- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Microsoft says these are the 40 jobs with the lowest risk of being taken over by AI
Posted on 8/25/25 at 2:27 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
Posted on 8/25/25 at 2:27 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
If it made you less efficient, no you wouldn’t
Yes. Yes we would.
When those that insure us or regulate say "do it". Efficiency matters not.
This post was edited on 8/25/25 at 2:29 pm
1
Posted on 8/25/25 at 2:28 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Truly amazing just how stupid you will make yourself look just to try to disagree with me. Such weird behavior
Even more amazing.
The hoops, twists and turns a narcissist goes through to attempt to be right.
Your assertion was still wrong.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 2:29 pm to UtahCajun
quote:
Yes. Yes we would.
When those that insure us or regulate say "do it". Efficiency matters not.
You’d just continue to use human labor as it’s already insured and regulated moron
Posted on 8/25/25 at 2:31 pm to honeybadger697
I thought a lot of engineering is being sent to the jeets?
Posted on 8/25/25 at 2:39 pm to UtahCajun
I mean to each his own but I personally disagree. AI has changed the game. You are 100% correct with “simple robotics” that only do a series of pre programmed motions but with AI allowing for more complex assessments it dramatically widens applications. And the current iteration of AI is still new enough we haven’t seen the results of attempts to pair it to robotics. There will definitely be a slow culture shift because for more complex stuff like making determinations of corrosion and material integrity will still want to be reviewed by a human, but the robot can definitely do the scans and write the reports now. Especially on the “deep dive” levels of AI that you typically have to pay for to get access to but it really churns for 5-10 minutes at the data centers to evaluate every consideration.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 2:43 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
If it made you less efficient, no you wouldn’t
There are boatloads of things I’ve sacrificed in terms of efficiency to maintain compliance with regulation and safety. And knowingly did it to make our situation easier to explain to auditors. WTF are you talking about?
Posted on 8/25/25 at 3:05 pm to Volvagia
quote:
There are boatloads of things I’ve sacrificed in terms of efficiency to maintain compliance with regulation and safety. And knowingly did it to make our situation easier to explain to auditors. WTF are you talking about?
Sigh, this retard said they’d still invest in robotics which he then said cause compliance and insurance problems even if they were less efficient.
That makes precisely zero sense and I’d absolutely false.
You sacrifice efficiency in order to maintain the status quo in order to REMAIN compliant, which makes perfect sense.
Some of you really need remedial comprehension courses
Posted on 8/25/25 at 3:32 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
You’d just continue to use human labor as it’s already insured and regulated moron
Thank you for finally agreeing with me, that your origianl assertion wad indeed wrong.
Took awhile, but we got you there.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 4:18 pm to stout
quote:
Ticket Agents and Travel Clerks
I thought the internet replaced these already
Posted on 8/25/25 at 4:20 pm to UtahCajun
quote:
Thank you for finally agreeing with me, that your origianl assertion wad indeed wrong.
You are all over the place my guy
Posted on 8/25/25 at 4:21 pm to stout
Well I’m in the Top 40, but I mostly deal with country people in my industry to where I doubt they’d like for it to be automated, and I’ve got several customers in the Bottom 40 that should help me out here.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 4:40 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
You are all over the place my guy
Nope.
Look in the mirror guy.
You said:
quote:
2. The least to be affected by AI is mostly because you don’t need AI to do those, simple robotics will be sufficient
In relation to what was posted in the OP. My industry is one of the least affected. Therefore your claim is that we will not be affected by AI, but simple robotics. I disagreed.
After a bit of back and forth, you then said:
quote:
You’d just continue to use human labor as it’s already insured and regulated moron
^^^this agrees with me in that simple robotics will not replace the contractors I use.
Why did we have to do this? Are you really so narcissitic that you always have to be right, even when you are wrong? Take a loss every now and then. It is good for the soul.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 4:42 pm to Volvagia
quote:
I mean to each his own but I personally disagree. AI has changed the game. You are 100% correct with “simple robotics” that only do a series of pre programmed motions but with AI allowing for more complex assessments it dramatically widens applications. And the current iteration of AI is still new enough we haven’t seen the results of attempts to pair it to robotics. There will definitely be a slow culture shift because for more complex stuff like making determinations of corrosion and material integrity will still want to be reviewed by a human, but the robot can definitely do the scans and write the reports now. Especially on the “deep dive” levels of AI that you typically have to pay for to get access to but it really churns for 5-10 minutes at the data centers to evaluate every consideration.
That's cool. One of us will be wrong. If it is me, I hope all the contractors I use will be retired by then. I like a lot of them and have used them as I have jumped from industry to industry.
Refining, mining and now midstream(midstream is working retirement).
Posted on 8/25/25 at 4:43 pm to UtahCajun
quote:
After a bit of back and forth, you then said:
Because you said you’d still invest in robotics if it made you less efficient
Posted on 8/25/25 at 5:06 pm to stout
I didn’t see actors, but they are definitely going extinct.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 5:58 pm to Volvagia
quote:
Unemployed for 3 years
lol
Yes, I’m sure most people will be productive within those 3 years
Posted on 8/25/25 at 6:12 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
The least to be affected by AI is mostly because you don’t need AI to do those, simple robotics will be sufficient
We already have a shite ton of automation in the oilfield. Automation doesn’t replace a person driving by and noticing that shite ain’t working.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 6:19 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
The funding for the UBI would come from the profits off of AI.....from the AI companies.
The frick it will… they won’t fund it willingly. We have to make them
Posted on 8/25/25 at 6:25 pm to el Gaucho
quote:I
If you can't describe your job in 3 words
Sell
Stuff.
Guess I'm safe! Whew!
Posted on 8/26/25 at 9:13 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
The frick it will… they won’t fund it willingly
They are already discussing funding it willingly. Otherwise the millions of unemployed masses will bring out the pitchforks.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News