Started By
Message

re: Marksville City Marshals......Breaking two officers charged with murder

Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:14 am to
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35926 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:14 am to
quote:

you need to go back and read my posts. I clearly said I am leaning towards them being pieces of shite and if it is determined they were wrong that they get punished to the fullest extent of the law....how exactly is that giving them a pass?


Because you are the only one trying to find ways to absolve them when they alone pulled the trigger and they alone were responsible for the boys death. Everyone else is dealing with the facts at hand and you are the one saying, "But only if he had stopped..."
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35926 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:16 am to
quote:

He has some responsibility for his sons death.


Based on what evidence?
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
70029 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:17 am to
quote:

Based on what evidence?


his son is dead
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35926 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:17 am to
quote:


For all we know they just pulled up next to him and smoked both of them, without a chase.


There was a 9 year old executed in Chicago yesterday because his daddy was in a gang. Jus saying..
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84435 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:17 am to
quote:

It is looking more and more like this was an unjustified shooting. I'm still sickened that he ran with his kid in the truck. That had more to do with his death than anything else IMO. If this guy is worth the air he breathes, he'll spend the rest of his life in morning and start living right.


If the officers neither had a reason nor the authority to pull him over and one of the officers has a personal vendetta against him, what did you expect him to do?

I'm not saying that's what happened, but at this point it's unclear whether the father did anything wrong at all.
Posted by microwavedmarshmallo
Member since Sep 2014
36 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:18 am to
According to Few's fiance, he had a prior personal altercation with the deputy marshal that shot the boy.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35926 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:18 am to
quote:


his son is dead

Derp.
Where is the evidence he is responsible?
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
35877 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:20 am to
quote:

still sickened that he ran with his kid in the truck. That had more to do with his death than anything else IMO.



They were not in their jurisdiction.

If you knew someone with a grudge against you, and the power of office behind him, was out of his jurisdiction but still trying to harass you, would you stop your car for him? With your kid in it? Or would you try to get to safety?
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21764 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Why is the father still alive? If they were looking to "execute" him don't you think they would have succeeded?


Kinda cold to say, but maybe they didn't realize there was a kid in the car until after the shots were fired. They realized they fricked up when they saw the kid was shot, and tried to save him by calling the ambulance. Then the story started to unravel...
Posted by microwavedmarshmallo
Member since Sep 2014
36 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:21 am to
According to the mayor, these "deputies" were a problem since they assumed the position 3 months ago. They are full time police officers whose family members arranged for them to illegally serve as deputy marshals as well.
Posted by bayourougebengal
Member since Mar 2008
7236 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:23 am to
quote:

If the officers neither had a reason nor the authority to pull him over and one of the officers has a personal vendetta against him, what did you expect him to do?

I'm not saying that's what happened, but at this point it's unclear whether the father did anything wrong at all.


You're correct and I'm not trying to argue the legality of his actions. I'm looking at it from a father's perspective right now. If I made a decision to flee (for whatever reason) and the end result was me burying my child, I could never forgive myself.
Posted by bayourougebengal
Member since Mar 2008
7236 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:25 am to
quote:

They were not in their jurisdiction.

If you knew someone with a grudge against you, and the power of office behind him, was out of his jurisdiction but still trying to harass you, would you stop your car for him? With your kid in it? Or would you try to get to safety?


There is no way I would ever, EVER run from a police vehicle. There's never going to be a positive result from that.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84435 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:25 am to
Oh, I'd eat a bullet. As a parent you blame yourself for everything, even when it's not your fault.
This post was edited on 11/6/15 at 10:26 am
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21764 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:27 am to
quote:

If you knew someone with a grudge against you, and the power of office behind him, was out of his jurisdiction but still trying to harass you, would you stop your car for him?


My thoughts exactly. That's some banana republic type shite right there. At least the LSP don't seem to be pulling any favors here, if that's any consolation.
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
16146 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:27 am to
The small town aspect of this makes me hope the justice department takes a look.
Posted by dagrippa
Saigon
Member since Nov 2004
12171 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:28 am to
quote:

his son is dead


Either troll or dense.

I suppose you could argue he has some responsibility, yes. Had the father never met the kids mom, the kid would never have been born. Therefore the father is in a way responsible. So is the mother. In fact, had Henry Ford not perfected mass production of vehicles we might have another means of transportation. The kid would never had been in a car to be shot. Therefore, Henry Ford is also somewhat responsible. Did we talk about the invention of the gun or gunpowder yet?
Posted by bayourougebengal
Member since Mar 2008
7236 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:28 am to
quote:

SabiDojo


We definitely haven't been on the same side of the fence on this issue up until now.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35926 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:28 am to
quote:

That's some banana republic type shite right there.


I'm definitely stealing this little gem!
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84435 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:31 am to
quote:

We definitely haven't been on the same side of the fence on this issue up until now.


Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35926 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:33 am to
quote:

I suppose you could argue he has some responsibility, yes. Had the father never met the kids mom, the kid would never have been born. Therefore the father is in a way responsible. So is the mother. In fact, had Henry Ford not perfected mass production of vehicles we might have another means of transportation. The kid would never had been in a car to be shot. Therefore, Henry Ford is also somewhat responsible. Did we talk about the invention of the gun or gunpowder yet?


Ban Henry Ford!!!
Jump to page
Page First 25 26 27 28 29 ... 54
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 27 of 54Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram