Started By
Message

Peacock being forced on YouTube Premium subscribers

Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:29 am
Posted by LSUneaux
Metairie and MAGA AF
Member since Mar 2014
5034 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:29 am
LINK

NBCUniversal and YouTube have reached a multiyear deal that will see Peacock ingested into the platform for YouTube Premium subscribers in the U.S.

Slated for early 2027, all Peacock content — including sports like the NFL and NBA, Universal films and Bravo originals — will be included in YouTube subscriptions.

The partnership comes weeks after Comcast announced NBCUniversal would split from its parent company.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
132406 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:30 am to
But not youtubeTV right?

Every time I cancel peacock they offer me a year for like $20 so i do it
This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 11:31 am
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
23460 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:30 am to
For a while it was more convenient and cheaper to cut the cord. Now companies have become money hungry and changed to a system where you essentially need multiple streaming platforms to watch what you want, and the combination is more expensive than cable. Back to the high seas for me.
This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 11:32 am
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
94426 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:31 am to
i am so glad i cancelled cable 10 years ago. i cant imagine playing the hokey pokey with all the pissing matches going on between content creators and providers.

what a disaster. this is why IPTV has become so popular.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
33269 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:32 am to
They had better leave my Premium Lite the frick alone.
Posted by JerryTheKingBawler
South of Memphis
Member since Jan 2023
9207 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:33 am to
A win for the common man, but why not just bundle Youtube Premium with YoutubeTV?
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
69737 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:34 am to
Somebody posted a good rant on the MSB earlier this year where the guy is basically like "I just want to get back to my cable package from ten years ago."
Posted by Shexter
Prairieville
Member since Feb 2014
21544 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:34 am to
Posted by LSUneaux
Metairie and MAGA AF
Member since Mar 2014
5034 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:35 am to
I gave up cable 4 years ago and got YouTubeTV. Well I gave that up 3 weeks ago saving $91/month. Now I’m down to just Prime and YouTube Premium. I will be royally pissed if they radically raise the price for Premium. The whole reason that I have it is to avoid the ads. Offering just an ad free experience isn’t good enough.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
132406 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:49 am to
quote:

Somebody posted a good rant on the MSB earlier this year where the guy is basically like "I just want to get back to my cable package from ten years ago."


I miss my directTV circa 2005 that was like $75 a month for 3 TVs most all channels including HBO and I always got Sunday ticket free because I threatened to cancel
This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 11:50 am
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
94426 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:49 am to
i mean i guess we're probably missing something but i haven't had a cable or streaming bill in a decade. i see things like $91/mo and my mind boggles.

imagine in 2026, paying $91/mo for ad-supplemented content. i just cant wrap my head around it. throw in internet bill and cell phone bills and its ridiculous how much we are paying for ....shite.

Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
22152 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:50 am to
quote:

you essentially need multiple streaming platforms to watch what you want, and the combination is more expensive than cable.

Can you not just juggle between the different platforms one month at a time? I have a family of 5 and we have Netflix, Prime, Paramount, Disney+ & AppleTV.

We only pay $21.94 for Netflix, $13.99 + tax for Paramount (still in intro window). AppleTV & Disney+ are free through my cell phone plans, and I consider Prime free because we have the membership because of the shipping

I don't have streaming now, but may go back to YTTV during football season, TBD. But to compare to a cable package, I would be looking at the $140 plan for the channels I need
This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 11:55 am
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
132406 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:50 am to
quote:

imagine in 2026, paying $91/mo for ad-supplemented content. i just cant wrap my head around it. throw in internet bill and cell phone bills and its ridiculous how much we are paying for ....shite.


Well yeah because you are stealing

Do you hide a pack of steaks in your jacket when you go to store?
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
94426 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:52 am to
Posted by aubiecat
Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
6097 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:52 am to
quote:

A win for the common man, but why not just bundle Youtube Premium with YoutubeTV?


I would subscribe to YouTube TV if they did that. Currently, I'm just on YouTube Premium.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
94426 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:55 am to
quote:

Well yeah because you are stealing


FIX YOUR frickING BUSINESS MODEL LIKE SPOTIFY AND APPLE MUSIC DID WITH MUSIC AND MAYBE PEOPLE WOULD QUIT WORKING AROUND THE ISSUES.

online streaming is absolute shite and then having to sit through 3 minutes of ads every 7 minutes on top of that is the icing on the cake.

your product frickING SUCKS so don't get mad at me because i can binge 4 seasons of FROM without a single ad or hiccup-d connection or fear they're going to remove it from streaming service Y before i'm done.
Posted by LSU Coyote
Member since Sep 2007
56762 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:57 am to
Ill take it for UFC.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
132406 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:58 am to
I think youtubeTV is a pretty great product.

Will be even better once ESPN unlimited is integrated into it this fall
Posted by Odysseus32
Member since Dec 2009
10137 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 11:59 am to
Price was never the main complaint. Or it shouldn’t have been.

It’s ads, contract length, and quality of programming.

It’s crazy to me how people get so stuck on the price point. Yeah if you have multiple streaming services, it’s more expensive.

If you have 2 or 3 it’s cheaper,
You have more content, you have better shows overall (you only saw the cream rising to the top with cable), and you aren’t locked in.

It’s way better.
Posted by redneck hippie
Oklahoma
Member since Dec 2008
6446 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

this is why IPTV has become so popular.


Does IpTV work well with local sports? I’ve used KODI off and on over years but it’s wonky and half the addons don’t work or go extinct. It’s not really point and click like YouTube TV or Netflix
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram