- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Prove me wrong - John Lennon was a piece of crap
Posted on 12/9/21 at 11:48 am to 777Tiger
Posted on 12/9/21 at 11:48 am to 777Tiger
quote:
the Beatles weren't some "boy band" as a lot on here say
They kind of were their time's version of a boy band to start out, and once they got rich and famous and started doing drugs, instead of falling apart and fading away, they actually got better.
2
Posted on 12/9/21 at 11:48 am to AlxTgr
quote:
He is also the only member who does not have a solo song better than all the Beatles songs.
What does that even mean?
Are you saying they each (outside of John) have a song that is better than every single Beatles song in existence?
Posted on 12/9/21 at 11:53 am to ShockTroop
quote:
Beatles were garbage too.
Hank Jr > all others, baw!
Posted on 12/9/21 at 11:53 am to ShockTroop
Judge not lest ye be judged or something like that. Beatles made some good music, but the Grateful Dead is was still better.
Posted on 12/9/21 at 11:54 am to AlxTgr
????????
Posted on 12/9/21 at 12:01 pm to deeprig9
quote:
their time's version
maybe, but that's a bit of a stretch, "boy bands," and the same applies to the girls from the Disney stable, were pre-fab, pre-hyped, and introduced as some sort of established acts, not real musical groups by any stretch, certainly not talented musicians or songwriters, they were sort of just all of a sudden "out there," that none are surviving the test of time kind of shows the "artistic" impact they've left
This post was edited on 12/9/21 at 12:07 pm
Posted on 12/9/21 at 12:05 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
He is also the only member who does not have a solo song better than all the Beatles songs.
Huh? Where is this chart that has all of these songs ranked and who made it?
I'd put Watching the Wheels, Woman, Jealous Guy, and a few others up against any solo work from the rest.
Paul recorded Say, Say, Say and Ebony and Ivory. Probably the lamest/weakest songs ever recorded by any of them.
And what's Ringo's great song?
Posted on 12/9/21 at 12:07 pm to deeprig9
quote:
They kind of were their time's version of a boy band to start out, and once they got rich and famous and started doing drugs, instead of falling apart and fading away, they actually got better.
Boy bands don't play instruments, rarely, if ever, write their own songs, and do choreographed dance moves onstage. The Beatles weren't a fricking boy band. People sound really idiotic when they say things like this.
Posted on 12/9/21 at 12:10 pm to ShockTroop
Piece of shite? Maybe. But Happy Xmas is a damn good Christmas song though.
Posted on 12/9/21 at 12:11 pm to ShockTroop
Absolutely correct.
Posted on 12/9/21 at 12:14 pm to ShockTroop
Lennon had the GOAT wasn’t-expecting-that Green Card photo.
Posted on 12/9/21 at 12:17 pm to DaleGribble
quote:
Boy bands don't play instruments, rarely, if ever, write their own songs, and do choreographed dance moves onstage. The Beatles weren't a fricking boy band. People sound really idiotic when they say things like this.
Today's version of a boy band, you are correct. For their time period coming up in late 50's early 60's, they weren't very far from their time's version of a boy band- all matching outfits, catchy pop tunes with plenty of sock-hop cover songs in the mix, 95% of their fans were squealing teenage girls, etc. That's how they started, before breaking the mold.
This post was edited on 12/9/21 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 12/9/21 at 12:19 pm to ShockTroop
The best thing I can say about John Lennon is the day he died he became a good communist.
Posted on 12/9/21 at 12:20 pm to deeprig9
They were like a boy band in the period of 1962-1965 in the way the Epstein molded their image and, yes, sound to appeal to girls in the same way Lou Pearlman did with Backstreet Boys and *NSYNC.
If wasn’t until Revolver in 1966 when they decided to become studio rats that they REALLY became the Beatles that musicologists love so much.
If wasn’t until Revolver in 1966 when they decided to become studio rats that they REALLY became the Beatles that musicologists love so much.
Posted on 12/9/21 at 12:20 pm to ShockTroop
He was a hypocrite
And a poor father.
I don’t hate him, but I’ve never understood his appeal, aside from the anti-war and pro-peace stuff
And a poor father.
I don’t hate him, but I’ve never understood his appeal, aside from the anti-war and pro-peace stuff
Posted on 12/9/21 at 12:22 pm to ShockTroop
Never heard of Lennon..
Stones Rule
Stones Rule
Posted on 12/9/21 at 12:23 pm to ShockTroop
quote:
Woman beater and dead beat dad amongst other things. Beatles were garbage too.
no argument here.
Posted on 12/9/21 at 12:24 pm to jaytothen
quote:
Beatles are the most overrated band of all time.
You should change your name to Mean Mr. Mustard!
Posted on 12/9/21 at 12:24 pm to Saint Alfonzo
quote:
commie shitbag.
His politics would fall under slightly left-of-center now.
He wad far from a commie.
Posted on 12/9/21 at 12:25 pm to deeprig9
quote:
What was George's?
What is Life
quote:
What was Ringo's?
It Don't Come Easy
quote:
What was Paul's?
So many. Jet, Junior's Farm, Admiral Halsey, Band on the Run.
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News