- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: MLB Warns Giants Pitchers Who Wore Bible Verses on Caps During ‘Pride Night’
Posted on 6/17/26 at 11:52 am to BowDownToLSU
Posted on 6/17/26 at 11:52 am to BowDownToLSU
Just play sports. I watch them to detach from life’s non sense such as this (either side), not to dive into it.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 12:12 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
well.......if a bible verse is objectively immoral, it should be easy to explain why. right?
Are you a “slavery is inherently and objectively immoral” guy or an “it was the times” guy?
Posted on 6/17/26 at 12:23 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Are you a “slavery is inherently and objectively immoral” guy or an “it was the times” guy?
I’ll answer after you define “objectively.” Otherwise we’re just throwing the word around. :-)

This post was edited on 6/17/26 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 6/17/26 at 12:26 pm to BowDownToLSU
It's called protesting...
Seems that I remember when a certain Pro- sport said that it was ok to use their platform to protest.
Petridge Farms remembers
Seems that I remember when a certain Pro- sport said that it was ok to use their platform to protest.
Petridge Farms remembers
Posted on 6/17/26 at 12:30 pm to Klark Kent
Standard definition.
Is slavery moral or immoral?
Is slavery moral or immoral?
Posted on 6/17/26 at 12:33 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Slavery is immoral. Now we’re back to my question: what makes slavery objectively immoral instead of simply immoral by today’s cultural standards?
Posted on 6/17/26 at 12:42 pm to BowDownToLSU
Simply no way I'd play that night....sorry coach, stomach virus and shitting ever 10 minutes.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 12:51 pm to BowDownToLSU
I don’t watch MLB during June. They are so all-in on pandering to sexual preferences of weirdos.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 2:00 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
what makes slavery objectively immoral
I’ll admit that when I read this my first instinct was to chuckle, but I really gave it some thought and eventually felt like I was trying to describe a color without using the name of the color
But it’s a good question. Ultimately I think it’s objectively immoral in biblical times for all the same reasons it was objectively immoral before the civil war and is objectively immoral now. The loss of human rights and dignity, being treated as property, forced servitude; being used as a sex slave like Hagar (or that little Indian boy from JP Morgan) or having rules for how long/hard one can be beaten before it becomes a crime.
The fact that the people of that time period were less aware and less evolved is more of an explanation than an exoneration.
I get your point. The Bible is a historical series of texts more than anything, and that was without question the cultural norm at the time. It was basically never rebuked or condemned from what I can remember, and I think that’s hard for some folks to stomach given that the institution doesn’t really jive with the “main character” and his teachings.
If we view everything through the lens of what was acceptable in the time period, then it’s hard to label anything as wrong unless explicitly stated in the text at the time, right? That feels like it’s probably not the best way to approach things, either.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 2:40 pm to BowDownToLSU
quote:
The San Francisco Giants are proud to support Pride Night and the LGBTQ+ community
Gay, but the entity can do what it wants. Free country.
quote:
Baseball should be a place where everyone feels welcome, respected, and valued.
I sure hope so. Including the people who don't agree with your messaging, lest they feel unwelcomed.
quote:
We understand that the choices by individual players have caused pain and anger to many in the LGBTQ+ community and we are sorry for that. Those choices do not change our organization’s commitment to inclusion, belonging, and creating a welcoming environment for all. We remain grateful to our fans, partners, employees, players
Ah. So it was a lie.
If the league will fine players for not wearing approved uniforms, ok fine UNLESS you are forcing them to violate their religion through your required messaging.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 2:51 pm to NawlinsTiger9
I appreciate the thoughtful response. I think we’ve moved into a genuine philosophical question. (And I’m certainly not qualified to answer it)
We agree slavery is immoral. I’m just asking what makes that objectively true instead of simply today’s cultural consensus.
To me, that circles back to my original question: before we can say certain Bible verses are objectively offensive or “didn’t age well,” we have to know what objective moral standard we’re using to judge them.
I just really struggle with people today judging generations before us as if they had the same cultural knowledge, legal norms, and moral framework we do now. I’m not saying historical context just excuses away everything. I’m saying it matters.
