Started By
Message

re: My job barely existed when I was in college, and will cease to exist before I retire

Posted on 5/26/25 at 11:03 am to
Posted by The Squonk
Member since Nov 2023
132 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 11:03 am to
quote:

The AI bubble will burst


Posted by 6R12
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2005
10574 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 11:12 am to
Always was a fan of Kansas.
Posted by Porpus
Covington, LA
Member since Aug 2022
2524 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 11:13 am to
Laugh all you want. What economic value is AI, particularly the "generative AI" that people seem to think is going to make computer software for us, creating? If it's not creating value, when will it, and how?

I get pretty pissed off about this shite. When I graduated high school, people told me not to get a CS degree because all the jobs would go to Indians. I knew Indians and I thought they were idiots so I didn't listen. A few years later is was Eastern Europeans. I knew people from Eastern Europe and they were idiots so I pressed forward.

Now it's AI. I know how generative AI works. It's idiotic. I am not afraid of it.

I'd like to hedge my bets, though. What's the hot AI stock I should put my money into? I'm assuming your money is in AI, right, you man of mirth?
Posted by greenbean
USAF Retired - 31 years
Member since Feb 2019
5744 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 11:20 am to
quote:

There’s a small percentage of Indians who are extremely smart but they’re not an overall high IQ group like Chinese and Japanese are.


I know several Airmen who gone over there to train them to work on aircraft. They all say they are the dumbest race of people on the planet. The ones that are over here are like the top .1% of the population.
Posted by The Squonk
Member since Nov 2023
132 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Laugh all you want. What economic value is AI


Just because you’re mad about it and in denial doesn’t mean it isn’t happening.

Microsoft just laid off a ton of developers and replaced 2/3 of them with AI and the rest with offshore Pajeets.

This is becoming more common among Fortune 100 companies. It may be delayed if you work for a smaller shop because of the upfront cost involved, but it will get your developer role sooner than you’re ready.
Posted by GeauxEdits
Member since Jun 2018
341 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 11:28 am to
At least for the near future you wont lose jobs to AI you'll lose jobs to people who know how to use AI.
Posted by The Squonk
Member since Nov 2023
132 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 11:33 am to
That’s comforting
This post was edited on 5/26/25 at 11:34 am
Posted by FLObserver
Jacksonville
Member since Nov 2005
15230 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 11:34 am to
I agree somewhat because i am in the data analytics field. Where your argument is off is where you think A.I can automatically break down what a customer is asking for from the data or trying to understand the ask itself. That's 70% of the work for me. Thirty percent of the work is coding . That is the easy part for me. Then get back to me when they change the specs again. A.I. maybe ready for the Coding part but it aint ready yet for dealing with people trying to nail down exactly what they are needing in the end. Ever been on the phone with A. I. when you have a complicated question. Tell me how that went?
Posted by The Squonk
Member since Nov 2023
132 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 11:45 am to
My company’s AI efforts are getting very good at insights.
Posted by UnluckyTiger
Member since Sep 2003
39404 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Porpus
when the AI bots take over, they’re coming for you first.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
39917 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 11:52 am to
quote:

Unless some completely new field of employment opens up, we will have no choice except to have some form of UBI.


No. This is the worst idea ever, because with UBI, everything will just get more expensive because everyone just got a X% raise.

Just because we don’t know what jobs will replace these tech jobs doesn’t mean that jobs won’t happen. Time and time again technology has evolved to replace masses of men and women working. Every time we have adapted without UBI
Posted by RazorBroncs
Possesses the largest
Member since Sep 2013
14926 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

Lucky for me I’m a pilot. So I feel pretty safe in saying that no robot or fancy AI could ever do what I do.


Boy do I have some news for you...

It'll be a while before automation is trusted on commercial passenger flights, but that's coming relatively soon. It's pretty much already here on the doorstep with freight carriers.

Being a commercial pilot is one of the few careers that'll be impacted the earliest.
Posted by HeadCall
Member since Feb 2025
2275 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

Being a commercial pilot is one of the few careers that'll be impacted the earliest.


The technology is already there to be honest. But ironically, unions and the FAA being slow as molasses on changing regulations means it may be the last to be impacted.

Also, the freight carriers tend to fly the oldest fleets which means it more difficult to integrate the newer technology into their airplanes.
This post was edited on 5/26/25 at 12:12 pm
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
70540 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

I do worry about my kids and what things will look like for them in the future. They are both girls. I can't exactly tell them to go be a lineman


Yes you can. One of the better data center techs I work with is a girl. She's a little butch but she's smart and skilled, great communicator, and gets the job done.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
70540 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

I am serious. And don’t call me Shirley.


What's your vector victor?
Posted by SpotCheckBilly
Member since May 2020
7613 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 12:19 pm to
We are implementing AI into our products where I work, and also using it in our daily jobs. It can be useful, and holds the promise of becoming more useful, but in my experience, it's kind of like hunting -- it works a lot better if you are hunting over a baited field, and someone has to bait that field.

While I think it can be a useful tool, I am more concerned that it will become the best propaganda tool ever. People assume the results they are getting are objective, but it depends on who baited that field and the data set it has to work with.

In our company, the general feeling is that we can get 5 Indians for the price of one American. The bean counters are always pushing for the Indians, The people who have to manage the process and support the results, are begging for Americans. Now, some Indians are great, particularly the ones who are already here and who were educated here. But like any other group, not all are and there is a lot of lying on resumes going on. At one point, we bought an eastern European company. They say the ratio there is 3 to 1 Americans, and we get much better results with them, plus the time difference is less of a problem. We had tried South American resources. The time difference is not a problem, but there is a different work ethic.
Posted by UptownJoeBrown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2024
2675 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

They all say they are the dumbest race of people on the planet. The ones that are over here are like the top .1% of the population.


Well they have a caste system. If you were born to a father who shoveled shite for a living, guess what you ended up doing?
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
46176 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 12:29 pm to
delete
This post was edited on 5/26/25 at 3:10 pm
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
58499 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

You’re 100% correct that indians are the worst employees.


Even the competent ones, which still don't match up to a typical American worker, are impossible to deal with because of the time difference. You need someone managing them almost full time. Maybe that works for some companies, but I find it hard to believe they're really getting value when they add in all of the related costs.
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
34157 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 12:43 pm to
It's funny how everyone was expecting robots to take over fast food and blue collar jobs, even rooting for the day, only for computers to instead be better suited to take the jobs of white collar workers.

Seems karmic in a way.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram