- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Math problem, calculation quiz - what's the most cost-efficient solution?
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:20 am
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:20 am
Scenario: Covering sections of framed wall with wallboard sheets that come in 3 sizes = 96"x48" $108, 96x24 $91, 48x32 $40.
Wall sections to be covered:
55x42
55x42
18x42
51x96
How many sheets of each size would be most cost-effective to cover all wall sections?
Wall sections to be covered:
55x42
55x42
18x42
51x96
How many sheets of each size would be most cost-effective to cover all wall sections?
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:21 am to The Mick
Too early in the morning for this shite!!!
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:24 am to The Mick
Can the scrap from the sheets be used to cover other sections or are they waste material once cut?
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:25 am to The Mick
quote:
Help me save money on my next house project because I'm too lazy to do the math myself - what's the most cost-efficient solution?
FIFY
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:26 am to The Mick
2 sheets of 96" x 48"
1 sheet of 96" 24"
1 sheet of 48" x 32"
$347
1 sheet of 96" 24"
1 sheet of 48" x 32"
$347
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:27 am to Ingeniero
quote:Yes. Scraps can be used.
Can the scrap from the sheets be used to cover other sections or are they waste material once cut?
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:27 am to The Mick
quote:
55x42
55x42
18x42
51x96
Are those numbers in feet or inches? Kind of a crutial detail....
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:28 am to The Mick
Go with 96"x48" and hang them vertically on the walls. This allows your finisher to run tape vertically and not primarily horizontally with vertical tape joints along the abutting "bastard" joints. It'll save you both time and money on finishing, and thus on the entire project.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:28 am to Loup
quote:What goes where?
2 sheets of 96" x 48"
1 sheet of 96" 24"
1 sheet of 48" x 32"
$347
This post was edited on 7/16/25 at 8:28 am
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:30 am to Lonnie Utah
quote:Inches, but really doesn't make a difference, relatively speaking.
Are those numbers in feet or inches? Kind of a crutial detail....
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:32 am to The Mick
That total wall area the needs to be covered is 10,272 sq. inches.
Sheet Cost Efficiency
96"x48" ($108) – 4,608 sq. in. = $0.0234 per sq. in.
48"x32" ($40) – 1,536 sq. in. = $0.0260 per sq. in.
96"x24" ($91) – 2,304 sq. in. = $0.0395 per sq. in.
Recommended Combination
2 sheets of 96"x48" ? covers 9,216 sq. in.
1 sheet of 96"x24" ? adds 2,304 sq. in. (total 11,520 sq. in., enough to cover all walls)
0 sheets of 48"x32" (not needed in this mix)
Total Cost:
(2 × $108) + (1 × $91) = $307
Sheet Cost Efficiency
96"x48" ($108) – 4,608 sq. in. = $0.0234 per sq. in.
48"x32" ($40) – 1,536 sq. in. = $0.0260 per sq. in.
96"x24" ($91) – 2,304 sq. in. = $0.0395 per sq. in.
Recommended Combination
2 sheets of 96"x48" ? covers 9,216 sq. in.
1 sheet of 96"x24" ? adds 2,304 sq. in. (total 11,520 sq. in., enough to cover all walls)
0 sheets of 48"x32" (not needed in this mix)
Total Cost:
(2 × $108) + (1 × $91) = $307
This post was edited on 7/16/25 at 8:51 am
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:33 am to The Mick
2ea 96x48 and 1ea 48x32 Total Cost $256
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:34 am to The Mick
4 full-sized sheets. Moving on.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:34 am to The Mick
Do people still not know how to use ChatGPT?
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:37 am to The Mick
quote:
Large is most cost-effective per square inch, followed by small, then medium
Final Answer:
• 2 Large (96x48) sheets
• 1 Small (48x32) sheet
• Total cost: $256
• All sections covered with minimal waste and lowest cost.
-ChatGPT
This post was edited on 7/16/25 at 8:38 am
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:41 am to AncientArousal
quote:
Just ask ChatGPT
I did exactly that. Below is the response, which is formatted kind of strangely, but you can get the drift.
quote:
Thanks! Let's work through the most cost-effective way to cover the four walls, accounting for **waste** and aiming to **minimize total cost**.
---
### ?? Wall Sizes
Total square footage to cover:
1. 55" × 42" = 2,310 in² (x2 walls) ? 4,620 in²
2. 18" × 42" = 756 in²
3. 51" × 96" = 4,896 in²
**Total = 10,272 in²** = **71.33 ft²**
Let's round up slightly and assume **at least 75 ft²** to include some **waste (5%–10%)**.
---
### ?? Board Sizes and Prices
| Size (inches) | Area (in²) | Price | Cost per in² |
| ------------- | ---------- | ----- | ------------ |
| 96" × 148" | 14,208 | \$108 | **\$0.0076** |
| 24" × 96" | 2,304 | \$91 | \$0.0395 |
| 32" × 48" | 1,536 | \$40 | \$0.0260 |
?? **Observation**:
The **96"×148"** board is **by far** the **cheapest per square inch**, even if it's large and potentially harder to work with.
---
### ?? Strategy: Use the Large Board First
We want to use as **few large boards** as possible to minimize cost, and only use the smaller ones when necessary (for smaller or odd pieces).
---
### Step-by-Step Fit Plan
Let’s see if one 96"x148" board (14,208 in²) can cover most of the space:
* Total area needed: 10,272 in²
* One large board = 14,208 in² ? **more than enough** in raw area.
* But now we need to verify **actual fitting**.
---
### ? Try to Fit All Walls from One 96"x148" Sheet
We’ll check if we can lay out the four wall panels **within** one sheet.
#### Wall Cut Plan from 96"x148":
* 2x 55"x42"
* 1x 18"x42"
* 1x 51"x96"
Try stacking horizontally or vertically.
---
#### Option A: Layout on 96" Height (tall side up), 148" width:
\| Width used: |
* 55" + 55" = 110"
* 18" = fits in remaining 38"
? All three smaller walls fit in one row across the top (42" tall), with width 128" used, still under 148".
Then, the big wall (51"x96") goes underneath — 96" height fits, 51" width easily fits under 148".
? **All pieces fit in one 96"x148" board.**
---
### ? Best Option: Buy **1 Large Sheet** (96"x148")
* Cost: **\$108**
* Covers: All four wall areas, with extra leftover
* Cheapest per square inch
* Efficient fit with minimal cutting
---
### ? Optional Waste Buffer
If you're concerned about mistakes or cutting waste:
* Add **1 small extra board**: 32"x48" ? \$40
(adds 1,536 in² = 10.67 ft²)
Still total cost = **\$148**
But if you're confident in the cuts, you can stick with just **1 large sheet**.
---
### ? Final Recommendation:
| Board Type | Quantity | Cost |
| --------------------- | ---------------- | --------------- |
| 96"x148" | 1 | \$108 |
| **Optional:** 32"x48" | 1 (extra buffer) | \$40 |
| **Total** | 1 or 2 boards | **\$108–\$148** |
Let me know if you’d like me to diagram the layout on the board!
Popular
Back to top


21












