- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/3/26 at 3:44 pm to faraway
quote:
clearly you don't get the point. it's more than just the violent act. you don't see the government protecting mormons or catering to them or arresting people for speaking out against their inappropriate ways.
That wasn't his point, he didn't express that in his post in any way. It was a weak attempt to paint Sikhs, in masse, as a violent group when all data points strongly in the other direction.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 3:46 pm to CatfishJohn
quote:
A tenant of their religion, which was instituted in the 1600s, requires them
Different religion, but the same can be said for Islam when it comes to requiring the true believers to do things. Old and New Testaments have a leg up on both of them IMO.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 3:48 pm to facher08
Wrong again. Proving, why you aren’t worth my time.
I saw Catfish John’s statistics. I’m not arguing that Sikhs are inherently more violent than other cultures or religions.
My point, over the last two pages, for anyone reading above a third-grade level, is that mass immigration and open-border policies inevitably and unnecessarily creates cultural clashes. And yes, I also think the UK’s exemption allowing Sikhs to carry ceremonial daggers is mind-numbingly stupid policy. Pretending that won’t create obvious risks is exactly how you end up with more of these incidents.
I saw Catfish John’s statistics. I’m not arguing that Sikhs are inherently more violent than other cultures or religions.
My point, over the last two pages, for anyone reading above a third-grade level, is that mass immigration and open-border policies inevitably and unnecessarily creates cultural clashes. And yes, I also think the UK’s exemption allowing Sikhs to carry ceremonial daggers is mind-numbingly stupid policy. Pretending that won’t create obvious risks is exactly how you end up with more of these incidents.
This post was edited on 6/3/26 at 3:51 pm
Posted on 6/3/26 at 3:49 pm to Fun Bunch
Aloha Snack Bar! Coming to a neighborhood near you! 
Posted on 6/3/26 at 3:50 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
Wrong again.
You keep responding to me. Do you want me to run along or not?
Posted on 6/3/26 at 3:52 pm to facher08
Do what you please, this ain’t Reddit where you get banned for your opinions. But, I’m still waiting for you to contribute something meaningful other than whining.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 3:52 pm to Shanegolang
quote:
Aloha Snack Bar! Coming to a neighborhood near you!
Ok, I'm out
Posted on 6/3/26 at 3:54 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
Do what you please, this ain’t Reddit where you get banned for your opinions.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 3:55 pm to facher08
Posted on 6/3/26 at 3:57 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
As apart of my religion and culture, I need a “ceremonial” 12-gauge shotgun. It’s completely harmless of course, strictly an artifact of my culture.
This is a weird post.
It implies that a 12 gauge shotgun is inherently dangerous and could only be used for violence.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 4:00 pm to Salmon
nope, strictly ceremonial. that would never happen.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 4:21 pm to Fun Bunch
If those cops had any ounce of shame, decency, or masculinity, they’d have revolted or quit already rather than throw their own white people in jail bc of mean tweets
Posted on 6/3/26 at 4:33 pm to gizmothepug
quote:
but the same can be said for Islam when it comes to requiring the true believers to do things
SIkhs are required to carry the Kirpan. Muslims are required to smite the necks of kaffirs. Wee bit of difference.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 4:59 pm to LemmyLives
quote:
SIkhs are required to carry the Kirpan. Muslims are required to smite the necks of kaffirs. Wee bit of difference.
Is it really more than a wee bit of difference for the person that died at the hands of someone that’s “required” to carry a knife because of religion. horseshite, and horseshite excuses for someone that killed someone and instinctively played the racism angle after the killing.
Also, how long would it take for the law to change when it comes to carrying knives for religious reasons if all the white men used the law as a loophole. A 3 inch pocket knife and a 8 inch dagger are not the same.
This post was edited on 6/3/26 at 5:08 pm
Posted on 6/3/26 at 5:24 pm to faraway
quote:
you don't see the government protecting mormons or catering to them or arresting people for speaking out against their inappropriate ways.
Remember when it was legal to kill mormons?
wiki:
quote:
Missouri Executive Order 44 (known as the Mormon Extermination Order) was a state executive order issued by Missouri Governor Lilburn Boggs on October 27, 1838, in response to the Battle of Crooked River. The clash had been triggered when a state militia unit from Ray County seized several Mormon hostages from Caldwell County, and the subsequent attempt by the Mormons to rescue them.[1]
Based on exaggerated reports of the battle and rumors of Mormon military plans, Boggs claimed that the Mormons had committed "open and avowed defiance of the law" and had "made war upon the people of Missouri".[2] Governor Boggs directed that "the Mormons must be treated as enemies, and must be exterminated or driven from the State if necessary for the public peace—their outrages are beyond all description".[3]
The order was directed to General John Bullock Clark, and it was implemented by the state militia to forcefully displace the Mormons from Missouri. In response to the order, the Mormons surrendered and subsequently sought refuge in Nauvoo, Illinois. In 1976, citing its unconstitutional nature, Missouri governor Kit Bond formally rescinded it.
This post was edited on 6/3/26 at 5:25 pm
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:20 pm to Ailsa
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:20 pm to el Gaucho
quote:
Sikhs are so peaceful?
Aren’t they basically Indian Muslims?
No.
It’s hard for two religions to be more different. Christianity is FAR closer to Islam than Sikhism.
quote:
Sikhism rejects claims that any particular religious tradition has a monopoly on absolute truth. As a consequence, Sikhs do not actively proselytise, although voluntary converts are generally accepted.
Contrast that with Isalm’s “convert them or kill them.”
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:24 pm to Hangover Haven
quote:
Keir Starmer's a wanker
West Bank of the English Channel.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:38 pm to Penrod
I would agree that the murderer is lead more by gang/urban culture than specifically racism, there is a big difference in Sikhs and Muslims as had been mentioned in here.
However, the outrage is not necessarily about a young man being stabbed - as ridiculous as that sounds - it is squarely focused on the police response and various guidance and laws that have led to this.
Namely being the fact that the Kirpan is allowed to be carried given the rise in knife crime over the last decade. Realistically this was not known by 99% of the country before this week showing there is not some epidemic of them being used in attacks.
The other being the Police Act 2025 which specifies people should be treated differently depending on their race / culture by police. This is the latest DEI iniative that has been corrupted into allowing two tier policing and has ultimately helped lead to Henry's tragic death. The officers apathy towards a dying man is heartbreaking and I've struggled to watch the video. The police officer has resigned, from what I'm told this will actually make it harder for him to be investigated criminally, that I suspect will lead to more protests and anger.
However, the outrage is not necessarily about a young man being stabbed - as ridiculous as that sounds - it is squarely focused on the police response and various guidance and laws that have led to this.
Namely being the fact that the Kirpan is allowed to be carried given the rise in knife crime over the last decade. Realistically this was not known by 99% of the country before this week showing there is not some epidemic of them being used in attacks.
The other being the Police Act 2025 which specifies people should be treated differently depending on their race / culture by police. This is the latest DEI iniative that has been corrupted into allowing two tier policing and has ultimately helped lead to Henry's tragic death. The officers apathy towards a dying man is heartbreaking and I've struggled to watch the video. The police officer has resigned, from what I'm told this will actually make it harder for him to be investigated criminally, that I suspect will lead to more protests and anger.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News