- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Major wildfire in Los Angeles (and Pasadena)
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:11 am to LegendInMyMind
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:11 am to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Yet, I get downvoted to shite for saying it. The Fed, State, local, and native entities burned more than a million acres in 2024. That total doesn't include most of the private land that was burned. The Feds burned more last year than they had in any year they have records for. They've also had a bunch of pile burns that don't show up in the acreage totals.
But we got ole Hofag over here telling us we are reading the Watch Duty map wrong
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:11 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Sitting here listening to this press conference I had to chuckle a bit. This lady is threatening to release the full force of the law against looters who are stealing from private citizens. Where was that energy when they were stealing from Walmart and Target? All I heard was "They have insurance"
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:13 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Because there's zero politics at play here.
90mph winds and zero rain in almost a year has nothing to do with politics. These fires would rage even under the most conservative municipal and state government.
Texas, Florida and other gulf states have had their fair share of natural disasters. Minnesota is as left wing as they come and seems immune. It's not a political thing.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:17 am to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Don't encourage this shite, Rummy......end it.
Seconded.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:18 am to OMLandshark
quote:
OMLandshark
frick off with this defense. She’s worse than Garcetti. She should not be given the benefit of the doubt and resign in disgrace. I hope one of the citizens throws a Molotov cocktail into her empty car (ie no fatalities) and the jury lets that person off since she did this to thousands of them.
Cant disagree.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:20 am to 632627
quote:spot on.
90mph winds and zero rain in almost a year has nothing to do with politics. These fires would rage even under the most conservative municipal and state government.
Texas, Florida and other gulf states have had their fair share of natural disasters. Minnesota is as left wing as they come and seems immune. It's not a political thing.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:20 am to LegendInMyMind
quote:
He’s gotta be close to a timeout…no?
You would really, really think.
Interesting. Let's contain opinions we disagree with.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:20 am to Bobby OG Johnson
quote:You don’t even need to act if you are a terrorist.
Sadly my list contains domestics as the first suspects to look for
Homeless
Climate Activists
Pay some homeless person $100 and get them to start fires.
They don’t give a shite.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:22 am to Scruffy
the real fire season for California doesn't begin until June so this one is kind of an outlier which is really scary
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:23 am to TheSadvocate
quote:
Where was that energy when they were stealing from Walmart and Target?
These government officially don't want to get uninvited from the hollywood pedo parties
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:25 am to 632627
You're on drugs if you think Texas/Florida would not have a significantly better response to a crisis like this. And we don't even have big wildfires.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:26 am to 632627
quote:I don’t disagree on part of your statement.
90mph winds and zero rain in almost a year has nothing to do with politics. These fires would rage even under the most conservative municipal and state government.
90 mph winds would make this incredibly hard to fight anywhere.
Where the issue arises is that all things that COULD HAVE helped were neglected, apparently.
Letting rainwater runoff into the ocean for the sake of a fish species
Focusing on DEI measures rather than a streamlined fire department
Maintaining an adequate water delivery system
Appropriately clearing underbrush
These are all fair game to criticize, and should be criticized heavily.
I agree that this could not have been prevented, but the available response and containment sure as hell could have been significantly better.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:27 am to Scruffy
quote:
These are all fair game to criticize, and should be criticized heavily.
Nah, bruh. Bringing up common sense is political. We can't have that in this thread.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:27 am to 632627
quote:
90mph winds and zero rain in almost a year has nothing to do with politics. These fires would rage even under the most conservative municipal and state government.
Texas, Florida and other gulf states have had their fair share of natural disasters. Minnesota is as left wing as they come and seems immune. It's not a political thing.
I promise you Florida would have easily had a better response.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:31 am to holdmuh keystonelite
quote:
I promise you Florida would have easily had a better response.
Please elaborate. CA firefighters work like a well oiled machine from my experience. Outside of the clusterfrick that is this Palisades fire, watching their response is pretty incredible.
This post was edited on 1/9/25 at 10:33 am
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:32 am to Scruffy
Doesn’t matter. No water system is designed to fight this many fires at once.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:33 am to Packer
quote:
I promise you Florida would have easily had a better response.
Please elaborate.

Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:33 am to nicholastiger
quote:
the real fire season for California doesn't begin until June
Can't have a fire season later if everything is burned now
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:33 am to TheOcean
it is not that the political side doesn't need to be discussed, it is that it is a very slipper slope - it always devolves into Poli board bullshite.
it is not that some of us don't want the discussion - we just don't want it taking over the entire thread - which history has proven will happen.
it is not that some of us don't want the discussion - we just don't want it taking over the entire thread - which history has proven will happen.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:35 am to olemc999
I believe that was me in another thread. I was referencing something I read years ago, but there are similar points in this article
This post was edited on 1/9/25 at 10:37 am
Popular
Back to top


0






