Started By
Message

re: NASA says New Orleans workforce a reason for issues with Boeing's Artemis rocket program

Posted on 8/9/24 at 5:05 pm to
Posted by Swagga
504
Member since Dec 2009
17419 posts
Posted on 8/9/24 at 5:05 pm to
This isn’t unique to boeing to be honest either. Nobody wants to work in manufacturing and places are dying for skilled labor.
Posted by 94LSU
Member since May 2023
636 posts
Posted on 8/9/24 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

They have to want to live in New Orleans which many smart people do not.

Michoud is pretty far from N.O. proper.
Posted by meeple
Carcassonne
Member since May 2011
10231 posts
Posted on 8/9/24 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

They have to want to live in New Orleans which many smart people do not.

They had plenty of these skilled people already there and happy to stay before they scrapped the Space Shuttle program
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
28265 posts
Posted on 8/9/24 at 5:20 pm to
NASA/Boeing won't be in New Orleans five years from now based on this report. They are going to shutter the NO East facility down and relocate it to somewhere on the Tombigbee River.
Posted by danilo
Member since Nov 2008
23345 posts
Posted on 8/9/24 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

NASA/Boeing won't be in New Orleans five years from now based on this report. They are going to shutter the NO East facility down and relocate it to somewhere on the Tombigbee River.

Sad but true
Posted by Crawdaddy
Slidell. The jewel of Louisiana
Member since Sep 2006
18836 posts
Posted on 8/9/24 at 6:39 pm to
My dad retired from there years ago. Spent his career there and saw the progression of hires and bs that came along in his later years.

After a few months ears grew f retirement he decided to pick up a job at Textron just to be doing something. Nothing fancy and in fact retry basic kind of job. Easy enough. Small paycheck. Something to do. Figured he would enjoy it.
Nope. Said the young local workforce was a disaster and an embarrassment to work along side of. He quit after a few months and got busy with a small business of his own.
Posted by LordSaintly
Member since Dec 2005
40601 posts
Posted on 8/9/24 at 6:42 pm to
What are they saying or doing wrong in that video?
Posted by HighlyFavoredTiger
TexLaArk
Member since Jun 2018
915 posts
Posted on 8/9/24 at 6:45 pm to
New Orleans workforce sounds like code words
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
39199 posts
Posted on 8/9/24 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

They had plenty of these skilled people already there and happy to stay before they scrapped the Space Shuttle program


I started an earlier thread and said the same. For 50 years that facility built rockets and fuel tanks with no issue.

Additionally, Lockheed is building Orion capsules at Michaud and has no problems.

This isn’t NOLA. This is Boeing hiring shite labor and not training them. Just like every other Boeing plant.
This post was edited on 8/9/24 at 6:57 pm
Posted by MyRockstarComplex
The airport
Member since Nov 2009
4389 posts
Posted on 8/9/24 at 6:59 pm to
You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to know that New Orleans East sucks.
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
34387 posts
Posted on 8/9/24 at 7:01 pm to
Well, most of MAF is Bama now so...
Posted by Swagga
504
Member since Dec 2009
17419 posts
Posted on 8/9/24 at 7:31 pm to
quote:

This isn’t NOLA. This is Boeing hiring shite labor and not training them. Just like every other Boeing plant.



I’m going to sound like a broken record but this is a problem across heavy manufacturing facilities in general. A lot of their products were built by guys using tribal knowledge. When they left the force the young guys were thrown into the fire with no training, no plans, and drawings are way behind. Now these facilities are scrambling to train a workforce that isn’t all that adept in welding, fitting, electrical, etc.

And to the posters who think Mobile is a better option, ask Austal about the massive lawsuit they just came out of because they were using a grinder that was injuring people with little to no training on how to use the machine.
This post was edited on 8/9/24 at 7:36 pm
Posted by armsdealer
Member since Feb 2016
11974 posts
Posted on 8/9/24 at 7:58 pm to
They don't want to pay competitive wages for the industry, they choose these places to pay lower wages. LA and MS is full of these type of deals, they certainly didn't choose them for the quality of candidate, they chose them for the cheap labor force.
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
12386 posts
Posted on 8/9/24 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

You're fricking NASA, you can recruit literally world wide.


Smart people generally don't want to relocate to a shite hole like New Orleans. They have better options elsewhere.

The few decent candidates that are local to New Orleans are generally looking to move their families out to places with a better quality of life.

Basically, can't keep em here, can't bring em in.

Posted by OvertheDwayneBowe
Member since Sep 2016
3289 posts
Posted on 8/9/24 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

lower employee compensation relative to other aerospace competitors.”


Posted by frequent flyer
USA
Member since Jul 2021
3322 posts
Posted on 8/9/24 at 8:37 pm to
What about all the other Boeing problems?

Do they make the Starliner and the 737 Max there too?
Posted by Mr Breeze
The Lunatic Fringe
Member since Dec 2010
6504 posts
Posted on 8/9/24 at 11:25 pm to
quote:

The report found that Boeing’s quality management system at Michoud does not adhere to these standards or NASA requirements. NASA states a lack of quality control has led to 71 issues on the project that range from minor to potentially serious.

Complex manufacturing demands a QMS, sounds like a Boeing engineering mgmt or more likely executive level mgmt issue. And NASA has been sitting on their hands during years of busted cost control?

At the worker bee level, hire for attitude and train for skill.

Yes, I'm aware of the candidates locale. Nonetheless, it can be done.

Done a few projects with Boeing, non recent, they were a great company to collaborate with until the finance types took over the C suite.

Boeing better return to being engineering focused before it's too late.
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
19054 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 12:22 am to
quote:

Smeg


You are correct.

With respect to the Artemis program and its problems, it's hard to know where to begin.

First, NASA should've awarded the contract for the core stage to LM, not Boeing. LM already had the expertise, organizational structure, etc in place at MAF.

Boeing's plan was to take mgmt from their ISS program who had experience working with NASA and join them with engineers from their Delta program who had experience with rockets. In reality, neither of those happened. Most of its mgmt came from their commercial planes who treated it like it was an airplane.

Boeing has very inefficient MES, NCR, and dwg change processes that eat their lunch every single day. See above.

See Sneg's post above. He is correct. The NOLA crime and culcha are legitimate factors. Aerospace is a very active industry at present. Any talented engineer or tech has options. Few will choose to set down roots around MAF.

Boeing was DEI before DEI was cool. IMO, they will die on the DEI hill rather than offend. Or to put it another way, this is not your Saturn V's MAF. Wonder what's changed?

Finally, the overall Artemis Core Stage design is viable. Boeing's approach is not.




Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
19054 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 12:25 am to
quote:

At the worker bee level, hire for attitude and train for skill.


I like this but it's a decade late at this point. And the options at MAF are gonna stretch this to its limits.
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
36260 posts
Posted on 8/10/24 at 12:41 am to
So they are saying it is "you people?"
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram