- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Millennials aren’t having enough babies to keep up with generation before them
Posted on 11/20/17 at 9:53 pm to Azkiger
Posted on 11/20/17 at 9:53 pm to Azkiger
quote:good. we were onto something in the 1920s.
now we're getting into selective breeding
quote:america isn't even close to over population.
The effects of over-population are quite catastrophic.
This post was edited on 11/20/17 at 9:56 pm
Posted on 11/20/17 at 9:54 pm to tiggerthetooth
quote:
What are you talking about? They already DID do this?
Perhaps I should have said the results of the experiment are coming in soon and it wont be pretty?
Posted on 11/20/17 at 9:54 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
i mean is this a bad thing?
breeding to overpopulate the world shouldnt be a contest
breeding to overpopulate the world shouldnt be a contest
Posted on 11/20/17 at 9:57 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
It's very obvious what the problem is in this country, but you aren't allowed to talk about it. You aren't allowed to notice it. You just have to take it on the chin. A burden, you might say.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 9:58 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Perhaps I should have said the results of the experiment are coming in soon and it wont be pretty?
There were a lot of baby girls thrown out, but some Chinese instead of throwing out their baby girls hid them from the government. As a result, a lot of Chinese females popped up on the government radar through marriage. The Chinese ended up with a lot of unmarried men, and are putting them into military service...naturally thats what you would do with so many men. Its whats given their military a bit of clout over the last decade.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 9:59 pm to TDcline
quote:
The cost of living has increased so dramatically that starting a family has to be a carefully planned situation.
Gone are the days of the Dad being able to work a standard 9-5 and have a stay at home wife.
That was gone years ago. I'd say by the 1980's that was over. However, we have created a new standard of living.
Houses in the 1960's -70s averaged around 1800 sq. feet. Nowadays, the average is probably 2500 sq. ft. That costs more money. monthly bills then were what? power, water, home phone, gas bill? now we have cable , cell phone with data, water, gas etc. That cost is through the roof.
Cars today are 10-20x cost as 1970's. But they have waay more features, etc.
Further, today few compaines have pensions for their employees ( except lazy government workers), so now you have to take out a % for a 401k.
Bottomline just a lot more overhead nowadays that requires 2 income household .
Posted on 11/20/17 at 9:59 pm to Deactived
quote:yes, it is a bad thing. a major change in demographics/birth rate is almost always bad. populations need to increase.
i mean is this a bad thing?
japan's fertility crisis
Posted on 11/20/17 at 10:00 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
america isn't even close to over population.
With population growing exponentially, yea we really are. We've tripled our pop in the last 100 years. That'll probably 4x or 5x the next 100 years. That could be around 1.5 Billion people in America in 100 years.
You don't wait until your waist high in shite before you start taking corrective measures.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 10:00 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
China will about to undergo this experiment. Its not going to be pretty.
China has been relaxing their restrictions on the number of children people are allowed to have. Economic development has naturally lead to fewer children without the laws.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 10:00 pm to East Coast Band
quote:
That was gone years ago. I'd say by the 1980's that was over. However, we have created a new standard of living.
Houses in the 1960's -70s averaged around 1800 sq. feet. Nowadays, the average is probably 2500 sq. ft. That costs more money. monthly bills then were what? power, water, home phone, gas bill? now we have cable , cell phone with data, water, gas etc. That cost is through the roof.
Cars today are 10-20x cost as 1970's. But they have waay more features, etc.
Further, today few compaines have pensions for their employees ( except lazy government workers), so now you have to take out a % for a 401k.
Bottomline just a lot more overhead nowadays that requires 2 income household .
I agree. It's good that the government subsidizes some households so that we can keep the birthrate above replacement rate :)
Posted on 11/20/17 at 10:02 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
yes, it is a bad thing. a major change in demographics/birth rate is almost always bad. populations need to increase.
japan's fertility crisis
While those are serious issues, its not even on par with mass starvation/disease/war over resources/etc.
You cannot just keep growing our populations indefinitely unless we can start moving to other planets.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 10:04 pm to el Gaucho
quote:
I agree. It's good that the government subsidizes some households so that we can keep the birthrate above replacement rate :)
The issue is they're subsidizing some of the worst households.
We don't need more people, we need more law abiding tax payers.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 10:04 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
Can't afford to have kids when the cost of everything is rising and your employer doesn't want to pay worth a damn.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 10:04 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
a major change in demographics/birth rate is almost always bad.
except that we are increasing at an alarming rate
the solution is never lets outbreed the previous generation
Posted on 11/20/17 at 10:06 pm to Deactived
quote:
except that we are increasing at an alarming rate
the solution is never lets outbreed the previous generation
We are not at replacement level. Its not a slowing of increasing breeding, its a backwards movement.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 10:08 pm to Deactived
quote:what is increasing
except that we are increasing at an alarming rate
quote:we don't need to outbreed them, we need to replace deaths with births
the solution is never lets outbreed the previous generation
This post was edited on 11/20/17 at 10:08 pm
Posted on 11/20/17 at 10:11 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
what is increasing
Global pop.
quote:
we don't need to outbreed them, we need to replace deaths with births
Agreed, our birth rates need to be higher and other groups birth rates need to be lower.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 10:13 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
this is why America will look like Europe in 20 years.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 10:13 pm to Spankum
The generation before millennials is Generation X.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 10:16 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
what is increasing
it means the numbers are rising
at the rate we are going, the rest of the world will be very dependent on U.S. agriculture. that means more factory farming and more usage of our land. meanwhile, our population is getting larger and land is at a premium
quote:
we don't need to outbreed them, we need to replace deaths with births
for what? a slow down of breeding wont hurt. what do we need more bodies for?
Popular
Back to top



1





