cockpit is basically a computer mouse, and each stick has a take over push button to take control from the other pilot
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134887 posts
Posted on 2/12/19 at 5:01 pm to
I thought one of the issues with the AirFrance crash was the two joysticks were cancelling each other out
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 2/12/19 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

I thought one of the issues with the AirFrance crash was the two joysticks were cancelling each other out


that was only part of the problem, the stick inputs add each other algebraically to an extent, which means that if they are moved in opposite directions simultaneously they will null each other out
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134887 posts
Posted on 2/12/19 at 5:30 pm to
So are Boeing and Airbus the only real players in the game these days?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram