Started By
Message

New Ghostbusters Movie - They are ignoring the female version

Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:16 pm
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18158 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:16 pm
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
35500 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

Dan Aykroyd, Ernie Hudson, and Bill Murray — will return to reprise their roles.
Posted by lsuwontonwrap
Member since Aug 2012
34147 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:17 pm to
Well let's hope it doesn't suck.
Posted by Furious_George
Member since Jan 2019
34 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:19 pm to
Bad planning on that last movie. Males don't want to watch it because it's an all female cast. Females aren't interested in movies that incorporate tools and hunting things down.
This post was edited on 1/16/19 at 7:20 pm
Posted by GoldenBoy
Winning!
Member since Nov 2004
42011 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:19 pm to
Shouldn't we all ignore the female version?
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
113970 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

Like it did not even happen.


Good. You can't just remake a movie, replace all the characters with women and expect it to be a hit because the original movies were successful.

Sometimes all you need to see are the previews to tell they are trying too hard and the all girl cast Ghostbusters is a great example of this.
Posted by Tygerfan
Member since Jan 2004
33745 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

They are ignoring the female version



So am I.
Posted by GreyBear
Member since Nov 2017
664 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:21 pm to
IMO, the recent female crap version does NOT exist.
Posted by CajunTiger92
Member since Dec 2007
2821 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:23 pm to
Couldn’t Harold Ramis play a ghost?
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124314 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

Males don't want to watch it because it's an all female cast. Females aren't interested in movies that incorporate tools and hunting things down.


Or because it sucked, was terribly written, unfunny, poorly cast, and an insult to the original films.
This post was edited on 1/16/19 at 7:30 pm
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:39 pm to
Posted by tketaco
Sunnyside, Houston
Member since Jan 2010
19537 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:46 pm to
Lulz!
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171037 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:47 pm to
2001 me is super pumped.
Posted by liz18lsu
Naples, FL
Member since Feb 2009
17303 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:55 pm to
Is it bad, as a female, I generally hate female comedians, DJ’s, but really love women that are pretty and intelligent?
Posted by fillmoregandt
OTM
Member since Nov 2009
14368 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:55 pm to
Or be told that if you don’t like the all-female version, that it’s because your a college razor bigot
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119234 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:56 pm to
I think everyone ignore the female version.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134865 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

Well let's hope it doesn't suck.



Spoiler alert. It will
Posted by SundayFunday
Member since Sep 2011
9302 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:57 pm to


Finally some honest courage in film making
Posted by OldSouth
Folsom, LA
Member since Oct 2011
10941 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

Reitman is looking to cast two male and two female teenagers for the film.


Posted by JawjaTigah
Bizarro World
Member since Sep 2003
22501 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

Like it did not even happen.
whut happen’d?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram