- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: One shot, on life support during Charlotte protest - 1 cop injured
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:33 pm to PapaPogey
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:33 pm to PapaPogey
N.C. recently (July) passed a bill that limits public access to police video.
If they don't release it voluntarily, it will take a court order by potential litigants to view police body cam and dashboard video.
It would be prudent to release the video ASAP if Scott was in possession of a fire arm and he did have it out at the time he was shot.
If they don't release the video, then one has to wonder.
If they don't release it voluntarily, it will take a court order by potential litigants to view police body cam and dashboard video.
It would be prudent to release the video ASAP if Scott was in possession of a fire arm and he did have it out at the time he was shot.
If they don't release the video, then one has to wonder.
4
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:34 pm to Ellis Dee
PIX 11 has a live stream on FB
Not a lot going on
Not a lot going on
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:35 pm to EffingTiger
quote:
N.C. recently (July) passed a bill that limits public access to police video.
If they don't release it voluntarily, it will take a court order by potential litigants to view police body cam and dashboard video.
It would be prudent to release the video ASAP if Scott was in possession of a fire arm and he did have it out at the time he was shot.
If they don't release the video, then one has to wonder.
The Governor just said on CNN that law comes into effect October 1st.
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:36 pm to EffingTiger
Still blows my mind that the mayor still hasn't seen the video yet. She just had a pretty embarrassing interview on Fox.
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:36 pm to Burhead
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/28/19 at 10:13 am
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:36 pm to LSUJML
thanks 
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:36 pm to EffingTiger
quote:
N.C. recently (July) passed a bill that limits public access to police video.
If they don't release it voluntarily, it will take a court order by potential litigants to view police body cam and dashboard video.
It would be prudent to release the video ASAP if Scott was in possession of a fire arm and he did have it out at the time he was shot.
If they don't release the video, then one has to wonder.
Oh Lawd, the conspiracy theories from the BLM folks are going to be wild once they find out about that law and when it was passed.
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:36 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
he problem is that the line of questioning starts and ends at "why are blacks being killed by cops?".
And the question itself is rediculous. "Why was (specific person) killed by a police officer" should always be the question. Each case of a police involved shooting is unique. They should all be looked at individually and and not lumped into groups. By putting them into groups it diminishes the details of each situation and and that's an injustice. It's and injustice to the cop that's labeled as another trigger happy cop. It's an injustice the victim being labeled as just anothe thug or Darwin Award winner.
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:36 pm to EffingTiger
quote:
It would be prudent to release the video ASAP if Scott was in possession of a fire arm and he did have it out at the time he was shot.
Or at least a still shot of the video that shows him with the gun
But even with that, it wouldn't matter. Some of the protestors have already said that it wouldn't matter if he had a gun or not
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:39 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Oh Lawd, the conspiracy theories from the BLM folks are going to be wild once they find out about that law and when it was passed.
It doesn't matter. The video was altered to include a gun.
Just like the BRPD placing a gun on Alton Sterling
It is NEVER their fault
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:40 pm to poops_at_parties
The cops vs BLM is like watching UT vs AU.
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:40 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
But even with that, it wouldn't matter. Some of the protestors have already said that it wouldn't matter if he had a gun or not
Of course not. They were out there chinking rocks before the body was even cold
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:41 pm to Titus Pullo
quote:
Reports of protests on I-277, WBTV airing it
Live thread on reddit
eta:
quote:
WBTV: I-277 All traffic stopped.
This post was edited on 9/21/16 at 10:43 pm
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:43 pm to FelicianaTigerfan
quote:
And the question itself is rediculous. "Why was (specific person) killed by a police officer" should always be the question. Each case of a police involved shooting is unique. They should all be looked at individually and and not lumped into groups. By putting them into groups it diminishes the details of each situation and and that's an injustice. It's and injustice to the cop that's labeled as another trigger happy cop. It's an injustice the victim being labeled as just anothe thug or Darwin Award winner.
Read what I said about liberals and how they approach problems.
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:43 pm to Ellis Dee
quote:https://www.wbtv.com/category/258124/wbtv-live-stream2?clienttype=generic
Reports of protests on I-277, WBTV airing it
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:43 pm to Ellis Dee
fox news has them blocking traffic on interstate
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:44 pm to SPEEDY
Upgrayedd-
Agree, and they are probably already aware of the new regulations to access police video. IMO, given the climate that was not the best plan of action. It does invite suspicion, especially if one is looking for a reason to be suspicious.
Agree also that it probably wouldn't matter to some of the BLM crowd if the video or a snapshot of its contents showed Scott brandishing a firearm.
Agree, and they are probably already aware of the new regulations to access police video. IMO, given the climate that was not the best plan of action. It does invite suspicion, especially if one is looking for a reason to be suspicious.
Agree also that it probably wouldn't matter to some of the BLM crowd if the video or a snapshot of its contents showed Scott brandishing a firearm.
This post was edited on 9/21/16 at 11:03 pm
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:44 pm to upgrayedd
Wasn't disagreeing or arguing. Just piggy backing off of what you said
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:47 pm to FelicianaTigerfan
Run their rears over
Posted on 9/21/16 at 10:48 pm to beebefootballfan
Hannity thinks these fools that are clowning around in their cars are "being high jacked". This guy is completely clueless.
ETA: his guest finally corrected him
ETA: his guest finally corrected him
This post was edited on 9/21/16 at 10:51 pm
Page 10 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News