- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NYTimes Op Ed - I will not project colonial, capitalist or patriarchial concepts on my dog
Posted on 12/26/23 at 6:06 am
Posted on 12/26/23 at 6:06 am
I will not project colonial, capitalist or patriarchial concepts on my dog
LINK
My Year of Being Very Online About Dogs
“Dog training has become just one more target for the woke community to prey upon!”
If you own a dog and have ever searched the internet for advice on that dog, there’s a good chance you’ve encountered Zak George.
Mr. George, a 45-year-old with 3.69 million YouTube followers and the slightly goofy, hyper energy of a doodle mix, is the most popular dog trainer on the platform. He’s the most popular by a long shot: Cesar Millan, the dog whisperer, has 2.71 million. Those trying to deride Mr. George — and there are many — will often say he stopped being a dog trainer a long time ago; what he is now is a dog influencer.
Then, around this time last year, I watched, transfixed, as Mr. George began launching broadsides against an approach to training dogs known as balanced training (more on just what that is in a moment). In video after video, he declared that the dog training industry had reached a crisis point and that it was time for a reckoning with those in the profession who train with what are called aversives — tools that cause a dog discomfort.
The videos did what they were intended to do: They sparked a response. But not just any response. Comment sections filled with discussions on “woke idiots” in dog training. “Radicals Are Hijacking Dog Training,” posted one trainer, calling force-free training, the anti-aversive movement of which Mr. George is arguably the most prominent face, an “ideology” and a “cult” with a “radicalized agenda” — language that sounded awfully familiar.
Even before this, I’d seen the occasional Instagram post by a trainer using terminology that seemed drawn from another context: I’d paused on several posts that applied the term “consent” to dogs — as in, we should get their consent before we pet them. In some cases, the trainer’s vocabulary seemed drawn from even more distant shores: “I will not project colonial, capitalist, or patriarchal concepts on my dog,” one post read, in between tips on leash reactivity and separation anxiety; “don’t gaslight your dog,” another urged.
LINK
My Year of Being Very Online About Dogs
“Dog training has become just one more target for the woke community to prey upon!”
If you own a dog and have ever searched the internet for advice on that dog, there’s a good chance you’ve encountered Zak George.
Mr. George, a 45-year-old with 3.69 million YouTube followers and the slightly goofy, hyper energy of a doodle mix, is the most popular dog trainer on the platform. He’s the most popular by a long shot: Cesar Millan, the dog whisperer, has 2.71 million. Those trying to deride Mr. George — and there are many — will often say he stopped being a dog trainer a long time ago; what he is now is a dog influencer.
Then, around this time last year, I watched, transfixed, as Mr. George began launching broadsides against an approach to training dogs known as balanced training (more on just what that is in a moment). In video after video, he declared that the dog training industry had reached a crisis point and that it was time for a reckoning with those in the profession who train with what are called aversives — tools that cause a dog discomfort.
The videos did what they were intended to do: They sparked a response. But not just any response. Comment sections filled with discussions on “woke idiots” in dog training. “Radicals Are Hijacking Dog Training,” posted one trainer, calling force-free training, the anti-aversive movement of which Mr. George is arguably the most prominent face, an “ideology” and a “cult” with a “radicalized agenda” — language that sounded awfully familiar.
Even before this, I’d seen the occasional Instagram post by a trainer using terminology that seemed drawn from another context: I’d paused on several posts that applied the term “consent” to dogs — as in, we should get their consent before we pet them. In some cases, the trainer’s vocabulary seemed drawn from even more distant shores: “I will not project colonial, capitalist, or patriarchal concepts on my dog,” one post read, in between tips on leash reactivity and separation anxiety; “don’t gaslight your dog,” another urged.
Posted on 12/26/23 at 6:09 am to Eurocat
White liberal women are the worst
Posted on 12/26/23 at 6:21 am to Eurocat
This post ain't wrong. I'm looking for resources to train my 1 year old lab with and anytime I come across something that sounds logical there are 75 posts trying to make me feel like fricking Vlad the Impailer for daring to think about using it on poor sweet Roux.
