- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/14/20 at 11:31 am to Indefatigable
quote:Good. That’s what I want my American President to think
He even came out afterwards and said he chose the lives of our soldiers over the live of their civilians.
Posted on 8/14/20 at 11:31 am to lsupride87
quote:
If we invaded, every single man, woman, and child in Japan would have had a gun and would be fighting
So yes, we would have been targeting everyone
Maybe, but again, they would have been combatants at that point.
Posted on 8/14/20 at 11:32 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:Would that help you sleep better at night?
Maybe, but again, they would have been combatants at that point.
I’m glad we dropped the bombs. Likely saved my grandfathers life. Sucks for them, but their govt picked a fight that it lost.
Our job is to save American lives, not foreign ones
Posted on 8/14/20 at 11:33 am to lsupride87
quote:
Would that help you sleep better at night?
I sleep fine. Why does this discussion make you so angry?
Posted on 8/14/20 at 11:37 am to FightingTigers138
It's very easy to make hindsight judgments some 75 years after the fact. Please remember that the world had been at war since 1939 (though many historians view the Japanese invasion of China in 1937 as the start of WWII) and roughly 85 million people had been killed. The United States had lost over 400,000 servicemen in the fighting, with roughly 30,000 of those fatalities coming in the last two battles of the Pacific War (Iwo Jima and Okinawa). It is very likely that an invasion of mainland Japan would have cost us an additional 100,000 American lives before it was all said and done.
In a war that had killed so many in so little time, what was 80,000 civilian deaths compared to the possible alternative of an entire nation being wiped off the map in a ground invasion?
In a war that had killed so many in so little time, what was 80,000 civilian deaths compared to the possible alternative of an entire nation being wiped off the map in a ground invasion?
Posted on 8/14/20 at 11:37 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:Wait a minute, you can give your opinion and that’s normal
I sleep fine. Why does this discussion make you so angry?
If I give mine I’m angry?
Posted on 8/14/20 at 11:38 am to FightingTigers138
quote:
Yes, let's celebrate a drunken gambler (Truman), killing an enormous number of innocent civilians. Which caused birth defects for several generations after. What a great moment in history.
That's exactly what I am going to do, celebrate America kicking some arse
Posted on 8/14/20 at 11:40 am to lsupride87
quote:
If I give mine I’m angry?
When someone automatically goes to casting personal aspersions, I assume the discussion is making them emotional.
Posted on 8/14/20 at 11:40 am to RollTide1987
This article from The Atlantic sums up the pro-bomb argument very well. There's also a reply from Truman
The Atlantic 1946
The Atlantic 1946
Posted on 8/14/20 at 11:41 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:Like calling someone angry?
When someone automatically goes to casting personal aspersions
Posted on 8/14/20 at 11:42 am to Indefatigable
quote:
Why are you making this thread about the bombs, when that is not what V-J day is? The bombs were dropped 8/6 and 8/9. The decision to drop the bombs is certainly worth discussion and debate, but this isn't really for this thread.
Because he is ignorant of history and has demonstrated that in this thread. The Japanese fought to the last man to protect rocks in the middle of the Pacific. Millions would have died in an invasion of the homeland. We picked strategic industrial hubs in Japan to lessen civilian loss. We could have been ruthless and nuked Tokyo. It was brutal but necessary to end WWII.
Posted on 8/14/20 at 11:42 am to lsupride87
quote:
Like calling someone angry?
It was an in-kind response.
Posted on 8/14/20 at 11:44 am to FightingTigers138
quote:
Soldier deaths are not the same as civilian deaths.
You know absolutely nothing about WW2 era Japan. They were going to defend that island to the last person. Casualty estimates for Operation Downfall were conservatively estimated to be around 5 million. The fact that Japan didn't quit after the first bomb was dropped shows that it was the right decision. That was the most evil, barbaric society of the last 1000 years. They made ISIS look like choirboys.
Posted on 8/14/20 at 12:10 pm to FightingTigers138
I am amazed at the lack of knowledge of basic history. First of all, it was a fricking war and lots of innocent people die in wars. The Japanese at the time were one of the most evil civilizations in the history of the world. They were trained to fight to the death without ever surrendering and mothers volunteered their own sons to act as kamikaze pilots to die for their country. They committed genocide against the people of every pacific island they invaded, and all the reasons I just listed aren’t even half of the reasons why the bombs needed to be dropped. Was it a terrible thing? Yes, but in that situation it was absolutely necessary to ensure stability in the world for the future.
Posted on 8/14/20 at 12:39 pm to lsudave1
quote:
I am amazed at the lack of knowledge of basic history.
quote:
The Japanese at the time were one of the most evil civilizations in the history of the world.
Oh come on. Talk about a lack of knowledge of basic history.
Posted on 8/14/20 at 12:45 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
The Japanese at the time were one of the most evil civilizations in the history of the world.
Oh come on. Talk about a lack of knowledge of basic history.
Considering their body count, their atrocities against civilians, and some of the horrific shite they did to POWs, they absolutely were one of the most barbaric civilizations in history. The Nazis don't hold a candle to the WW2 era Japs. We just don't get taught about their atrocities in school nearly as much as we should.
I just did this a week ago, but some examples:
Cutting flesh from live POWs, cooking it and eating it, and then leaving said POWs to die in ditches.
Herding US POWs into air raid shelters, blocking the entrances, and setting the shelters on fire.
Tying Indian POWs to the surface of submarines and then diving the submarines with the POWs on the surface.
Tying POWs together in groups of 20, lining them up on the edge of a ship, and shooting one, causing the rest of them to fall overboard and drown.
Transporting POWs in overcrowded cargo holds while not marking the ships as carrying POWs. This led to numerous ships being torpedoed by American submarines who were unaware that Allied POWs were trapped in the holds while the ships sank. Google "hell ships".
Torpedoing hospital ships.
Rounding up nurses, raping and then executing them.
Human experiments (Unit 731).
The rape of Nanking.
The construction of the Burma Railway.
I could go on and on but I don't feel like it right now.
This post was edited on 8/14/20 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 8/14/20 at 12:58 pm to ItzMe1972
VJ Day is still considered a holiday in Rhode Island. Fun fact.
When I worked in RI for a while and they told me the office was closed for VJ Day I had no idea what they were talking about.
When I worked in RI for a while and they told me the office was closed for VJ Day I had no idea what they were talking about.
Posted on 8/14/20 at 1:32 pm to VADawg
quote:
We just don't get taught about their atrocities in school nearly as much as we should.
It really is odd when these discussions come up every August.
The Allied bombing campaigns in Europe killed civilians as well. But that seems to be justified in most people’s minds due to the well documented atrocities of the Nazi regime.
Popular
Back to top


0