We agree slavery is immoral. I’m just asking what makes that objectively true instead of simply today’s cultural consensus.
To me, that circles back to my original question: before we can say certain Bible verses are objectively offensive or “didn’t age well,” we have to know what objective moral standard we’re using to judge them.
I just really struggle with people today judging generations before us as if they had the same cultural knowledge, legal norms, and moral framework we do now. I’m not saying historical context just excuses away everything. I’m saying it matters.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 2:52 pm to Mushroom1968
quote:Coach Moock used to shout “what is this, a circle jerk” when we would gather in the OF during BP. Another Moockism: “All you guys ever talk about is pussy. One day you’ll come to know the joy of a nice long shite”.
remember my baseball coaches in HS making us do this, so I’m not surprised
Posted on 6/17/26 at 2:59 pm to Zapps4Life
quote:
Looks like their religious beliefs were violated for being forced to participate in Pride night. That one would hurt in court…
No it couldn't. The SF Giants are not a state actor, there is no chance at a suit based on the 1A here
Posted on 6/17/26 at 3:08 pm to BowDownToLSU
Its kinda funny that all of this is having an opposite effect than what they thought.
I'm sure those with the Giants that made the decision to have these hats made thought this would show love and support to the gays. Now it has just magnified how much these baseball players do not support the gays.
Imagine if they hadn't said a word about these players writing Bible verses on their hats. No one would know about actual MLB players stance on this pride month shite. or better yet, not have the damn hats made.
I'm sure those with the Giants that made the decision to have these hats made thought this would show love and support to the gays. Now it has just magnified how much these baseball players do not support the gays.
Imagine if they hadn't said a word about these players writing Bible verses on their hats. No one would know about actual MLB players stance on this pride month shite. or better yet, not have the damn hats made.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 3:20 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Are you a “slavery is inherently and objectively immoral” guy or an “it was the times” guy?
You sound like an only the US did it or only white people did it guy.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 3:27 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
I think we’ve moved into a genuine philosophical question.
I had the same thought when I was working through my reply.
quote:
(And I’m certainly not qualified to answer it)
Nor am I
Good stuff. I appreciate it.
I’ll say this and then I’ll stop yapping: I also have a hard time looking back in the past and litigating every word someone says an indictment of their character. That’s not what I’m doing here, at least not intentionally. I try to separate the act or the quote or the verbiage from the person.
Hell there’s stuff I said on this board 10 years ago that I wouldn’t say now, and we are talking about things that happened centuries and millenniums apart.
In regards to the Bible, I think there’s some not so great stuff in there, but I’d never advocate that the people of the time were bad or inherently evil just because they engaged in things that are viscerally unacceptable to me and my 2026 brain.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 3:42 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Good stuff. I appreciate it.
I think we're probably closer than we are apart. I appreciate you taking the time to think it through instead of just firing back another meme.
eta: at the same time, I know I’ve earned the stigma of being a drive-by shitposter who pops in, fires off a take, and doubles down on what others shitposting say. It’s not that I’m incapable of supporting my viewpoint; it’s usually a combination of limited time with two young kids, job, etc, etc. Plus knowing certain posters aren’t worth the effort. You’re not one of those. And, if I’m being honest, sometimes I just like to shitpost. lol.
Anyhow. I still think the question of *what standard we're using to judge Scripture* is the interesting part, but I'm also comfortable admitting I am not qualified to answer that question.
quote:
I’d never advocate that the people of the time were bad or inherently evil just because they engaged in things that are viscerally unacceptable to me and my 2026 brain.
completely agree.
This post was edited on 6/17/26 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 6/17/26 at 4:38 pm to BowDownToLSU
The gay lettering on the Giants uniform isn’t part of any official uniform, but is an addition to promote the LGBT agenda. I don’t see why players putting on an addition to promote Christianity is any different.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 4:58 pm to thejuiceisloose
quote:
No it couldn't. The SF Giants are not a state actor, there is no chance at a suit based on the 1A here
It wouldn't be a First Amendment claim; it would be a claim for discrimination under the Civil Rights Act. If they're fined based on their religious beliefs, they could argue they are being discriminated against based on their religious beliefs.
Popular
Back to top

0