Posted on 12/26/23 at 6:22 am to LoneStar23
quote:
White liberal women are the worst
Affluent White Female Liberals
AWFLs
This post was edited on 12/26/23 at 6:58 am
Posted on 12/26/23 at 6:23 am to Eurocat
Is it racist to make my African-Canadian (aka black Labrador) retriever fetch ducks or ride in a kennel?
Posted on 12/26/23 at 6:26 am to Eurocat
Does this mean I can no longer say “good boy” to my dog?
Posted on 12/26/23 at 6:27 am to Eurocat
Welcome to the world you democrat voters helped to create OP.
Posted on 12/26/23 at 6:31 am to Eurocat
My dog is just set in his ways
Posted on 12/26/23 at 6:38 am to WeeWee
quote:
it racist to make my African-Canadian (aka black Labrador) retriever fetch ducks or ride in a kennel?
My pearls can’t be clutched any tighter.
Dear god. Get a yellow or silver.
No chocolates either.
Posted on 12/26/23 at 6:38 am to Eurocat
The consequences of training your dog the wrong way:
Posted on 12/26/23 at 6:40 am to Eurocat
Hook a shock collar up to all those kooks and let them ride the lightening every time something idiotic comes out their mouths.
This post was edited on 12/26/23 at 6:47 am
Posted on 12/26/23 at 6:48 am to TigerFanatic99
quote:
This post ain't wrong. I'm looking for resources to train my 1 year old lab with and anytime I come across something that sounds logical there are 75 posts trying to make me feel like fricking Vlad the Impailer for daring to think about using it on poor sweet Roux
Now do horses. Spoiler; breeding animals for their look’s instead of their head and then using training methods with the primary focus being self esteem, is how people get killed.
Posted on 12/26/23 at 6:54 am to LSU alum wannabe
quote:
it racist to make my African-Canadian (aka black Labrador) retriever fetch ducks or ride in a kennel? My pearls can’t be clutched any tighter. Dear god. Get a yellow or silver. No chocolates either.
I have a white lab too but she thinks that she is above retrieving ducks. She thinks that she is a princess. So my old black lab has to fetch all the ducks. Is that bad?
Posted on 12/26/23 at 6:55 am to Eurocat
Liberalism is a mental disorder
Posted on 12/26/23 at 7:03 am to Eurocat
I don’t currently have a dog, but when next I get one, and I will, he will exist for my benefit.
Posted on 12/26/23 at 7:04 am to TheFlyingTiger
quote:
Affluent White Female Liberals
The most spoiled, privileged people on the planet.
Posted on 12/26/23 at 7:06 am to LoneStar23
quote:Yeah they suck pretty bad but Black women are the worst
White liberal women are the worst
Latoya
Lori Lightfoot
Kamala
Shelia Jackson Lee
Leticia James
Hot take- allowing women to vote was an enormous mistake. They're entirely too emotional and irrational. They're one issue voters who vote with their heart, not mind.
Posted on 12/26/23 at 7:07 am to LoneStar23
quote:
White liberal women are the worst
The only definition I have read that accurately describes these people, and I apologize in advance, is cancer.
a practice or phenomenon perceived to be evil or destructive and hard to contain or eradicate.
I firmly believe that many, not all, of these types of people are out to cause as much destruction as they can under a completely bs guise because they are unhappy with themselves and with society as a whole.
Posted on 12/26/23 at 7:08 am to jizzle6609
quote:
because they are unhappy with themselves and with society as a whole.
They feel guilty about being wealthy from inheritance or husband, so they cling to their wealth while trying to disparage anyone else who does the same.
Self made people dont feel guilt, they feel pride.
This post was edited on 12/26/23 at 7:10 am
Posted on 12/26/23 at 7:09 am to Solo Cam
quote:
Yeah they suck pretty bad but Black women are the worst
The people you list below, I agree are not great people, that being said they were fed their information and dont express many if any thoughts that would count as their own.
There are much worse people out there that know how to play chess. The list below arent those people.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News