- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mother And Son Charged With Incest
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:43 am to Iron Lion
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:43 am to Iron Lion
quote:
Let me get this straight, the majority of people on here are perfectly fine with mom fricking son as long as they can't reproduce? I've been up all night and my mind is a little foggy but that's what I'm getting from these posts.
Doesn't affect me.
And I'm in an argumentative mood this morning. I don't agree with incest, of course, but using the same logic as other issues, it is hard to keep it illegal.
This post was edited on 9/14/16 at 9:44 am
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:45 am to Iron Lion
quote:Im fine even if they can reproduce
Let me get this straight, the majority of people on here are perfectly fine with mom fricking son as long as they can't reproduce?
We are true small govt people. Not fake arse ones like most of this site, that is for small govt until they aren't
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:45 am to Iron Lion
quote:Define "perfectly ok"
Let me get this straight, the majority of people on here are perfectly fine with mom fricking son as long as they can't reproduce? I've been up all night and my mind is a little foggy but that's what I'm getting from these posts.
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:47 am to lsupride87
Listen I'm all for the government staying out of my home as much as possible. I'm not sure what my argument is here except that it's just icky 
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:47 am to shel311
quote:Exactly. Saying something should be legal, and morally agreeing with it are two different things
Define "perfectly ok"
At least they should be. But these "small govt" republicans in here sure can't seem to differentiate the two
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:48 am to Iron Lion
quote:We all agree it's gross.
argument is here except that it's just icky
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:50 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:You're not making any sense. It boils down to you simply finding one ok and the other not. Your support for the position is poor at best.
TheCaterpillar
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:50 am to Iron Lion
quote:
Let me get this straight, the majority of people on here are perfectly fine with mom fricking son as long as they can't reproduce? I've been up all night and my mind is a little foggy but that's what I'm getting from these posts.
Homosexuality used to be a crime. There used to be science to justify it. On top of that, there was (and still is) the taboo surrounding it. Now, we have a different mentality towards it, especially since lots of the scientific conclusions were found to be irrelevant or just plain untrue. You can say the view from "back in the day" is outdated and not necessarily supported by science.
Now take incest. it is a crime. The scientific justification is "you would have a bunch of retard babies". It also has a taboo associated with it. But, really, the science doesn't support that you would have a "bunch of retard or deformed babies". The studies don't necessarily show that. Now that the scientific justification doesn't hold up, you are really left with the taboo.
Whether you like it or not, there are similarities.
This post was edited on 9/14/16 at 9:52 am
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:54 am to SabiDojo
quote:And even if you assume the science is correct, are you then in favor of making, say, alcohol illegal? Look at what alcohol does to people and families, completely destroys I'm assuming millions every year. If you're against incest for that reason, logically speaking, how can you NOT be against alcohol?
Now take incest. it is a crime. The scientific justification is "you would have a bunch of retard babies". It also has a taboo associated with it. But, really, the science doesn't support that you would have a "bunch of retard or deformed babies". The studies don't necessarily show that. Now that the scientific justification doesn't hold up, you are really left with the taboo
It comes down the moral thing, like you said. And our government should not be governing morality, in any way, shape, or form.
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:55 am to The Torch
quote:
Damn Son - I'd smash the hair off of that
Apparently her son had the same thought as you
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:57 am to shel311
I completely agree that the government should not govern morality. But is morality really what we are basing our opinions on when it comes to incest? It feels like it's bigger than just being immoral.
Posted on 9/14/16 at 10:00 am to Iron Lion
quote:Explain
It feels like it's bigger than just being immoral.
Posted on 9/14/16 at 10:02 am to AlxTgr
quote:
You're not making any sense. It boils down to you simply finding one ok and the other not. Your support for the position is poor at best.
My point is that gay marriage being legal will not lead to incest being socially acceptable and that the two aren't related (pun intended).
That's it, really.
People who connect the two are bitter that gays can get married.
ETA:
I'm actually very pro-small government, but the relationship of a nurturer/parent/authority figure over a child can remove the consent of said child for the relationship. That is a parent taking advantage of their child.
If siblings want to frick, I guess that is different. Wholly gross, but different.
This post was edited on 9/14/16 at 10:08 am
Posted on 9/14/16 at 10:04 am to lsupride87
would you have sex with your mom? or cousin, even? be honest
Posted on 9/14/16 at 10:05 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:Why?
My point is that gay marriage being legal will not lead to incest being socially acceptable and that the two aren't related (pun intended).
quote:You can't support this.
People who connect the two are bitter gays can get married.
Posted on 9/14/16 at 10:05 am to Iron Lion
quote:Like what, exactly?
I completely agree that the government should not govern morality. But is morality really what we are basing our opinions on when it comes to incest? It feels like it's bigger than just being immoral.
I mean yea, it's completely freaking deplorable, obviously. I'm just of the thought that if something has no adverse affects on me or others(victimless "crime"), it should not be against the law. Can that be applicable in a perfect world, I don't know, maybe not. Or I guess it is in a perfect world, but maybe in the real world, but you get the point.
This post was edited on 9/14/16 at 10:06 am
Posted on 9/14/16 at 10:06 am to Lester Earl
quote:Absolutely not
would you have sex with your mom? or cousin, even? be honest
Explain what that has to do with anything? I wouldn't frick John from the office either. That's legal.
Posted on 9/14/16 at 10:06 am to lsupride87
I'm not really sure about an explanation. I'm a husband and a father. My wife and I have 2 sons. The thought of a parent having sex with their child is reprehensible in my opinion. It doesn't matter if the child is at the age of consent or not. To me that goes beyond the bounds of just being immoral.
Posted on 9/14/16 at 10:07 am to Lester Earl
quote:Cousin, how far remov...I mean, no gross!!!
would you have sex with your mom? or cousin, even? be honest
I don't smoke pot, but also think it should be legal.
Posted on 9/14/16 at 10:07 am to Iron Lion
quote:What you are describing is morality
I'm a husband and a father. My wife and I have 2 sons. The thought of a parent having sex with their child is reprehensible in my opinion. It doesn't matter if the child is at the age of consent or not. To me that goes beyond the bounds of just being immoral.
Popular
Back to top



0





