Started By
Message

re: Private schools aren't better at educating kids than public schools, study says

Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:02 pm to
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
76780 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:02 pm to
study performed by public school grads?
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43031 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:03 pm to
I wonder if they tracked poor kids on scholarship to expensive private schools? Or maybe more wealthy kids who went to shitty public schools?

I went from a private school to a public school in Jefferson Parish, and I was at least two years ahead of my classmates. The teachers didn't even require me to do any work. I just sat there and did whatever, or got up and walked around when I felt like it. There was absolutely no teaching going on.

On the other hand, I know of two lower income kids who transferred to a good private school. They had to be tutored in order to catch up, but ended up graduating at the top of their classes.


Education is a product of environment....that's it
Posted by yellowfin
Coastal Bar
Member since May 2006
99037 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:04 pm to
Of course they aren’t. Most people know they are better because of the superior students
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
53816 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

I went from a private school to a public school in Jefferson Parish, and I was at least two years ahead of my classmates. 

I went to private school through 10th grade but graduated from an EBRP public school. The private school was vastly more difficult. I coasted through 11-12th grade.
Posted by ZeekFreak
Member since Jun 2017
616 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:07 pm to
I went to both, I would agree. I've saw wayyyyyyyyy more illegal drugs at a private school(on campus) as well.
Posted by GeeOH
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2013
13376 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:07 pm to
The private school my daughter attends has ALL requirements to graduate from a public school completed by their junior year.
Less than 90 kids recieved over $5M in schollys. Feel free to pick any public school in the nation and take their top 100.

I'm sure there are some private schools that don't have that high of academics programs, but they do control enrollment and their own rules.
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
62139 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:08 pm to
Any veteran teacher, public or private, can tell you this without a study.
Posted by Ric Flair
Charlotte
Member since Oct 2005
13879 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:12 pm to
Only 1,000 or so kids were included in the study? It’s not they are studying efficacy of x chemo on y type of cancer, and had limited availability of people to study.
Posted by Barbellthor
Columbia
Member since Aug 2015
11577 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

University of Virginia researchers who looked at data from more than 1,000 students found that all of the advantages supposedly conferred by private education evaporate when socio-demographic characteristics are factored in.

Is this a race thing then?

Look, a child in private school is more likely to have more involved parents, the most important factor. Therefore, a child in private school will more likely succeed, be it from the school itself or general parental involvement. In the meantime, this research gives a telling story as to demographics and parental involvement, apparently.
Posted by Ric Flair
Charlotte
Member since Oct 2005
13879 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:16 pm to
I would argue parents IQ is more important than parental involvement. Although they typically are correlated together.
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6756 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

all of the advantages supposedly conferred by private education evaporate when socio-demographic characteristics are factored in.
Isn't that 90% of the reason most kids go to private school? Isn't that also like not mentioning the elephant in the room.
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43031 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:25 pm to
IQ is definitely not a predictor of school performance. Schools do not teach to student's passions or strengths. Schools teach every kid the same way, so parental involvement is a much better predictor of school performance
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
62139 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

The private school my daughter attends has ALL requirements to graduate from a public school completed by their junior year. Less than 90 kids recieved over $5M in schollys. Feel free to pick any public school in the nation and take their top 100.

I'm sure there are some private schools that don't have that high of academics programs, but they do control enrollment and their own rules.


Are you just willfully missing the point?
Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
17102 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:29 pm to
Not sure I'm buying this.

I went to private school K-7 then public school till college. High school was a joke.

I was absent 30+ days my junior and senior year, routinely slept through class, and voluntarily took an F in welding class so I could sleep during 1st period, yet I still graduated with honors.
Posted by Lsuhack1
Member since Feb 2018
866 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:35 pm to
In Baton Rouge this year there were ten students that made a perfect score on their act. 5 of them came from BR magnet, which gets to cherry pick from the top performers of 40,000 potential students and 5 from Catholic of BR.
The point is that there are families that support those kids in many other schools weather it is St. Josephs, Chapel Trafton, Parkview baptist, etc... that take great pride in their children's education. So my point is that school environment and structure makes a huge difference on how kids perform, regardless of at home.
Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
17102 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:37 pm to
Also I'm sure location plays a HUGE role. Public schools in some inner cities aren't even comparable to public schools in some suburbs.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
88009 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:39 pm to
We don't have a school problem. We have a raw materials problem.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91871 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:40 pm to
I've been saying this on here for a while. Public schools in LA are trash mainly because most of the good kids have been removed.
This post was edited on 7/30/18 at 1:41 pm
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
53816 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

I've been saying this on here for a while. Public schools in LA are trash mainly because most of the good kids have been removed.

So if you lived in BR or Nola would you be willing to start reversing that trend and put say your 16 year old daughter in Broadmoor?
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
62139 posts
Posted on 7/30/18 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

went to private school K-7 then public school till college. High school was a joke. I was absent 30+ days my junior and senior year, routinely slept through class, and voluntarily took an F in welding class so I could sleep during 1st period, yet I still graduated with honors.


That's because many public schools have been forced to lower the bar substantially just to keep respectable graduation rates. I'm in middle school, and if I was able to teach my class on level, with a high level of expectations for student performance, more than 2/3 would fail, easily.

At that point parents would be at the school swarming on administrators about how I was being unfair to their child.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram