- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Panel rejects $800 million 'inner loop' plan to help ease Baton Rouge traffic
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:38 pm
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:38 pm
21
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:39 pm to TigerRob20
Will they accept my sincere frick YOU?
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:39 pm to TigerRob20
oh well, wait to the next study in 2025.
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:40 pm to Napoleon
quote:
oh well, wait to the next study in 2025.
I may still be sitting in traffic
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:41 pm to TigerRob20
Well, no shite.
Time for another expensive study!
Time for another expensive study!
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:42 pm to TigerRob20
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:44 pm to TigerRob20
I need to get in on proposing solutions and drafting studies.
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:44 pm to TigerRob20
Mother. frickers.
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:44 pm to TigerRob20
800 million would get us a new bridge...
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:45 pm to TigerRob20
What was their counterplan?
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:46 pm to wickowick
Hahaha, that is why Baton Rouge will continue to suck. You would think it was a city in Mississippi by how well it manages to hold itself back.
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:46 pm to TigerRob20
quote:
The panel can reject the plan, give its OK to move the proposal to the next step or seek more time to review it.
“They are not deciding yes or no on the project,” said Jeff Burst, project management director for the state Department of Transportation and Development.
“What they are doing is (asking), ‘Do we have enough information that it seems reasonably feasible to move to the next phase?’” Burst said.
Now where have I hear this?
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:46 pm to wickowick
quote:
I need to get in on proposing solutions and drafting studies.
Holy frickin cow. Why? Boggles my brain why the frick are they rejecting this?
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:47 pm to c on z
quote:
“What they are doing is (asking), ‘Do we have enough information that it seems reasonably feasible to move to the next phase?’” Burst said.
Translation: we need another study
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:48 pm to TigerRob20
Wonder which member of the "Louisiana Transportation Authority" owns all the land on the route of the other loop plan?
This post was edited on 10/20/15 at 4:53 pm
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:51 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
What they are doing is (asking), ‘Do we have enough information that it seems reasonably feasible to move to the next phase?’” Burst said. Translation: we need another study
side-translation: I was not given enough cash on the side to approve this
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:55 pm to TigerRob20
I'm telling you guys, BR fricked itself so bad letting small town guys with absolutely no foresight run this town for a long arse time and now we're paying the price.
And now small town assholes from the state want none of their tax dollars helping out the city folk
And now small town assholes from the state want none of their tax dollars helping out the city folk
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:55 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Translation: we need more bribe money
Fixed.
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:57 pm to TigerRob20
quote:
Will Sentell ? @WillSentell
Daniel says inner loop no address key issue: traffic entering Baton Rouge on I-10 Bridge.
doesn't sound like complete doom and gloom. sounds like they're looking to improve the one-lane split first. that seems like the right approach--improve the split, then think about the loop.
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:59 pm to TigerRob20
lol.... f'n politicians man.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News