- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/26/25 at 3:29 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
However, I think Brook's dad is bringing a civil suit against Uber.
It's Lyft and he's suing the driver too.
quote:
WAFB from 9/15/2023
According to the lawsuit, John Brooks is suing the following:
Reggie’s Bar, owners Darin Adams and John Landry, all four bartenders, and managers Andy Gleneck, Alex Schexnayder, Landon Rees, and Jackson Robichaux.
Four accused Kaivon Washington, Desmond Carter, Casen Carver, and Everette Lee.
Lyft driver James Hayward Jr. and Lyft Inc.
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company.
Insurance companies DEF Insurance, XYZ Insurance, XXX Insurance, and SafeCo. Insurance.
In the lawsuit, Brooks blames all of these induvial for the cause of Madison Brooks’ death that night.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 3:32 pm to ell_13
quote:tale as old as time....
There were questions about how involved he still was in her life
Posted on 2/26/25 at 3:39 pm to HeadCall
rape & negligent homicide
Posted on 2/26/25 at 3:40 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
No sober, reasonable person would consider it kidnapping had they postponed letting her out until they could do in a better site.
There have been posters in these discussions who accused them of kidnapping her given the facts we have. I believe Chad led this charge the last time a Madison Brooks discussion popped up.
Hell, it took a while until a lot of people would understand that just because it involved rape and black guys/pretty white girl, it wasn't the forceful kind. That was this assumption/belief that took a lot of posting to unwind.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 3:45 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
Girl was ugly, fat, or a different color this is a non story.
Sure, if it was three whites accused of raping a black girl who subsequently was killed, it would be different alright.
Almost as if something like this did happen at Duke. We all witnessed how the black girl was believed and about to ruin dozens of white boy's lives. It was all over the national news. But yeah, non story because she was black.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 3:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:That was the narrative from the get go until the video came out and even then it was still the prevailing story for anyone who didn’t read beyond the initial headline. It’s the same people who still think she was thrown out of the car in the middle of a busy highway in the rain.
There have been posters in these discussions who accused them of kidnapping her given the facts we have. I believe Chad led this charge the last time a Madison Brooks discussion popped up.
This post was edited on 2/26/25 at 3:48 pm
Posted on 2/26/25 at 3:57 pm to ell_13
Correct.
It's a terrible situation. I have no idea why they feel it's productive to include all the bullshite on top. It's never made sense to me.
It's a terrible situation. I have no idea why they feel it's productive to include all the bullshite on top. It's never made sense to me.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 4:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There have been posters in these discussions who accused them of kidnapping her given the facts we have. I believe Chad led this charge the last time a Madison Brooks discussion popped up.
That's not describing the kidnap angle discussed above. In that one, it's being questioned could they have accused of kidnapping had they not let her out at 2AM.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 4:30 pm to AlwysATgr
No you're not listening.
People think that they should have been charged with kidnapping WITHOUT that hypothetical "force" being introduced. So yeah, they'd obviously think an activity they could interpret as force would follow suit with their preconceived notions of the event.
People think that they should have been charged with kidnapping WITHOUT that hypothetical "force" being introduced. So yeah, they'd obviously think an activity they could interpret as force would follow suit with their preconceived notions of the event.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 5:44 pm to HeadCall
quote:
How come it’s okay to call these guys rapists and POS and drag their names through the mud even though haven’t been convicted of anything but no one can say a bad word about Madison?
Because there is already enough evidence that she could not consent, and that multiple guys committed 3rd degree rape, at minimum. So yes, we can call them the animals they are.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 6:00 pm to dragginass
What evidence? Being drunk alone isn’t enough. The police report with the driver’s opinion isn’t enough. Was there coercion? Was there force? At any point did she show a desire not to? It seems all of those questions are yet to be answered or may never be.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 6:01 pm to ell_13
Her BAC was 0.3. You cannot consent at that level, and that is exactly what 3rd degree rape is. They are guilty of that, at minimum.
This post was edited on 2/26/25 at 6:02 pm
Posted on 2/26/25 at 6:05 pm to dragginass
quote:
Her BAC was 0.3. You cannot consent at that level, and that is exactly what 3rd degree rape is.
Is there a legal statute that defines 0.3 as to drunk to consent?
Posted on 2/26/25 at 6:06 pm to dragginass
But why was her level at 0.3???? Did someone spike her drink??? Or did people just keep feeding or buying her drinks??? Why did she continue to drink till she got in that position???? Where were her friends that she could not find???
Posted on 2/26/25 at 6:17 pm to dukke v
She was steeling drinks off of tables according to reports. And she let her friends leave because she told them she wanted to stay with the guys. Sucks but that would answer your questions and put her as the instigator which is also what was shown on camera inside the bar.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 6:18 pm to HeadCall
quote:No
Is there a legal statute that defines 0.3 as to drunk to consent?
Posted on 2/26/25 at 6:22 pm to HeadCall
quote:
Is there a legal statute that defines 0.3 as to drunk to consent?
At 0.3, she was nearly comatose. She was clearly drunk and unable to consent.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 6:24 pm to dragginass
quote:
At 0.3, she was nearly comatose. She was clearly drunk and unable to consent.
Comatose people don’t sprint across parking lots and cal dudes figs for not banging them.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 6:26 pm to dragginass
That number has been disputed fwiw. But it’s not the end all be all for consent. And we don’t know the amount when the acts took place. She could have been much more sober before the alcohol had a chance to enter her blood stream.
Page 26 of 35
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News