- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Next Starship launch
Posted on 12/10/23 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 12/10/23 at 4:50 pm
It seems the bureaucrats have to hike their leg on the next flight first. Must make them feel important.
https://www.space.com/spacex-starship-refueling-test-flight
quote:
And a Starship refueling test has been in the offing for a while now. In October 2020, NASA awarded SpaceX $53 million to conduct such a trial in Earth orbit. The contract calls for SpaceX to transfer 11 tons (10 metric tons) of liquid oxygen between tanks inside a Starship vehicle. (Starship's Raptor engines run on supercold liquid oxygen and liquid methane.)
quote:
NASA has a keen interest in the development of Starship, SpaceX's next-generation deep-space transportation system. The agency selected Starship to be the first crewed lunar lander for its Artemis program, which aims to establish a permanent, sustainable human presence on and around the moon by the end of the 2020s.
quote:
It's unclear when Starship's third flight will occur. The vehicle should be ready soon, SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk has said, but technical hurdles aren't the only ones the company must overcome. SpaceX still must secure a launch license from the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, which is overseeing an investigation into what happened during last month's launch.
https://www.space.com/spacex-starship-refueling-test-flight
Posted on 12/10/23 at 5:14 pm to Auburn1968
I want to see the space station from 2001 built.



Posted on 12/10/23 at 5:23 pm to Auburn1968
The blue bloods of the space industry are doing everything they can to slow down SpaceX, especially after NASA said SLS was unsustainable.
Posted on 12/10/23 at 5:26 pm to Auburn1968
quote:As long as Mickey Thomas isn't the lead singer, I'm OK with it
Next Starship launch
Posted on 12/10/23 at 5:30 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
which aims to establish a permanent, sustainable human presence on and around the moon by the end of the 2020s.


They're not hitting that goal.
Posted on 12/10/23 at 6:36 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
It seems the bureaucrats have to hike their leg on the next flight first. Must make them feel important.
I don't understand what youre bitching about? is it this part?
quote:
SpaceX still must secure a launch license from the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, which is overseeing an investigation into what happened during last month's launch.
you don't think there should be any regulation at all when it comes to launching shite into orbit?
We should all be able to launch rockets from in our backyards as we please? even this guy if he buys a house in America?

Posted on 12/10/23 at 8:03 pm to Corinthians420
As we saw following the 1st Starship launch... the FAA & SpaceX work together on the "mishap investigation"
The report that will be released will essentially be SpaceX's report on what caused the failures with FAA saying "yeah we agree on the proposed fixes"
Since the ground infrastructure survived the 2nd launch mostly intact... I would imagine February or March for next flight
The report that will be released will essentially be SpaceX's report on what caused the failures with FAA saying "yeah we agree on the proposed fixes"
Since the ground infrastructure survived the 2nd launch mostly intact... I would imagine February or March for next flight
Posted on 12/10/23 at 8:09 pm to Auburn1968
transferring 10 metric tons for a trial? Did not the crazy Russian show that can be done in the movie about oil well drillers blowing up an asteroid on its way to destroy earth? His special skill was beating on the pipes with a 24 inch pipe wrench
Posted on 12/10/23 at 8:41 pm to Locoguan0
quote:
The blue bloods of the space industry are doing everything they can to slow down SpaceX, especially after NASA said SLS was unsustainable.
Are you even following this?
If they wanted SpaceX to fade they just needed to do nothing. It’s funding from the “blue bloods” that kept SpsceX alive and allowed for development of starship
Posted on 12/10/23 at 8:42 pm to Tom288
quote:
They're not hitting that goal.
I have to reluctantly agree with you.
All of the timelines are ridiculous as it stands.
It’ll be interesting in any case and I wish them all the luck because I really want to see a Starship successfully landing on the moon and returning to a perfect chopstick landing.
Posted on 12/10/23 at 8:42 pm to Tom288
quote:
They're not hitting that goal.
They’re not hitting that goal ever. It’s not possible.
Posted on 12/10/23 at 8:59 pm to Tom288
quote:
They're not hitting that goal.
Ehhhhh
Maybe. Gateway is intended to be operational far short of that deadline.
Posted on 12/10/23 at 9:06 pm to Tom288
quote:
They're not hitting that goal.
It still amazes me what NASA did in the 60’s. Going from never having anything in space to landing on the Moon in one decade was incredible. My dad was a NASA engineer during that time.
Posted on 12/10/23 at 9:41 pm to Auburn1968
IFT-3 will happen by March.
We will see the cadence pick up more and more as they get better and better at meeting flight objectives.
But Starship ain’t carrying people from the launch tower for at least 5-7 years. Artemis III might not happen for another 4-5. Gonna need dozens and dozens of cargo/Starlink flights first.
We will see the cadence pick up more and more as they get better and better at meeting flight objectives.
But Starship ain’t carrying people from the launch tower for at least 5-7 years. Artemis III might not happen for another 4-5. Gonna need dozens and dozens of cargo/Starlink flights first.
Posted on 12/10/23 at 9:42 pm to Auburn1968
Ahh my favorite NAZI, a great man
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:32 am to rt3
for what it's worth... it looks like SpaceX is prepping to roll something out tonight
there are notices out for "road delays" around the Starbase facility until 2 AM
maybe Booster 10 gets rolled out to the orbital launch mount
maybe Starship S28 gets rolled out to the suborbital launch pad to go through its testing... cryo-proofing, spin prime, & static fire
there are notices out for "road delays" around the Starbase facility until 2 AM
maybe Booster 10 gets rolled out to the orbital launch mount
maybe Starship S28 gets rolled out to the suborbital launch pad to go through its testing... cryo-proofing, spin prime, & static fire
This post was edited on 12/11/23 at 12:33 am
Posted on 12/11/23 at 5:45 am to Breesus
quote:
They’re not hitting that goal ever. It’s not possible
Care to share your reasoning or just standing pat that you know better than people who do more complex calculations in one day than you've done in your entire life?
Posted on 12/11/23 at 6:53 am to Kafka
quote:”Is everything OK?”
As long as Mickey Thomas isn't the lead singer, I'm OK with it
Posted on 12/11/23 at 10:23 am to Volvagia
quote:
they wanted SpaceX to fade they just needed to do nothing. It’s funding from the “blue bloods” that kept SpsceX alive and allowed for development of starship
Well that's just made up.
Back to top
