Started By
Message

Math problem, calculation quiz - what's the most cost-efficient solution?

Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:20 am
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
44835 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:20 am
Scenario: Covering sections of framed wall with wallboard sheets that come in 3 sizes = 96"x48" $108, 96x24 $91, 48x32 $40.

Wall sections to be covered:
55x42
55x42
18x42
51x96

How many sheets of each size would be most cost-effective to cover all wall sections?




Posted by JDPndahizzy
JDP
Member since Nov 2013
6918 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:21 am to
Too early in the morning for this shite!!!
Posted by ugasickem
Allatoona
Member since Nov 2010
12178 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:23 am to
Math? No thanks.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
25683 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:24 am to
48x32
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
21679 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:24 am to
Can the scrap from the sheets be used to cover other sections or are they waste material once cut?
Posted by SLafourche07
Member since Feb 2008
9998 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:25 am to
quote:

Help me save money on my next house project because I'm too lazy to do the math myself - what's the most cost-efficient solution?



FIFY
Posted by Loup
Ferriday
Member since Apr 2019
15539 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:26 am to
2 sheets of 96" x 48"
1 sheet of 96" 24"
1 sheet of 48" x 32"
$347

Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
44835 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:27 am to
quote:

Can the scrap from the sheets be used to cover other sections or are they waste material once cut?
Yes. Scraps can be used.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
31768 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:27 am to
quote:

55x42
55x42
18x42
51x96


Are those numbers in feet or inches? Kind of a crutial detail....
Posted by Swamp Angel
Somewhere on a river
Member since Jul 2004
9546 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:28 am to
Go with 96"x48" and hang them vertically on the walls. This allows your finisher to run tape vertically and not primarily horizontally with vertical tape joints along the abutting "bastard" joints. It'll save you both time and money on finishing, and thus on the entire project.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
44835 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:28 am to
quote:

2 sheets of 96" x 48"
1 sheet of 96" 24"
1 sheet of 48" x 32"
$347
What goes where?
This post was edited on 7/16/25 at 8:28 am
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
44835 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Are those numbers in feet or inches? Kind of a crutial detail....
Inches, but really doesn't make a difference, relatively speaking.
Posted by HuskyPanda
Philly
Member since Feb 2018
2233 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:32 am to
That total wall area the needs to be covered is 10,272 sq. inches.

Sheet Cost Efficiency
96"x48" ($108) – 4,608 sq. in. = $0.0234 per sq. in.

48"x32" ($40) – 1,536 sq. in. = $0.0260 per sq. in.

96"x24" ($91) – 2,304 sq. in. = $0.0395 per sq. in.

Recommended Combination
2 sheets of 96"x48" ? covers 9,216 sq. in.

1 sheet of 96"x24" ? adds 2,304 sq. in. (total 11,520 sq. in., enough to cover all walls)

0 sheets of 48"x32" (not needed in this mix)

Total Cost:
(2 × $108) + (1 × $91) = $307
This post was edited on 7/16/25 at 8:51 am
Posted by MoisterOyster
On a reef
Member since May 2017
127 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:33 am to
2ea 96x48 and 1ea 48x32 Total Cost $256

Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:34 am to
4 full-sized sheets. Moving on.
Posted by MintBerry Crunch
Member since Nov 2010
5753 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:34 am to
Do people still not know how to use ChatGPT?
Posted by AncientArousal
Member since Jul 2025
78 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:35 am to
Just ask ChatGPT
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
54577 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:36 am to
7
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
37662 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:37 am to
quote:

Large is most cost-effective per square inch, followed by small, then medium

Final Answer:
• 2 Large (96x48) sheets
• 1 Small (48x32) sheet
• Total cost: $256
• All sections covered with minimal waste and lowest cost.




-ChatGPT
This post was edited on 7/16/25 at 8:38 am
Posted by Witty_Username
Member since Jul 2021
669 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Just ask ChatGPT



I did exactly that. Below is the response, which is formatted kind of strangely, but you can get the drift.
quote:

Thanks! Let's work through the most cost-effective way to cover the four walls, accounting for **waste** and aiming to **minimize total cost**.

---

### ?? Wall Sizes

Total square footage to cover:

1. 55" × 42" = 2,310 in² (x2 walls) ? 4,620 in²
2. 18" × 42" = 756 in²
3. 51" × 96" = 4,896 in²

**Total = 10,272 in²** = **71.33 ft²**

Let's round up slightly and assume **at least 75 ft²** to include some **waste (5%–10%)**.

---

### ?? Board Sizes and Prices

| Size (inches) | Area (in²) | Price | Cost per in² |
| ------------- | ---------- | ----- | ------------ |
| 96" × 148" | 14,208 | \$108 | **\$0.0076** |
| 24" × 96" | 2,304 | \$91 | \$0.0395 |
| 32" × 48" | 1,536 | \$40 | \$0.0260 |

?? **Observation**:
The **96"×148"** board is **by far** the **cheapest per square inch**, even if it's large and potentially harder to work with.

---

### ?? Strategy: Use the Large Board First

We want to use as **few large boards** as possible to minimize cost, and only use the smaller ones when necessary (for smaller or odd pieces).

---

### Step-by-Step Fit Plan

Let’s see if one 96"x148" board (14,208 in²) can cover most of the space:

* Total area needed: 10,272 in²
* One large board = 14,208 in² ? **more than enough** in raw area.
* But now we need to verify **actual fitting**.

---

### ? Try to Fit All Walls from One 96"x148" Sheet

We’ll check if we can lay out the four wall panels **within** one sheet.

#### Wall Cut Plan from 96"x148":

* 2x 55"x42"
* 1x 18"x42"
* 1x 51"x96"

Try stacking horizontally or vertically.

---

#### Option A: Layout on 96" Height (tall side up), 148" width:

\| Width used: |

* 55" + 55" = 110"
* 18" = fits in remaining 38"
? All three smaller walls fit in one row across the top (42" tall), with width 128" used, still under 148".

Then, the big wall (51"x96") goes underneath — 96" height fits, 51" width easily fits under 148".

? **All pieces fit in one 96"x148" board.**

---

### ? Best Option: Buy **1 Large Sheet** (96"x148")

* Cost: **\$108**
* Covers: All four wall areas, with extra leftover
* Cheapest per square inch
* Efficient fit with minimal cutting

---

### ? Optional Waste Buffer

If you're concerned about mistakes or cutting waste:

* Add **1 small extra board**: 32"x48" ? \$40
(adds 1,536 in² = 10.67 ft²)

Still total cost = **\$148**

But if you're confident in the cuts, you can stick with just **1 large sheet**.

---

### ? Final Recommendation:

| Board Type | Quantity | Cost |
| --------------------- | ---------------- | --------------- |
| 96"x148" | 1 | \$108 |
| **Optional:** 32"x48" | 1 (extra buffer) | \$40 |
| **Total** | 1 or 2 boards | **\$108–\$148** |

Let me know if you’d like me to diagram the layout on the board!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram