re: Madison Brooks case updates

quote:

---

3. They didn't "dump" her.

---

They left her at a house that wasn’t hers unceremoniously after again double raping her (pretty sure the state is going after all 3 for aggravated rape but whatever you want to call it SFP)

she wanders around trying to find her house. She gets hit by a car and killed.

Yeah these guys were perfect gentlemen. Christ dude. Yall are a bunch of creeps who have never actually known how to properly treat a woman. I’m disgusted.

quote:

---

This thread is a shining example of why most women don't want men approaching them anymore when out drinking.

---

Yeah unbelievable there’s guys out there thinking “yeah she sounds good to go”

quote:

---

They left her at a house that wasn’t hers

---

Was it where she asked them to let her out?

quote:

---

(pretty sure the state is going after all 3

---

The state is reaching to create 1st degree rape. Neither Carver nor the old man had sexual contact with her. The old man hasn't been charged with anything, as far as I know.

quote:

---

Yeah these guys were perfect gentlemen

---

And here comes the emotional-based deflection

Pointing out the bullshite I said means you're defending rapists



This is why a rational discussion on this case cannot be had on here. People like you make shite up and when the lies are pointed out, you engage in the highest form of dishonesty.

quote:

---

Yall are a bunch of creeps who have never actually known how to properly treat a woman. I’m disgusted.

---

HOLY shite. The rare triple down of dishonesty.

quote:

---

Lotta people in this thread deemed this girl deserved what happened to her because of her taste in men. I know that because my own family members have as well. Disgusting!

---

No one deserves to be killed by walking blindly drunk into traffic after having blindly-drunk requested being train railed by rough-hewn strangers in the backseat of a car.

But there is some moral blame to be passed around.

This was a contact point between two toxic cultures.

One gets talked about and is well known, but is also defended by the words of woke victim culture. Overly sexualized and irresponsible young men are taught by powerful cultural influences that they are victims because of their race, are not taught any responsibility much less sexual responsibility, and are actively encouraged to treat women as cum dumpsters.

The other culture is also one of irresponsibility. Some young white women, especially pretty and well-off white young women, are affected by a host of cultural influences including radical feminism, that they can and should be as sexually promiscuous as the worst of male sexual deviants. In the college bar, sorority slut milieu, they make no secret of their desire to get smashed on alcohol and to get smashed by bad boys.

This case is a social conundrum in many ways, but the legal definitions might be the deciding factor. The level of drunkenness of this woman as perceived by the least drunk participant(s) will be the deciding factor, IMO.

When you state on camera for all in the car to hear, “we/they are about to rape this girl”, then you now own the responsibility for how the girl is treated, no matter how irresponsible her words and actions are.

quote:

---

People like slowflowpro are disgusting bitches hiding behind his profession as if he doesn’t have a proraper stance. He’s not making any money off this case but chooses to be here trying to manipulate things in favor of rapers. One of which is a serial raper.

---

quote:

---

When you state on camera for all in the car to hear, “we/they are about to rape this girl”, then you now own the responsibility for how the girl is treated, no matter how irresponsible her words and actions are.

---

I had not previously heard this part. That is pretty damning.

This case like few others in OT history showcases dishonest framing in an attempt to silence rational discussion.

Chad would have tried to shame Atticus Finch for defending Tom Robinson

quote:

---

In Louisiana being present and assisting in an aggravated rape can lead you to be charged with aggravated rape as a co conspirator without sexual contact

---

I already said that they were reaching. Thank you for confirming. They likely included him due to racial optics of the situation. You know that they are desperate when they added a video of voyeurism charge very late in the game. They know that they can get the other two unless they're includeds, the actual crime of third degree rate that they should have been charged with, and they can't get that against Carver. Carver. If they were confident in their first degree rape charge, they would have never added the video voyeurism charges out of nowhere. They want to leave with some sort of scalp against him.

quote:

---

Also remembered this is SFP. This guy just lived to troll

---

Ironically said by the man engaging in dishonest framing

quote:

---

but I get why women are legit scared of men sometimes.

---

But this is not that scenario. If it was then this case would never get discussed because it would be open and shut.

If I remember correctly she was dancing with one of the guys in the bar, she was talking to them when the lights came on at 2AM.

She left them to find her friends to go home but the friends had left. She went up to the guys and asked for a ride and they agreed.

That is how she ended up in their car.

the DA's office has filed a motion for recusal of judge shitbird, under seal.

quote:

---

She signed an order on Friday putting the state's motion for her recusal up for a different judge to hear. Court records show the matter was reallocated to District Judge Brad Myers, who will hear the prosecution’s arguments for Ray’s removal. By Monday afternoon, no date had been set for the recusal hearing.

---

carver's bench trial date is dec 1st

quote:

---

Ray has made key rulings regarding evidence disclosures and issued a gag order two years ago, which barred attorneys from publicly disclosing certain documents in the case file. She sided with Carver's attorney last year in a fight over Brooks' past sexual history. Long sought to have an LSU student testify about an alleged sexual encounter he had with Brooks the day before she died, saying it could refute prosecutors' allegations that Washington and Carter caused the sex-related injuries listed in Brooks’ autopsy report. Ray ruled it admissible, but the First Circuit Court of Appeals overturned her decision in March, excluding evidence of Brooks' past sexual history.

---

my question is, why would this testimony be given in Carver's trial? Carver has been acknowledged as not having touched her