- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Louisiana Grand Jury Indicts N.Y. Doctor Who Prescribed Abortion Pill Louisiana Teen Took
Posted on 2/1/25 at 11:46 am to chalmetteowl
Posted on 2/1/25 at 11:46 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
Not in New York Why do we have such a hard time understanding jurisdiction?
Did the doctor mail the meds to an address in NY or to a state were the drugs were illegal?
Posted on 2/1/25 at 11:51 am to Hot Carl
quote:
But it’s the online thing that could be slippery. How much due diligence is required to make sure you are sending a script to a person actually in a state where it’s still legal? I’m curious about the answers to these questions even if this particular case doesn’t fit them.
Well I can tell you when I purchase drum mags or extended clip mags, they have notes on the website not available to purchase for CA residents or will be shipped to that state.
I woukd think they woukd take killing babies more serious than mags that hold a few extra rounds.
But these are democrats we are talking about….
This post was edited on 2/1/25 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 2/1/25 at 12:00 pm to Optimism
quote:
Why are the libs obsessed with killing babies even if states they don’t live in ?
Why are the pubs obsessed with forcing birth on literal children, even in cases of rape and incest?
Posted on 2/1/25 at 12:12 pm to CrystalPreserves
quote:
even in cases of rape and incest?
This is such a small fraction of the cases that using it as any kind of argument is pretty silly.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 12:30 pm to CrystalPreserves
quote:
Why are the pubs obsessed with forcing birth on literal children, even in cases of rape and incest?
Only 1% of abortion is because of rape, and only .5% because of incest. That’s 1.5% if you want to assume there’s no overlap. USA Today article, not a conservative website
Meanwhile 24% of abortions are unwanted or coerced, and 43% inconsistent with values and preferences. Peer reviewed study
Why do you sick leftist use your weak strawmen to push your love of dead babies?
This case fits into that 24%. I’m glad that Louisiana is going to help this girl get justice.
This post was edited on 2/1/25 at 12:31 pm
Posted on 2/1/25 at 12:30 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
This is such a small fraction of the cases that using it as any kind of argument is pretty silly.
Talk about silly arguments. You'd be fine with your wife or daughter having to go through pregnancy in this scenario? You support trans men competing with women because there's not that many?
Posted on 2/1/25 at 12:32 pm to tide06
quote:
Its going to be wild to see the political schism play out through legal means at the state level across the country.
I'm not sure where this ends.
California is forcing credit card companies to record purchases of guns and ammo under a different Nasics code, obviously an attempt to end around creating a list of gun owners. This isn't just a red issue.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 12:36 pm to Bard
quote:
This is going to be interesting. Where the doctor presides and from where she prescribed it, it's legal. Where the person getting the prescription resides and where she received it, it's illegal.
State law regarding licensure and not practicing without it seems pretty cut and dry. I can't go places and just act as a CPA, need to be licensed with that state and/or through other legal processes.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 12:38 pm to LNCHBOX
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/1/25 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 2/1/25 at 12:41 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
How are we charging a doctor who never had to set foot in LA to do what she did… seems like that’s overreach. If what she did was legal where she did it there’s nothing we can do
Posted on 2/1/25 at 12:45 pm to chalmetteowl
It's comical you think this is a slippery slope. States have long banned and gone after people for shipping contraband into their states. Thanks to Wayfair, you can and are instructed to collect sales tax for states you don't even have true nexus in.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 12:46 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
better to not speak than open your mouth and spew ignorance.
Would you want another state to prosecute you for what’s legal here?
Posted on 2/1/25 at 12:48 pm to CrystalPreserves
quote:
cases of rape and incest
Because the logical argument is “it’s a human life, and it has value.”
You can debate whether it’s a human life.
You can debate whether human life has value.
But any argument that writes an exception for rape and incest has to use the logic that “most” human life has value instead of “all,” and you wind up with a very slippery slope that doesn’t make much logical sense.
This post was edited on 2/1/25 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 2/1/25 at 12:50 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
This is stupid. You can only practice medicine in a state you’re physically in. You’re not practicing medicine in a state you’re not in. The patient using telehealth would be like any patient who lives across state lines and visits a doctor in that state (and we’d be dumb to criminalize that because people cross state lines for care for legitimate reasons)
Is this true anymore. I see and hear plenty of commercials that advertise online medical evaluation and prescriptions?
This post was edited on 2/1/25 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 2/1/25 at 12:54 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
Would you want another state to prosecute you for what’s legal here?
Again, if I mail shite to another state, yes I take the risk of being prosecuted to where I mail it to. This slope was maybe slippery before USPS was created?
Posted on 2/1/25 at 12:55 pm to CPT Tiger
quote:
Is this true anymore. I see and hear plenty of commercials that advertise online medical evaluation and prescriptions?
These are for medications legal in both sending and receiving states.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 12:55 pm to lepdagod
quote:
Yeah the doctor innocent… what people expect to happen when abortion illegal in some states… someone of more means financially probably would have went to New York to have it done… those who can’t afford it will use the mail… who couldn’t see this coming???
Interstate commerce
Posted on 2/1/25 at 12:56 pm to Jcorye1
Does this clown really think it is ok to mail something illegal to a state just because it is legal in the sender's state? That can't really be his argument.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 1:01 pm to chalmetteowl
Could she be any bigger piece of shite?
Posted on 2/1/25 at 1:08 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
California is forcing credit card companies to record purchases of guns and ammo under a different Nasics code, obviously an attempt to end around creating a list of gun owners. This isn't just a red issue.
I certainly didn’t mean to imply that it was.
What I do mean to imply is that what has been a cold civil war of words is now escalating into a warmer civil war of state judicial action codifying political positions that will become more and more antagonistic towards the opposing side.
It’s devolved into a zero sum game and after Trump was targeted by NY and GA I believe you will see that reciprocated in red states against political figures from the left. Where that ends isn’t somewhere sustainable for a shared republic.
This post was edited on 2/1/25 at 1:09 pm
Back to top


0




