- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/20/17 at 8:59 am to 50_Tiger
At the least, taking money away from some of the lower performing schools *coughSUNOcough* could direct funds toward schools which actually show results.
The slices of the pie for each school tend to get bigger if you slice it into fewer pieces.
The slices of the pie for each school tend to get bigger if you slice it into fewer pieces.
Posted on 9/20/17 at 8:59 am to Gnarkill
quote:
Of course we need to hold our policy makers and politicians to a higher standard
^^^This. I wouldn't trust Rebekah Gee to plan my kid's birthday party, much less manage the $14 billion DHH budget.
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:00 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
We have way too many schools. You don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about.
Regrdless of whether or not this is a fact, the general attitude in the state is that people don't want to pay another nickel for education. Everything is already "good enough".
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:00 am to NIH
quote:
What's your solution?
Close some fricking schools, or sell one of them off to another system. This state is relatively small.
LSU doesn't need two medical schools.
quote:
And how is any of that admitting to having an alter ?
You replied to my reply to someone else asking if your posts hurt my feelings.
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:01 am to teke184
quote:
At the least, taking money away from some of the lower performing schools *coughSUNOcough* could direct funds toward schools which actually show results.
The slices of the pie for each school tend to get bigger if you slice it into fewer pieces.
I would be all for local 4 years every where if the economy and revenue supported it.
Right now La can't afford soap.
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:01 am to Tiger in NY
quote:
Regrdless of whether or not this is a fact,
quote:
the general attitude in the state is that people don't want to pay another nickel for education. Everything is already "good enough".
Not once will you be able to show me saying our education system is good enough. Run along now.
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:02 am to lsuson
quote:
Does LSU need two medical schools??????
Yes. As a state we are not producing enough doctors to replace the one's we are losing.
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:03 am to 50_Tiger
quote:
You just need to make North LA choose to come South to the larger populations to go to medical school.
Well, since Shreveport serves more patients than New Orleans that is pretty contradictory.
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:04 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Not once will you be able to show me saying our education system is good enough. Run along now.
I said the general attitude.
I get where it comes from, because every time there is added revenues, the crooked arse state politicians pilfer it, but it has created a terrible situation.
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:04 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
You replied to my reply to someone else asking if your posts hurt my feelings.
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:05 am to LNCHBOX
I will say this thread pops up every month and we all argue the same shite.
North LA -> Tech / Northwestern / ULM
Central LA -> LSU
South LA -> LSU / UNO / ULL
LSU means the Med School and any other specific school.
All the others would just have to either go away or reduce degree plans until the state can catch up.
North LA -> Tech / Northwestern / ULM
Central LA -> LSU
South LA -> LSU / UNO / ULL
LSU means the Med School and any other specific school.
All the others would just have to either go away or reduce degree plans until the state can catch up.
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:05 am to Drunken Crawfish
quote:
Well, since Shreveport serves more patients than New Orleans that is pretty contradictory.
Who said the doctors had to come from Shreveport?
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:05 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
LSU doesn't need two medical schools.
No, but the state does
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:06 am to TaderSalad
quote:
I smell another tax increase. Might even get to 12% sales tax before long.
This state is committing suicide.
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:08 am to 50_Tiger
New Orleans can't even educate all of its students in New Orleans (students go all over south LA) much less add on another 100.
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:10 am to Adam Banks
quote:
New Orleans can't even educate all of its students in New Orleans (students go all over south LA) much less add on another 100.
Im arguing efficiency without compromising quality.
Less places to send resources allows the main posts to have the correct and necessary amount of resources.
It's not like voters in La will grow a pair and demand the La Constitution be rewritten. Yall keep voting the same blood suckers in.
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:10 am to lsuson
quote:
Does LSU need two medical schools??????
Does north Louisiana not need doctors?
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:10 am to Adam Banks
Shut down Shreveport and the newly expanded Baton Rouge medical school operations and guess what LSU will have more money and the rural communities will still have the same number of physicians that they have now.
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:10 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
I mean, LSU really doesn't need to fund two medical schools. If you can't make the cut to get in the NOLA location, maybe you should take that as a sign.
LOL. You really have no idea of what you're talking about.
Popular
Back to top



1






