Started By
Message

re: Legality of Banning Cash Payments

Posted on 8/4/26 at 8:02 pm to
Posted by CapitalTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2019
764 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 8:02 pm to
The only entities that should be required to accept cash are government agencies.
Posted by Boudreauboudreaugoly
Land of the Rice n Son
Member since Oct 2017
3322 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 8:10 pm to
Too easy for employees to steal cash.
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27188 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 8:17 pm to
Only poors use cash.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
31473 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

LEGAL TENDER FOR ALL DEBTS PUBLIC AND PRIVATE.


FYI this does not mean what I think you think it means.

When you make a new purchase, it is not a "debt".

Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
31473 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 8:39 pm to
quote:


Legal tender is required to be accepted for a debt. Purchasing something is not a debt. Therefore, they can reject cash if they want.


You beat me to this (I should have read the whole thread); you are exactly correct. Precision of language is important.
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
47544 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

I bring this up because I just scheduled a doctors appointment, and even while scheduling, they bring up that cash payments are not accepted.

I know why they are doing it (a cashless society destroyed anonymity and lets them know pretty much everything about you and is just another way of tracking you)


You think your local doctor is doing it because he wants to destroy your anonymity and allow you to be tracked?

It could be that it's far easier for him to have financial tracking without any manual inputs for cash payments and reduces the administrative function or cost burden of cash deposits.
Posted by FCP
Delta State Univ. - Fightin' Okra
Member since Sep 2010
5241 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

Is it not legally required anymore that businesses have to accept cash as legal tender?
Can't imagine that the government would be able to dictate businesses must accept a particular currency. Now, if the government itself (e.g., DMV, IRS) were to mandate non-cash payments, that could present an issue.

If someone wants to open a bodega in Bogalusa and only accept yen or pesos, why should the government even care?
Posted by greenbean
USAF Retired - 31 years
Member since Feb 2019
6680 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 9:16 pm to
I buy ammo, drugs and sex toys with cash.
Posted by Bullfrog
Running Through the Wet Grass
Member since Jul 2010
62013 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 9:17 pm to
A debt is an obligation. Not the narrow view as a legal contract to borrow and repay in the future.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
31473 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

A debt is an obligation. Not the narrow view as a legal contract to borrow and repay in the future.


Every Federal court that has considered the issue has ruled that private businesses do not have to accept US tender for current sales.

States can and have ruled that businesses have to accept cash at point of sale.

Posted by nola tiger lsu
Member since Nov 2007
7676 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

Holy tinfoil hat, batman!


I am all for going cashless. Tap to pay has been so much easier. Also, as someone who can use a credit card responsibly for the points, its even better.



Upvote. Somehow there was only one other.

OP sounds insane. Cash at the Doctor? Jesus.
Posted by RustyDaDog
BAOK
Member since Mar 2023
1193 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 10:16 pm to
A lot of small businesses I know actually prefer cash, cause they aren’t reporting cash to the IRS…I think you should be able to use cash or card whatever is convenient. I hate going into a convenience store and using a card for 3$
Posted by Twenty 49
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2014
21609 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 5:57 am to
From the Federal Reserve:

Is it legal for a business in the United States to refuse cash as a form of payment?

There is no federal statute mandating that a private business, a person, or an organization must accept currency or coins as payment for goods or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether to accept cash unless there is a state law that says otherwise.

Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled "Legal tender," states: "United States coins and currency [including Federal Reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve Banks and national banks] are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues." This statute means that all U.S. money as identified above is a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor.

***

Highlights of ChatGTP's long answer:

There are relatively few reported appellate decisions squarely addressing the question because, under federal law, the issue is generally considered straightforward: there is no federal requirement that a private business accept cash for a contemporaneous sale of goods or services.

The "debt" question:

The harder issue is whether a business must accept cash after a debt already exists—for example:

restaurant where you pay after eating,
repair shop after work is completed,
medical bill,
loan payment.

Here, there is more legal debate, but even then there is no broad federal appellate rule holding that every creditor must always accept cash. The legal tender statute makes cash a valid tender of payment, but the consequences of refusing that tender depend on contract law and state law. Some jurisdictions treat a proper tender of legal tender as stopping interest or certain penalties without extinguishing the underlying obligation.

State laws can be different:

Several states and municipalities have enacted statutes requiring many retail businesses to accept cash. For example, Massachusetts has long had such a law, and New Jersey, Rhode Island, and some cities (such as New York City and Philadelphia) have enacted similar requirements. Those laws are based on state or local legislation—not on the federal legal tender statute.

Bottom line:

As a matter of federal law, there is no reported Supreme Court decision or leading federal appellate case holding that a business must accept paper currency for an ordinary retail sale. The prevailing legal rule comes from the interpretation of 31 U.S.C. § 5103: a private business generally may refuse cash for a sale unless state or local law requires otherwise.
Posted by Bullfrog
Running Through the Wet Grass
Member since Jul 2010
62013 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 6:27 am to
quote:

Every Federal court that has considered the issue has ruled that private businesses do not have to accept US tender for current sales.
I really can’t help it but they are all wrong.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
31473 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 6:48 am to
quote:

I really can’t help it but they are all wrong.


Delusion can be a comforting state to live in. Glad you found your happy place.
Posted by Bullfrog
Running Through the Wet Grass
Member since Jul 2010
62013 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 7:14 am to
The majority is always wrong in the financial markets and this issue is the same.
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
35285 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 7:15 am to
quote:

Yet more and more cash is essentially being banned. It's been the case at NFL stadiums and NHL arenas for awhile


This and like most places who went cashless is basically to prevent theft.
Ever see the people who work concessions at stadiums?

We should never go cashless, after Katrina, since card readers were down , businesses only took cash. People who demand a cashless society, have never lived through a natural disaster.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
31473 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 7:39 am to
quote:

The majority is always wrong in the financial markets and this issue is the same.


The distinction is being the minority in one of those situations can be profitable being the minority in the other simply means you are banging your head against the wall.

It boggles my mind that you can see that debt is considered a previously existing condition.

You as an individual don't get to decide what language means, I can emphatically claim a car is a boat and all anyone will do is shake their head, and rightfully so.

Most courts are open around 250 days a year. You are welcome to attempt to change their minds. That type of head banging isn't free and I guarantee you will end up with a headache. This is a wish in one hand and shite in the other situation.

Posted by Bullfrog
Running Through the Wet Grass
Member since Jul 2010
62013 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 8:36 am to
Forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors.

Obligations where a settlement is required unless forgiven. Not what you owe the state.
Posted by lsutigersFTW
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2008
8097 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 8:49 am to
A friend of mine asked me if I wanted to go with him and his son to see Spider-Man last night and I did and when we got there, I was totally taken aback that the box office where you typically pay with cash was completely boarded up and it was completely a purchase you take it online and scan your phone when you walk in the door type of cinema
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram