
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Legality of Banning Cash Payments
Posted on 8/4/26 at 8:02 pm to TheMagicMan
Posted on 8/4/26 at 8:02 pm to TheMagicMan
The only entities that should be required to accept cash are government agencies.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 8:10 pm to TheMagicMan
Too easy for employees to steal cash.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 8:37 pm to Bullfrog
quote:
LEGAL TENDER FOR ALL DEBTS PUBLIC AND PRIVATE.
FYI this does not mean what I think you think it means.
When you make a new purchase, it is not a "debt".
Posted on 8/4/26 at 8:39 pm to Randall Savauge
quote:
Legal tender is required to be accepted for a debt. Purchasing something is not a debt. Therefore, they can reject cash if they want.
You beat me to this (I should have read the whole thread); you are exactly correct. Precision of language is important.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 8:57 pm to TheMagicMan
quote:
I bring this up because I just scheduled a doctors appointment, and even while scheduling, they bring up that cash payments are not accepted.
I know why they are doing it (a cashless society destroyed anonymity and lets them know pretty much everything about you and is just another way of tracking you)
You think your local doctor is doing it because he wants to destroy your anonymity and allow you to be tracked?
It could be that it's far easier for him to have financial tracking without any manual inputs for cash payments and reduces the administrative function or cost burden of cash deposits.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 9:04 pm to TheMagicMan
quote:Can't imagine that the government would be able to dictate businesses must accept a particular currency. Now, if the government itself (e.g., DMV, IRS) were to mandate non-cash payments, that could present an issue.
Is it not legally required anymore that businesses have to accept cash as legal tender?
If someone wants to open a bodega in Bogalusa and only accept yen or pesos, why should the government even care?
Posted on 8/4/26 at 9:16 pm to TheMagicMan
I buy ammo, drugs and sex toys with cash.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 9:17 pm to Obtuse1
A debt is an obligation. Not the narrow view as a legal contract to borrow and repay in the future.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 9:36 pm to Bullfrog
quote:
A debt is an obligation. Not the narrow view as a legal contract to borrow and repay in the future.
Every Federal court that has considered the issue has ruled that private businesses do not have to accept US tender for current sales.
States can and have ruled that businesses have to accept cash at point of sale.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 10:02 pm to taylork37
quote:
Holy tinfoil hat, batman!
I am all for going cashless. Tap to pay has been so much easier. Also, as someone who can use a credit card responsibly for the points, its even better.
Upvote. Somehow there was only one other.
OP sounds insane. Cash at the Doctor? Jesus.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 10:16 pm to TheMagicMan
A lot of small businesses I know actually prefer cash, cause they aren’t reporting cash to the IRS…I think you should be able to use cash or card whatever is convenient. I hate going into a convenience store and using a card for 3$
Posted on 8/5/26 at 5:57 am to RustyDaDog
From the Federal Reserve:
Is it legal for a business in the United States to refuse cash as a form of payment?
There is no federal statute mandating that a private business, a person, or an organization must accept currency or coins as payment for goods or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether to accept cash unless there is a state law that says otherwise.
Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled "Legal tender," states: "United States coins and currency [including Federal Reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve Banks and national banks] are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues." This statute means that all U.S. money as identified above is a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor.
***
Highlights of ChatGTP's long answer:
There are relatively few reported appellate decisions squarely addressing the question because, under federal law, the issue is generally considered straightforward: there is no federal requirement that a private business accept cash for a contemporaneous sale of goods or services.
The "debt" question:
The harder issue is whether a business must accept cash after a debt already exists—for example:
restaurant where you pay after eating,
repair shop after work is completed,
medical bill,
loan payment.
Here, there is more legal debate, but even then there is no broad federal appellate rule holding that every creditor must always accept cash. The legal tender statute makes cash a valid tender of payment, but the consequences of refusing that tender depend on contract law and state law. Some jurisdictions treat a proper tender of legal tender as stopping interest or certain penalties without extinguishing the underlying obligation.
State laws can be different:
Several states and municipalities have enacted statutes requiring many retail businesses to accept cash. For example, Massachusetts has long had such a law, and New Jersey, Rhode Island, and some cities (such as New York City and Philadelphia) have enacted similar requirements. Those laws are based on state or local legislation—not on the federal legal tender statute.
