Started By
Message

re: My Brother In Law caught his 16 y/o daughter parking with her boyfriend

Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:36 am to
Posted by roguetiger15
Member since Jan 2013
17685 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:36 am to
Was your sister a slut too?
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
26364 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:37 am to
More likely that it’ll make the daughter mad at her dad and she’ll go mess around with even more guys, just not in her parents’ driveway
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:40 am to
There's even a name for it. "Daddy issues"
This post was edited on 1/7/18 at 10:41 am
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122548 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:43 am to
A friend of mine, who is now married to his HS sweetheart. When he took her on her first date, when he went pick her up, her dad told him "follow me". He brought him into his shop, had his guns laid out as if he had been cleaning them and told my friend "I know how teenage boys think. You better have her home at midnight and if you do anything to her, I will not be scared to use one of them" and looked at his guns.

Her dad was a complete dick to my friend for years and they have never been on good terms. While it might be funny to frick with teenage boys, be careful how you go about it, you could do more harm, long term, than anything.
Posted by Tigahs24Seven
Charlie Kirk's America
Member since Nov 2007
15191 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Did your BIL just expect her to never date? What kind of sociopath has a talk with a gun with 16 year old just for dropping his daughter off lol. What a pussy





He was driving home from dinner and saw the kid's very obvious type car parked in the back end of an empty parking lot....rolled up on them without getting out and pulled off then called her and told Jr. to bring her home so they could talk.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:44 am to
That's illegal.
Posted by yellowfin
Coastal Bar
Member since May 2006
99045 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:47 am to
The crime is with the threat, combine that with the gun and it becomes more serious.
Posted by tigersownall
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2011
17219 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:47 am to
I was all up in the deep stuff at 16 so I see his concern.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122548 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:47 am to
What's illegal?
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
41902 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:47 am to
the implication was there.

You need more than an implication to meet the standard for assault. It has to be a threat by overt statement or action. By your definition I'd get arrested every day merely talking to people while on the job

As a law enforcement officer of over 2 decades experience, I would never arrest for merely having a holstered gun in his waistband without overt threat. Poor parenting? Yes. Illegal? No.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:47 am to
Making threats with a deadly weapon.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
56232 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:51 am to
La. is an open carry state and there is nothing illegal about having a piston tucked into your belt on your own property.

Now, I don't know what BIL said to the boy but yes, there are problems if what he said amounted to a threat in the legal sense.

"You'd better watch it, son", for example, is not a threat.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
60232 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:52 am to
Too bad ol boy put that fartcan on the s10. Dead giveaway to pops
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
144690 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:53 am to
I went hunting my high school girlfriends dad and brothers.

I was plenty nervous. More so of the brothers. But whole family was as cool as they could be.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
56232 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:53 am to
quote:

the implication was there. You need more than an implication to meet the standard for assault. It has to be a threat by overt statement or action. By your definition I'd get arrested every day merely talking to people while on the job As a law enforcement officer of over 2 decades experience, I would never arrest for merely having a holstered gun in his waistband without overt threat. Poor parenting? Yes. Illegal? No.


FINALLY we get some solid legal analysis here. Thank you!
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:53 am to
Nothing wrong with it as long as he didnt threaten the kid.
Posted by jdeval1
Member since Dec 2009
7525 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:56 am to
Dumb arse. I have 2 daughters but I also realize that almost all 16yr olds do that and he's not going to stop it. Unless the guy was 35 that's ridiculous to threaten the kid with a gun.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
56232 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:56 am to
Implied Threat?

I'm not sure that, in the law, there is any such thing as an "implied threat".

How does one construct an objective standard to establish the crime of "Implied Threat".

What about a new defense for Rape called "Implied Consent"?



Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Nothing wrong with it as long as he didnt threaten the kid


But the OP said it was done intentionally to scare the kid.

What is the legal difference between threatening and scaring?
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 10:58 am to
my favorite part about this story is that she probably has her boyfriends glock in her mouth right now
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 18
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 18Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram