- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nice try, NASA
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:02 pm to Liberator
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:02 pm to Liberator
quote:
And funny -- nobody seems to mind, do they? This is why NASA can spend a gazillion dollars and still get pats on the back and "atta boy!"
I'm old enough to remember Obama essentially shutting down NASA but yeah they were totally able to drop $10 billion just to upgrade their instagram timeline.
3
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:04 pm to 62Tigerfan
quote:
NO human has been beyond low earth orbit since December 1972. I’ve heard the rationale for why that it is, but it’s still strange to me.
Strange indeed. Normal reaction.
But then you're not supposed to notice any of that -- or risk being accused of being a CT or Kook! lol...
You're also not supposed to notice the fact that NASA admitted they "lost 700 cartons" of data, documents and 'Moon travel/Landing telemetry. Or, It's 50 years later, but, "WE CAN'T GO BEYOND LOW EARTH ORBIT."
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:05 pm to pankReb
quote:
I'm old enough to remember Obama essentially shutting down NASA but yeah they were totally able to drop $10 billion just to upgrade their instagram timeline.
This was an Obama win, funny enough. Instead of increasing NASA's budget, the gov't would instead provide grants to private companies. Are you not impressed with SpaceX and Blue Origin?
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:06 pm to pankReb
quote:
$10 billion just to upgrade their instagram timeline.
Is that really what the new telescope cost? Where is the outrage. That is ridiculous.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:09 pm to pankReb
quote:
I'm old enough to remember Obama essentially shutting down NASA but yeah they were totally able to drop $10 billion just to upgrade their instagram timeline.
It's been seriously in the works since the early to mid 90s, and lol @ your hyperbole.
Look, I'm not all that impressed with the images either. Don't really know anyone who is. But to just make shite up to fit a narrative is communist bullshite.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:10 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
This was an Obama win, funny enough. Instead of increasing NASA's budget, the gov't would instead provide grants to private companies. Are you not impressed with SpaceX and Blue Origin?
Oh it absolutely was. A lot of people got really rich. Obama got $100 million for selling tens of books. Elon's buying Twitter(pending). Blue Origin got a big hand-me-down boat collecting rust in a P'cola port. And NASA was able to get internet likes for the first time since piano cat.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:11 pm to RedHawk
quote:
Is that really what the new telescope cost? Where is the outrage. That is ridiculous.
yup. And I'm not sure that covered the cost of the launch...
Plans ramped up in 1996
quote:
its 1996 report explored the concept of a larger and much colder, infrared-sensitive telescope that could reach back in cosmic time to the birth of the first galaxies.
....which is the same year as the Princess Diana and Prince Charles divorce.
Diana died the following year. She knew something.
This post was edited on 7/15/22 at 3:15 pm
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:11 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
Because no one gave a $hit after Apollo 12. 13 got some coverage cause it almost ended in disaster. NASA shifted towards manning the ISS and decommissioned the Saturn project.
Nice spin.
Yes, people STILL cared. People were told, "MARS IS NEXT!!" (President after President.) All BS of course.
NASA shifted to the Shuttle (nothing but big ol airplane going nowhere) and ISS (couldn't be proven to even exist in reality) because they were ALL HAT and absolutely NO cattle.
6 Apollo Missions. ONE supposed "Moon" photo. ZERO video or film. One supposed photo of Ball Earth" and that sufficed for the pods.
The NASA Charade and smoke & mirrors had to continue. Cuz...$$$$$. Same with your Hubble and Webb theatic getting you panting.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:13 pm to Liberator
Wait, the ISS is fake too? Ok, I'm out. Take care of yourself Liberator.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:13 pm to pankReb
quote:
A lot of people got really rich... And NASA was able to get internet likes for the first time since piano cat.
Haaa!
I'd give you ten thumbs up if I could.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:15 pm to SlimTigerSlap
ALL OF IT.
Fake fake fake. Nothing is going anywhere. Hollywood studio stuff. Power of suggestion.
TC, bruh...
Fake fake fake. Nothing is going anywhere. Hollywood studio stuff. Power of suggestion.
TC, bruh...
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:15 pm to pankReb
quote:
they staged the moon landing.
One of you people.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:15 pm to Liberator
quote:
ISS (couldn't be proven to even exist in reality)
But you can go outside and see it.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:16 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
quote:
they staged the moon landing.
One of you people.
what? It wasn't one of my people that did it. But it is pretty common knowledge.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:17 pm to TigerstuckinMS
quote:
But you can go outside and see it.
*insert air quotes*
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:27 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:
It's very easy to demonstrate 24-hour sunlight within the Arctic and Antarctic circles both digitally and physically.
It's easy to demonstrate that it is 'possible' in a ball earth model. I believe what was said, by Liberator, is that the phenomenon has never been proven to actually occur in Antarctica while it has been proven in the Artic. There is uncut, time-lapse video of this in the Artic. There is absolutely no such, uncut, video proof in Antarctica.
Why is that?
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:29 pm to Gaggle
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/16/22 at 8:40 am
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:32 pm to PineyWoodsHog
If the earth is flat how thick it is?
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:41 pm to geauxjuice
I could imagine.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 3:42 pm to Liberator
quote:
"WE CAN'T GO BEYOND LOW EARTH ORBIT."
Now since you ignored my reply about it costing $150 billion to go to the moon, with a $21 million budget... why don't you be honest and post the rest of the quote where it says exactly that. Or I guess that part wouldn't be on the conspiracy site you got that quote from. You're not doing research, you're just reading whatever confirms your bias.
Page 13 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News