- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:06 pm to member12
quote:
Weird seeing a brand new Tundra with the cab off for a major repair. Very Ford-esq.
Could you imagine if every time a Ford, Ram, Nissan or Chevy truck had a major issue it got a thread?
Chicken would have to start a truck problems board and it would be the busiest board on the site. The manufacturers make so many trucks a year. Some are going to have issues. Difference now is the cottage industry of truck reviews online and Youtubers that amplify the hell out of an issue.
Based on all the new Tundra reviews online, is it the most scrutinized truck release ever?
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:09 pm to bbarras85
quote:
I put 150,000 miles on my first ecoboost and traded it in with no issues. They will last as long as they are taken care of just like anything else.
This is so dumb. 80% of people will have no problems with their ecoboost. That doesn’t mean it’s a good engine. People take care of their eco's and still have problems with them.
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:12 pm to nugget
quote:
This is so dumb. 80% of people will have no problems with their ecoboost.
What's dumb is throwing out some arbitrary number like 20% of Ecoboost owners will have problems regardless of how they maintain the vehicle. That's not close to true.
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:12 pm to PoppaD
quote:
Based on all the new Tundra reviews online, is it the most scrutinized truck release ever?
Tundra baws still make up a very small percentage of truck owners, so I doubt it. I’d say the 6.0, 6.7, and ecoboost have all been more scrutinized in their time.
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:13 pm to PoppaD
quote:
Could you imagine if every time a Ford, Ram, Nissan or Chevy truck had a major issue it got a thread?
That absolutely happens, almost always from the Tundra fanbois.
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:13 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
What's dumb is throwing out some arbitrary number like 20% of Ecoboost owners will have problems regardless of how they maintain the vehicle. That's not close to true.
I’m sorry you just bought what the salesman told you to buy, and didn’t know you were getting a pile of junk
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:13 pm to nugget
quote:
I’m sorry you just bought what the salesman told you to buy, and didn’t know you were getting a pile of junk
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:14 pm to nugget
Thanks, EPA.
The 5.7 was a gas hog by modern standards, a title basically every engine gets at some point in its life cycle.
The 5.7 was a gas hog by modern standards, a title basically every engine gets at some point in its life cycle.
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:15 pm to nugget
quote:
Tundra baws still make up a very small percentage of truck owners, so I doubt it. I’d say the 6.0, 6.7, and ecoboost have all been more scrutinized in their time.
I'm sure your right. I'm a Toyota Baw and the internet knows it. My google feed and ads are full of Tundra reviews from different sites and Youtubers.
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:16 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
The 5.7 would seem like nothing special if every competitor put 4.10 gearing standard.
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:27 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
The 5.7 would seem like nothing special if every competitor put 4.10 gearing standard.
The longevity and reliability is what makes the tundra popular. Same reason a lot of people are ordering a 5.0 and waiting 4 months to get it in so they’re not stuck driving an ecoboost
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:31 pm to nugget
quote:
The longevity and reliability is what makes the tundra popular.
The domestic trucks last a very long time as well
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:35 pm to nugget
quote:
The longevity and reliability is what makes the tundra popular.
True
quote:
Same reason a lot of people are ordering a 5.0
Mine had the 5.0. Other than a leak the first week I owned it, very good engine.
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:37 pm to EA6B
quote:
A lot of military, and aircraft electronics have "tactile" controls, you can tell what the contol is set to, and change settings just by "feel", electronics in vehicles should be the same.
Maybe for millionaires that can afford such things. F-35 pilot's helmet is $400,000 alone.
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:40 pm to terriblegreen
quote:
Let me know when you want to sell it!
I've actually had cash offers on the spot for it - it looks brand new.
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:41 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Tundra sells so poorly relative to the competition.
It’s because people like you, who really don’t have a clue what they’re buying, or even the concept of turbos, transmissions, etc.
“This 2.7 ecoboost gets 23 mpg!? Well I’m sold” “I like the grill on the new Chevy trucks, I’m going to buy one!”
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:42 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Mine had the 5.0. Other than a leak the first week I owned it, very good engine.
Love it with the 10 speed, would be happy to own one
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:43 pm to nugget
quote:
It’s because people like you, who really don’t have a clue what they’re buying, or even the concept of turbos, transmissions, etc.
“This 2.7 ecoboost gets 23 mpg!? Well I’m sold” “I like the grill on the new Chevy trucks, I’m going to buy one!”
I don't own a 2.7 F150 or a new Chevy. Sorry you have to push lies to feel good about buying a subpar truck that does nothing better than the competition.
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:47 pm to LNCHBOX
You got really offended when I laughed at the piece of shite ecoboost. Sorry, you seemed like you’d buy the smallest one possible.
Plus, that post is about why people buy vehicles. You think people are looking at displacement or features?
Plus, that post is about why people buy vehicles. You think people are looking at displacement or features?
Popular
Back to top


1




