- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mother And Son Charged With Incest
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:10 am to fr33manator
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:10 am to fr33manator
Yeah the risks are only high after many generations of inbreeding. The chances of every offspring wanting to bang and marry every sibling or parent are very low.
Also, line breeding, which is the mating of the closely related, is done to ensure strong genetic profiles when done correctly.
Also, line breeding, which is the mating of the closely related, is done to ensure strong genetic profiles when done correctly.
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:11 am to fr33manator
quote:
If marriage is about reproduction, then gay people would have no leg to stand on.
It is certainly not about reproduction, but PREVENTING incestual reproduction is an argument that cannot be applied to homosexuals who cannot have kids.
quote:
this is the can of worms that gets opened when you destroy the definition of something and muddle it into gobbledygook.
They didn't destroy the definition of it and the only people trying to
"open a can of worms" are ironically the people who were anti-gay marriage.
Gays don't want incest to be legal. They find it as reprehensible as most normal people.
quote:
I'm not in favor of incest
Ehhhhh
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:16 am to TheCaterpillar
What's the argument here? Incest is illegal as it should be. Homosexuality is legal as it should be. These are two totally different things. As you said homosexuals can't have kids. Incestuous relationships produce fricked up retarded kids.
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:18 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:
It is certainly not about reproduction, but PREVENTING incestual reproduction is an argument that cannot be applied to homosexuals who cannot have kids.
So you are in favor of preventing older women from having children as well?
Should we kill all the retarded or deformed babies then?
If it's about "love" after all.
quote:
They didn't destroy the definition of it
Oh really?
Should a father and son be able to get married then? If the love each other? No risk of reproduction there either.
Let's see how far your hypocrisy extends
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:19 am to TheCaterpillar
Hahahahaha...y'all think THAT is fricked up...try THIS on for size. Heard it on the radio yesterday and gagged...
What in the actual frick?!?!
quote:
DUNCAN, Okla. — A woman and her daughter are facing incest charges after authorities learned the pair were legally married in Oklahoma this year, and that the mother had married her son a few years earlier.
What in the actual frick?!?!
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:20 am to PairofDucks
Damn Son - I'd smash the hair off of that
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:20 am to Iron Lion
quote:
What's the argument here?
Right wing nuts think because gay people can get court documents saying they're married in the eyes of the law that society is about to start accepting moms fricking their grown kids.
Also heard that this will lead to wide spread pedophilia acceptance as well.
Basically, despite the gays being just as anti-incest and anti-pedophilia as everyone else, them getting married is about to lead to the downfall of society.
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:22 am to fr33manator
quote:
Should a father and son be able to get married then?
No because that is incest.
How are you not getting this? Its not a slippery slope. Its a very defined line.
Unrelated, consenting adults can be married. End.
quote:
Should we kill all the retarded or deformed babies then?
Ok, you've got issues man. I'm out of here. Go on with your gay bash.
This post was edited on 9/14/16 at 9:23 am
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:23 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:So when someone is tested and they carry a gene that can carry birth defects, with higher percentage chances than incest does, those people shouldn't be allowed to have sex
One results in no babies, the other results in special needs incest babies.
Got it
This post was edited on 9/14/16 at 9:24 am
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:24 am to lsupride87
Its clearly not the only reason, its one of 2 that I stated.
And the other is more fricked up.
ETA:
And again, for the last time, if you can't tell the difference between gay marriage and incest, and understand they are in no way related, I don't know how to help you.
Gay people themselves hate incest more than you guys.
And the other is more fricked up.
ETA:
And again, for the last time, if you can't tell the difference between gay marriage and incest, and understand they are in no way related, I don't know how to help you.
Gay people themselves hate incest more than you guys.
This post was edited on 9/14/16 at 9:28 am
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:29 am to TheCaterpillar
I didn't say shite about gay marriage
I am responding to people that incest should be illegal because of the possibility of afflicted babies
There are people that carry genes that give them a high probability of having babies with genetic disorders
According to some on this board, those people should not be allowed to have sex
I am responding to people that incest should be illegal because of the possibility of afflicted babies
There are people that carry genes that give them a high probability of having babies with genetic disorders
According to some on this board, those people should not be allowed to have sex
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:31 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:Whether we find something reprehensible or not shouldn't be the barometer for whether it should be legal or not.
Gays don't want incest to be legal. They find it as reprehensible as most normal people.
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:31 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:
Gay people themselves hate incest more than you guys
How do we even know this?
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:31 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:
One results in no babies, the other results in special needs incest babies.
Not necessarily. Maybe they take precautions to not have children. What if she is unable to bear children or he uses protection.
If every sex act pops out a kid, I think the world would be much more populated.
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:33 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:You keep saying this, did they do some kind of study between gays and straights asking them to rate their incest hate on a scale of 1-10 or something?
Gay people themselves hate incest more than you guys
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:34 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:
You are defending incest. Think about that.
I'm defended human rights. I imagine a while back a white person and a black person engaging in sex was on the same level as incest.
What did these two people in the OP do that affects you?
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:36 am to i am dan
quote:Bingo!
What did these two people in the OP do that affects you?
If it doesn't affect me, I don't care in the least. That doesn't mean I'll want to associate and be best friends with a mom/son couple, but it's not up to me or the government IMO to tell them what they can or can't do with things that don't affect my life.
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:39 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:
No, a majority find one to be perfectly fine.
I'm guessing they are okay with it politically, but I think deep down most people would find a man shoving his dick in another man's shitty hairy a-hole to be a little off putting.
They are okay maybe with the concept cuz they want to be PC, but I'm not so sure with the real act.
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:41 am to shel311
Let me get this straight, the majority of people on here are perfectly fine with mom fricking son as long as they can't reproduce? I've been up all night and my mind is a little foggy but that's what I'm getting from these posts.
Popular
Back to top



1







