- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nice try, NASA
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:42 pm to SlimTigerSlap
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:42 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
NASA shifted towards manning the ISS and decommissioned the Saturn project.
The first space station was actually skylab. They modified the 3rd stage of the saturn v for this. From there the goal absolutely was a permanently manned space station. Colossal budget slashes from Reagan onward is how we got the international space station, instead of space station freedom
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:44 pm to TigerstuckinMS
quote:
If the earth is flat how thick it is?
u ever drive a rod and hit refusal? thats mother earth's back walls
This post was edited on 7/15/22 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:48 pm to geauxjuice
quote:
u ever drive a rod and hit refusal? thats mother earth's back walls
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:51 pm to geauxjuice
quote:
u ever drive a rod and hit refusal? thats mother earth's back walls
I didn't know what that is, so i looked it up. According to Wiki, "A rod or pile has been "driven to refusal" when five more blows of an adequate hammer will not budge the rod or pile."
You sure your hammer was adequate?
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:57 pm to GeauxOCDP
quote:
Now since you ignored my reply
Still waiting on a reply from one of them about what is absorbing all those light waves as well...
Posted on 7/15/22 at 4:11 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
Still waiting on a reply from one of them about what is absorbing all those light waves as well...
I went a different route and decided to pretend their flashlight effect was real. I can't get anyone to answer how areas nowhere near the light are as warm and sunny as some of those in it.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 4:15 pm to SlimTigerSlap
Bad thermometers. They need to be recalibrated for flat earth mode.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 4:22 pm to Liberator
quote:
Which specific people? When?
And did they (or anyone) survey the Antarctica?
Truth:
No one other than Gummint / VIP officials are allowed Antarctica access since 1958. (Strictly enforced.)
I guess the 2 weeks I spent climbing Vinson Massif to tick off one of the Seven Summits was just a dream.
PS it was well after 1958.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 4:32 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
I guess the 2 weeks I spent climbing Vinson Massif to tick off one of the Seven Summits was just a dream.
PS it was well after 1958.
That doesn't count. It's not interior enough.
Haven't you seen how he plays this game?
Posted on 7/15/22 at 4:48 pm to TigerstuckinMS
quote:
That doesn't count. It's not interior enough.
Haven't you seen how he plays this game?
That is the entire problem with FE. The FE model keeps getting more and more complex. The RE model is elegant. When you have a new "what about this" the RE model explains it exactly and all the calculations match. Rarely does some hypothetical or observation come up that the RE model doesn't already predict and explain. Those types of "anomalies" have been going on with modern FE since inception and each new one requires the FE autists to go into hiding and come up with an ever more complex model to explain each of the new anomalies.
There is a certain type of person that has a need to feel like they know something that most of the rest of humanity does not know. It feeds a hole in them because they just can't accept that they aren't really that special. The majority of us have just learned to accept though we may be unique the vast majority of us are not extraordinary.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 4:53 pm to TigerstuckinMS
quote:
If the earth is flat how thick it is?
No clue. If the earth is a spinning ball, how thick has the mantle, outer core, and inner core been proven to be?
Posted on 7/15/22 at 5:17 pm to Liberator
quote:
ALL OF IT.
Fake fake fake. Nothing is going anywhere. Hollywood studio stuff. Power of suggestion.
TC, bruh...
But why?
I've asked you this question numerous times now, and you've never actually given an answer.
What does anyone benefit from faking the earth being round instead of flat? NASA (ooohhhh bad demonic guys!) could've easily "faked' everything in the opposite way if it were simply a cash grab.
Your theory makes no sense and you come off as insane, since the earth was proven to be a sphere hundreds of years ago. You think those guys like Galileo were in on the conspiracy too? What did THEY have to gain?
What is anyone gaining by pretending the earth is a sphere instead of flat? Give me ONE logical reason.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 5:28 pm to pankReb
Ah, yes. Big Globe is at the center of it all!
Posted on 7/15/22 at 5:28 pm to pankReb
They could easily get that same money if the truth were the other way around and earth was truly flat. That's a dumb reason.
Did Galileo get rich too? Was he, and the other astronomers and scientists that date as far back as ancient Greece and beyond, have a reason to lie?
Did Galileo get rich too? Was he, and the other astronomers and scientists that date as far back as ancient Greece and beyond, have a reason to lie?
This post was edited on 7/15/22 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 7/15/22 at 5:31 pm to RazorBroncs
What do the elites, the black nobility, ultimately want? It's something like open direct authority and complete untouchability over the entire world enslaved and worshiping them, and achieving immortality. Making themselves God literally. So this is one of many many many lies that serves that end, it's a nice psychological breakdown of the masses from the youngest age
This post was edited on 7/15/22 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 7/15/22 at 5:32 pm to RedHawk
quote:I believe the $10 billion covers the entire development as well as 10 years of operations into the future, the whole shebang.
Is that really what the new telescope cost? Where is the outrage. That is ridiculous.
And that is a drop in the bucket, averaging out to less than $500 million per year in the budget. A sliver of a percent.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 5:33 pm to RazorBroncs
quote:
They could easily get that same money if the truth were the other way around and earth was truly flat. That's a dumb reason.
correct in that they RECEIVE the same amount of money either way.
They get to KEEP more of the money by pretending to send satellites into "orbit".
Posted on 7/15/22 at 5:35 pm to Liberator
Again, how do you explain seeing the sun and the moon in the same day sky at the same time. That model can’t work
Popular
Back to top


0