Bottom line:
As a matter of federal law, there is no reported Supreme Court decision or leading federal appellate case holding that a business must accept paper currency for an ordinary retail sale. The prevailing legal rule comes from the interpretation of 31 U.S.C. § 5103: a private business generally may refuse cash for a sale unless state or local law requires otherwise.
Is it legal for a business in the United States to refuse cash as a form of payment?
There is no federal statute mandating that a private business, a person, or an organization must accept currency or coins as payment for goods or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether to accept cash unless there is a state law that says otherwise.
Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled "Legal tender," states: "United States coins and currency [including Federal Reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve Banks and national banks] are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues." This statute means that all U.S. money as identified above is a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor.
***
Highlights of ChatGTP's long answer:
There are relatively few reported appellate decisions squarely addressing the question because, under federal law, the issue is generally considered straightforward: there is no federal requirement that a private business accept cash for a contemporaneous sale of goods or services.
The "debt" question:
The harder issue is whether a business must accept cash after a debt already exists—for example:
restaurant where you pay after eating,
repair shop after work is completed,
medical bill,
loan payment.
Here, there is more legal debate, but even then there is no broad federal appellate rule holding that every creditor must always accept cash. The legal tender statute makes cash a valid tender of payment, but the consequences of refusing that tender depend on contract law and state law. Some jurisdictions treat a proper tender of legal tender as stopping interest or certain penalties without extinguishing the underlying obligation.
State laws can be different:
Several states and municipalities have enacted statutes requiring many retail businesses to accept cash. For example, Massachusetts has long had such a law, and New Jersey, Rhode Island, and some cities (such as New York City and Philadelphia) have enacted similar requirements. Those laws are based on state or local legislation—not on the federal legal tender statute.
Bottom line:
As a matter of federal law, there is no reported Supreme Court decision or leading federal appellate case holding that a business must accept paper currency for an ordinary retail sale. The prevailing legal rule comes from the interpretation of 31 U.S.C. § 5103: a private business generally may refuse cash for a sale unless state or local law requires otherwise.
Posted on 8/5/26 at 6:27 am to Obtuse1
quote:I really can’t help it but they are all wrong.
Every Federal court that has considered the issue has ruled that private businesses do not have to accept US tender for current sales.
Posted on 8/5/26 at 6:48 am to Bullfrog
quote:
I really can’t help it but they are all wrong.
Delusion can be a comforting state to live in. Glad you found your happy place.
Posted on 8/5/26 at 7:14 am to Obtuse1
The majority is always wrong in the financial markets and this issue is the same.
Posted on 8/5/26 at 7:15 am to TheMagicMan
quote:
Yet more and more cash is essentially being banned. It's been the case at NFL stadiums and NHL arenas for awhile
This and like most places who went cashless is basically to prevent theft.
Ever see the people who work concessions at stadiums?
We should never go cashless, after Katrina, since card readers were down , businesses only took cash. People who demand a cashless society, have never lived through a natural disaster.
Posted on 8/5/26 at 7:39 am to Bullfrog
quote:
The majority is always wrong in the financial markets and this issue is the same.
The distinction is being the minority in one of those situations can be profitable being the minority in the other simply means you are banging your head against the wall.
It boggles my mind that you can see that debt is considered a previously existing condition.
You as an individual don't get to decide what language means, I can emphatically claim a car is a boat and all anyone will do is shake their head, and rightfully so.
Most courts are open around 250 days a year. You are welcome to attempt to change their minds. That type of head banging isn't free and I guarantee you will end up with a headache. This is a wish in one hand and shite in the other situation.
Posted on 8/5/26 at 8:36 am to Obtuse1
Forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors.
Obligations where a settlement is required unless forgiven. Not what you owe the state.
Obligations where a settlement is required unless forgiven. Not what you owe the state.
Posted on 8/5/26 at 8:49 am to TheMagicMan
A friend of mine asked me if I wanted to go with him and his son to see Spider-Man last night and I did and when we got there, I was totally taken aback that the box office where you typically pay with cash was completely boarded up and it was completely a purchase you take it online and scan your phone when you walk in the door type of cinema

Popular
Back to top


0









