- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Man charged with recording sexual acts of Madison Brooks
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:18 am to lsupride87
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:18 am to lsupride87
You obviously know everything. Just like you knew there was no way FSU was being left out. You're infallible and I don't know why any would dare question your expertise on everything
1
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:19 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
You're right sfp, no one ever been charged for multiple crimes when one of them carries a possible life sentence
Filing an indictment for a minor felony (this is probably a 5-year max penalty but could be as low as 2) 6 months after the original indictment is not exactly normal. Especially for a concurrent crime.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:20 am to LNCHBOX
quote:Why are you melting in here?
You obviously know everything. Just like you knew there was no way FSU was being left out. You're infallible and I don't know why any would dare question your expertise on everything
The original testimony by far is the only flaming piece of evidence we know of. Could the DA be holding something back? I guess, but tell me why would he be doing that?
I am only speaking to what WE KNOW. And what we know, the original testimony is the only damning piece of evidence that leads to rape
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:20 am to SlowFlowPro
Doesn't really address the issue, but you knew that.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:21 am to lsupride87
quote:
Why are you melting in here?
Questioning you is melting. You and shell are two peas in a pod
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:22 am to LNCHBOX
You are in here arguing with an attorney while talking down to others giving opinions for not being in the profession
It’s awesome to see
It’s awesome to see
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:23 am to JDPndahizzy
If you know anything about drinking and young men you knew this was what was happening.
You cant consent under the influence of alcohol. They raped her.
You cant consent under the influence of alcohol. They raped her.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:24 am to jrobic4
quote:
And when he gets a lesser sentence for cooperating, the Usual Suspects will cry racism
frick em. They can always confess/plea for a lighter sentence.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:26 am to lsupride87
quote:
Could the DA be holding something back? I guess, but tell me why would he be doing that?
You bring up a point I was wondering about. Is the only reason the DA is releasing stuff is because the defense is going on TV with all kinds of other stuff?
You don't really see cases in the media where you are getting tidbits leading up to the trial.
Not addressing you directly.
This post was edited on 1/12/24 at 10:27 am
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:27 am to lsupride87
quote:
You are in here arguing with an attorney
You're an attorney now?
quote:
while talking down to others giving opinions for not being in the profession
You speak as if what you say is fact. That is why I "talk down" to you by simply asking how much expertise you have.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:28 am to LNCHBOX
quote:Ahh, yes, and you speak with such a gentlemanly natured tone on this site
You speak as if what you say is fact
Sack up lnch
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:29 am to Smelder
quote:
To me it seems it wasn’t “rape” or forceful rape. It was a girl highly intoxicated and being taken advantage of while being filmed.
that is rape.
an intoxicated person cannot give consent.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:30 am to LSU fan 246
chad, sfp, lunch, and pride going at it... i'm sure we'll get to the bottom of this before lunch
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:30 am to LSU fan 246
quote:I feel like DAs often try cases in the media. They are elected officials after all.
You bring up a point I was wondering about. Is the only reason the DA is releasing stuff is because the defense is going on TV with all kinds of other stuff? You don't really see cases in the media where you are getting tidbits leading up to the trial.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:30 am to lsupride87
quote:
I’m sure she is. But it sure seems like the DA is doing anything it can to get Carver to flip. Without him and his previous testimony they don’t have much
What are you talking about? They have signed confessions
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:30 am to MikeHoncho47
quote:
That picture of the baseball player in OP is his brother. Not the one arrested.
Yeah, that pic was added later and should be removed.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:30 am to tigernurse
quote:Right. But what if both parties are drunk? I’d say 75% of college one night stands are between two drunk individuals
an intoxicated person cannot give consent.
This post was edited on 1/12/24 at 10:31 am
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:30 am to lsupride87
quote:
feel like DAs often try cases in the media. They are elected officials after all.
That’s what the defense is trying to do in this case
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:32 am to GreatLakesTiger24
Is this the lunch thread?
Catfish poboy
Catfish poboy
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:32 am to Proximo
quote:Agreed. Just speaking in generalities with that post
That’s what the defense is trying to do in this case
Page 4 of 10
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News