Started By
Message

re: Louisiana private school boots kindergartener after her adoption by same-sex parents

Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:07 pm to
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50580 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Ahh. Right. Forgot John 3:47

“Sinning in secret is better than sinning in public.”


There is absolutely a Biblical difference between struggling with sin and flaunting your sin. When you flaunt your sin, you show that you are rejecting Christ.

1 John 3:8-10

quote:

Whoever makes a practice of sinning is of the devil, for the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the works of the devil. No one born of God makes a practice of sinning, for God's seed abides in him, and he cannot keep on sinning because he has been born of God. By this it is evident who are the children of God, and who are the children of the devil: whoever does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor is the one who does not love his brother.


Hebrews 10:26

quote:

For if we go on sinning deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins,
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
23965 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

It really is a blessing in disguise for this girl. She would likely not be received well by these families (birthday parties, sleepovers, etc.) and the adoptive moms surely wouldn't be. In addition, the school actively teaches the "truth of the Bible" (their words). This girl would feel awkward in that scenario.


And she may get a better education. Not much value in 1 + 1=Jesus
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
11671 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

If it is a mortal sin then I would agree.


Like no fault divorce
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
35431 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

No one is stopping them from hearing the gospel.


No one said they are.

I'm saying that the school is refusing to spread the gospel to the little girl based upon an affiliation that she did not choose.

That is, imo, sinful and I believe scripture would argue that intentionally refusing to spread the gospel to those who seek it is on par, if not worse than being gay.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66700 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Wouldn't the same argument be applicable to a gay couple denied membership in church?


Yea it would

quote:

This really comes down to whether admission/membership is akin to your example of someone seeking to hear the Gospel and not receiving it.


Some of y’all will harass people on Bourbon street but you think it would be too much to let a gay person go to your church?
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66700 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:13 pm to
Now tell Me about the sinners kids.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79262 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Some of y’all will harass people on Bourbon street but you think it would be too much to let a gay person go to your church?



come again
Posted by BR92
Member since Apr 2021
849 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Some of y’all will harass people on Bourbon street but you think it would be too much to let a gay person go to your church?


Has anyone told them not to come to church ?
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50580 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

Now tell Me about the sinners kids.


The school's statement clearly says they want students who go to school there to be witness to a Biblical worldview. They don't take students they know are not getting that worldview at home.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66700 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Has anyone told them not to come to church


That was the hypo posited by the poster I was Replying to.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66700 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

The school's statement clearly says they want students who go to school there to be witness to a Biblical worldview. They don't take students they know are not getting that worldview at home.


It’s weird you stopped quoting the Bible with this post.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50580 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

It’s weird you stopped quoting the Bible with this post.


I've only quoted the Bible once in this thread, in response to someone who misquoted the Bible, so...not really.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79262 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:20 pm to
Well, it wasn't about attending church, it was about membership in church, which is a pretty big distinction in these discussions FWIW.

I've never been part of a church that would bar gay people from attending. From membership, or involvement that would otherwise be akin to membership, leadership, etc.? Yes. But not attending.
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
7342 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

The school's statement clearly says they want students who go to school there to be witness to a Biblical worldview. They don't take students they know are not getting that worldview at home.


So why not put the onerous on the parents to reject the school instead of the school rejecting the child?
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66700 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

I've only quoted the Bible once in this thread, in response to someone who misquoted the Bible, so...not really.


Well that was the post I replied To and asked you to make that argument extend to the kid.

So it is weird you just posted the schools excuse.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50580 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

So why not put the onerous on the parents to reject the school instead of the school rejecting the child?


This seems like a distinction without a difference. They are rejecting what the requirements of the school are.
This post was edited on 8/10/22 at 1:39 pm
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
7342 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

requirements of the school.


Thats what Im questioning.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
18303 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:39 pm to
So I did a little digging and a certain boy with the same last name as this school/church's pastor has a baby born February 2022...with a marriage date of October 2021...

What does that mean
Posted by Abstract Queso Dip
Member since Mar 2021
5878 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:43 pm to
I agree.
Another important aspect is that teachers are some of the most important people in a child's life. I would be interested to know if the child's new teacher is a member of the church. How should church members think of that teacher. How would church members treat the child if one of her friends brought her to Sunday school should the church ban the girl from going to church and attending Sunday school all because her adoptive parents are gay. Is this child permanently tainted the Lord and savior will never forgive her. It is just odd because by some people's logic on here she shouldn't be allowed to go to church.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79262 posts
Posted on 8/10/22 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

It is just odd because by some people's logic on here she shouldn't be allowed to go to church.


Is that true?
Jump to page
Page First 19 20 21 22 23 24
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 21 of 24Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram